Texas Drifter: Obama Providing Cover for 911 Terrorists?

Library Entry # 782

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Truth is one of most important foundations for survival of constitutional due process republics. Free Americans have an inalienable right for truthful answers to following questions!

Foundation for truth to determine if Obama is providing cover for 911 terrorists starts with following observations.

1) World News Daily – Information Clearing House (Excerpt) "Saudi Arabia May Be Tied to 9/11, 2 Ex-Senators Say" By ERIC LICHTBLAU March 01, 2012 "NY Times" --WASHINGTON — For more than a decade, questions have lingered about the possible role of the Saudi government in the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, even as the royal kingdom has made itself a crucial counterterrorism partner in the eyes of American diplomats.

Now, in sworn statements that seem likely to reignite the debate, two former senators who were privy to top secret information on the Saudis’ activities say they believe that the Saudi government might have played a direct role in the terrorist attacks.

“I am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia,” former Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida, said in an affidavit filed as part of a lawsuit brought against the Saudi government and dozens of institutions in the country by families of Sept. 11 victims and others. Mr. Graham led a joint 2002 Congressional inquiry into the attacks.

His former Senate colleague, Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, a Democrat who served on the separate 9/11 Commission, said in a sworn affidavit of his own in the case that “significant questions remain unanswered” about the role of Saudi institutions. “Evidence relating to the plausible involvement of possible Saudi government agents in the September 11th attacks has never been fully pursued,” Mr. Kerrey said. (End excerpt)

2) Other Public Information
Former Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) co-led the official Congressional inquiry into the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks, known as the “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001. “

The Congressional investigation supplemented the “National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States,” also known simply as the 9/11 Commission.

For years Graham has been pushing to declassify a 28-page section of the 9/11 Commission Report which was omitted from the public eye. The 28 pages may only be read by members of Congress in a secure location, one person at a time, and the specific contents cannot be revealed to anyone. It is not clear how many members have read them.

Those who have read the 28 pages have made assurances that national security would not be harmed if they were released to the public. It would, however, impact our national security and foreign policy strategies.

3) Recent Mossaou comments in Business Insider February 4, 2014. (Excerpt) “Jailed al Qaeda operative makes explosive claims about Saudi royals funding pre-9/11 terror”

A convicted al-Qaeda operative has claimed that members of the terrorist network received extensive financial support from members of the Saudi royal family throughout the late 1990's and into 2000, the New York Times reported Wednesday.

Zacarias Moussaou, a 46-year-old French native serving life in prison for his role in the 9/11 attacks, said he was instructed by Qaeda leaders in Afghanistan to create a database of all of the donors to the group.

Among those who donated, Moussaou alleges, were the Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal and the longtime Saudi ambassador to the US Prince Bandar Bin Sultan.

Moussaou also claims that he discussed plans to shoot down Air Force One with a staff member at the Saudi Embassy in Washington.

In the wake of Moussaou's testimony, the Saudi Embassy released a statement calling Moussaou a "deranged criminal" and denying that the Saudi government had ever funded Al Qaeda.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/jailed-al-qaeda-operative-makes-explosive-claims-about-saudi-royals-funding-pre-911-terror-2015-2#ixzz3QtiQeUOS (End excerpt)

4) New York Times February 02, 2015 (Excerpt) “Moussaoui Calls Saudi Princes Patrons of Al Qaeda”

WASHINGTON — In highly unusual testimony inside the federal supermax prison, a former operative for Al Qaeda has described prominent members of Saudi Arabia’s royal family as major donors to the terrorist network in the late 1990s and claimed that he discussed a plan to shoot down Air Force One with a Stinger missile with a staff member at the Saudi Embassy in Washington.

The Qaeda member, Zacarias Moussaoui, wrote last year to Judge George B. Daniels of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, who is presiding over a lawsuit filed against Saudi Arabia by relatives of those killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He said he wanted to testify in the case, and after lengthy negotiations with Justice Department officials and the federal Bureau of Prisons, a team of lawyers was permitted to enter the prison and question him for two days last October.

In a statement Monday night, the Saudi Embassy said that the national Sept. 11 commission had rejected allegations that the Saudi government or Saudi officials had funded Al Qaeda. “Moussaoui is a deranged criminal whose own lawyers presented evidence that he was mentally incompetent,” the statement said. “His words have no credibility.”

Mr. Moussaoui received a diagnosis of mental illness by a psychologist who testified on his behalf, but he was found competent to stand trial on terrorism charges. He was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 and is held in the most secure prison in the federal system, in Florence, Colo. Mr. Moussaoui’s accusations could not be verified.

The allegations from Mr. Moussaoui come at a sensitive time in Saudi-American relations, less than two weeks after the death of the country’s longtime monarch, King Abdullah, and the succession of a half-brother, King Salman.

There has often been tension between Saudi leaders and the Obama administration since the Arab uprisings of 2011 and the efforts to manage the region’s resulting turmoil. Mr. Moussaoui describes meeting in Saudi Arabia with Salman, then a prince, and other Saudi royals while delivering them letters from Osama bin Laden.

There has long been evidence that wealthy Saudis provided support for bin Laden, the son of a Saudi construction magnate, and Al Qaeda before the 2001 attacks. Saudi Arabia had worked closely with the United States to finance Islamic militants fighting the Soviet Army in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and Al Qaeda drew its members from those militant fighters.

But the extent and nature of Saudi involvement in Al Qaeda, and whether it extended to the planning and financing of the Sept. 11 attacks, has long been a subject of dispute.

Mr. Moussaoui’s testimony, if judged credible, provides new details of the extent and nature of that support in the pre-9/11 period. In more than 100 pages of testimony, filed in federal court in New York on Monday, he comes across as calm and largely coherent, though the plaintiffs’ lawyers questioning him do not challenge his statements. (End excerpt)


Question one, Would President Bush II’s redacted 28 pages of “28-page section of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001”; inform the American people that Saudis not only provided financial support, but that Saudis also, provided logistical and technical support for 911 terrorists?

“Proof or lack of proof” of Saudis involvement in 911 terrorist attack is easy enough to verify; Obama simply releases 28 redacted pages so American people can reach their own conclusions. Then again, if Obama refuses to release the report classified by Bush II; one can consider whether Obama is providing cover for 911 terrorists, and their collaborators at minimum or accessories and participants for worst case scenario. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question – There would be little difference between Republican establishment politicians and or Obama “covering” Saudi’s anti-American policies and actions for oil profits from international trade; and the same American internationalists engaging in economic trade with China. Why, so China could use their manufacturing and financial profits from doing business with America to build China’s military. Why, so China could threaten both America’s national security and domestic tranquility. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Exception to title “Obama Providing Cover for 911 Terrorists?” - and releasing redacted pages, it could be the very first and perhaps very last time Obama ever did anything that was in the best interest of America’s national security and domestic tranquility. Good question for Republicans next 2016 Presidential candidate: Will your very first act as President be to release twenty-eight pages of 911 truths to the American people?