Texas Drifter: Some Americans Still Support Crucifixion?

Library Entry # 805

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Observation, judgment day is personal. Not being a religious scholar, just asking: Will Americans who still support Crucifixion of Heaven’s Son, be able to use “excuse” on their personal judgment days, “I did not know any better”?

Brief background of Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
1. First signed into law by President Clinton 1993
2. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that RFRA could not be applied to States
3. Since Supreme Court ruling over twenty States have adopted similar legislation to RFRA

Controversy seems to be:
1. That businesses (are not corporations businesses) have “free exercise” rights equaling rights matching those of individuals and churches
2. Businesses / corporations have free exercise rights “defense” against a private law suit by another person rather than actions simply brought by government

Bottom line is that opponents to RFRA seemingly wish to provide individual haters same “rights” as government to engage in activities that violate:
1. First Commandment of Ten – Thou shall have no other gods before me (tyranny like government)
2. First Bill of Right of Ten - prohibit citizens who own or run businesses from exercising their religious beliefs while engaged in commerce (tyranny like government)
3. Tenth Bill of Right – prohibit States from exercising States Rights

Seems opponents to above laws might have felt that a citizen mob should have been allowed to crucify Heaven’s Son, because haters are entitled to act like private sector tyrants, just as most governments act like tyrants. These “whole world owes us, because we haters believe that we are entitled to sovereignty immunity, because only our rights matter."

Translation concepts like inalienable rights; U.S. Constitutional guaranteed rights plus those in Bill of Rights do not apply to Judeo-Christians, or anyone else not willing to worship the self-appointed we are better than you false prophets.

It is not a very long journey from ruining or destroying: reputations, financial lives, physical health and well-being of Judeo-Christian citizens for not sacrificing their sacred honors; to demanding that a thief be released so a private mob could crucify Heaven’s Son. Why, simply for not worshiping or publicly honoring selfish spoiled false prophets among us.

Question does not condemning Religious Freedom Restoration Acts like the one in Indiana, Texas, and other States promote mob rule injustices against business owners who do not wish to leave their religious values out of all their business decisions? Texas Drifter not a legal scholar, could be wrong, did not The United States Supreme Court, in 1819, provide (partial excerpt) legal description of a corporation: A corporation is an artificial being, (end excerpt).

Does not this “artificial being” reflect the moral ethical standards of its owners and managers who are living individuals? Explain why these living individuals can only extend their religious principles to their personal and social lives; and not their lives while engaged in commerce. Better still, show Texas Drifter where such a prohibition is protected in either Ten Commandments or Bill of Rights.

Observation restated different way: Does not condemning Religious Freedom Restoration Acts like the one in Indiana, Texas, and other States promote mob rule injustices against business owners who do not wish to leave their religious values out of all their business decisions? If it is not a very long journey from ruining or destroying: reputations, financial lives, physical health and well-being of Judeo-Christian citizens for not sacrificing their sacred honors in commerce. Why, for not worshiping or publicly honoring selfish spoiled false prophets among us; to demanding that a thief be released so a private mob could crucify Heaven’s Son.

How can Reader be sure that those wailing against Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act, would not also still support crucifixion of Heaven Son? Some of most outspoken have included: NASCAR; Walmart; NCAA; some Fox Radio Sports celebrities; others Reader might list. TRUE or FALSE

Not accusing, just asking.

Question, opponents of Religious Freedom Restoration Acts probably also oppose ethical capitalism. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question - Opening “Dateline” for this writing exercise: – Observation, judgment day is personal. Not being a religious scholar, just asking: Will Americans who still support Crucifixion of Heaven’s Son, be able to use "excuse" on their personal judgment days, “I did not know any better”?; is probably more right than wrong. TRUE or FALSE