Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Texas Drifter: Obama Entertainment Hypocrite?
Library Entry # 769
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Obama supported satire entertainment about assassinating one vicious, sadistic, rabid souled North Korean tyrant. Title asks, would Obama be a hypocrite about entertainment based on due process justice?
Following is very, very short story screenplay concept entitled: “Obama Heaven’s Gift to America?”
Premise suggests that sometimes Reader has to personally experience evil to ____; Reader can fill in blank to finish sentence.
Introduction to very, very short story screenplay concept: “Obama Heaven’s Gift to America?”
(Scene: Patriot Commander’s Headquarters)
Patriot Commander: Alright Gentlemen, I expect you to repeat every word of my following orders to my junior officers and citizen-patriot volunteers.
Patriot Commander Continues: Today is America’s earthly judgment day. I have a one battle army. I will personally severely punish any of you; any of my junior officers, any of my citizen-patriot volunteers that violate my orders.
P.C. Continues: The soon to be over battle is win, die; or lose and condemn your women, children and America’s future generations to lives too horrible for you to imagine. Those who want to go play with their wives and children; need only (points to floor) cross this imaginary line. You are not wanted here, so leave the battlefield to citizen-patriots who still believe one purpose of courage is to defend honor at any cost.
Continuing: I need; no must have that treasonous President’s inner circle alive to publicly testify about their tyrant’s crimes. I cannot; no, will not allow America’s treasonous President to become a martyr. His allies and supporters must publicly witness how their evil, vindictive, coward tyrant acts before he is publicly sent back to his unholy father in Hades.
Patriot Commander Closing: Now, let us all go finish what our “faith” brought us here to do; may Heaven bless your efforts to save America!
Epilogue: Effectiveness of Patriot Commanders words will be recorded by future American citizen–patriot historians.
End of very, very short story screenplay concept: “Obama Heaven’s Gift to America?”
Question, writing exercise title and very, very short story screenplay concept are not related. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question, truth will eventually prevail in Sony / North Korea incident. TRUE not FALSE
Bonus thought, is F.B.I. unlike I.R.S. and E.P.A. both members of Obama’s Brown Shirts; or is F.B.I. still America’s F.B.I.?
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Texas Drifter: Profile 2015 Lethal Threats to America
Library Entry # 768
Marshall’s Law Dateline – This writing exercise begins with one still unanswered question; one clue; then follows with some undeniable brutal observations. Question, a citizen-patriot’s greatest fear is choosing between loyalty to their country and loyalty to their republic. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Where will America’s republic exist, if there is no country to provide a homeland for America’s constitutional republic? Brutal observation, it is not “if” PSC (patriotic security conservative) strategies and tactics are necessary to stop decline of America’s ethical capitalist constitutional republic. Rather “if” American citizen-patriots will act in time to stop decline and save America’s Founding Fathers’ envisioned constitutional republic.
Foreign geo-regional lethal threats confronting 2015 America:
1. Russia in Europe;
2. China in Pacific;
3. Iran / Islamic Nazi Terrorists in Middle East and their “training camps” throughout third world countries like Mexico and across America;
4. Third world dictators and their alliances with black market gangs.
Domestic lethal threats confronting 2015 America:
1. LBGA (liberal big government advocates) like Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats with their insatiable lust for communist style political-economic systems;
2. CBGA (conservative big government advocates) like internationalist corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats with their insatiable lust for greed;
3. Conservative pretenders and cult leaders with their insatiable Robespierre lust to force their moral beliefs on others, much like Islamic Jihadists;
4. World owes us perpetual victims haters like Obama’s race based “kill all cops” allies;
5. Public subsidy welfare addicts and the public bureaucracies distributing resources stolen through excessive taxes and fascist regulations of and from private property owners;
6. Politically apathetic with their “just feel good” only recreation activities matter.
Follow up points to above item five. First, what contributions do public subsidy welfare addicts, and the public bureaucracies distributing resources stolen through excessive taxes and fascist regulations of private property owners, contribute to preserving or making America a better country? Answer, not a single thing with their addictions to violating Commandments: thou shall not steal, thou shall not covet; thou shall have no other Gods before me; and several others Reader can list.
Perhaps America’s citizen- patriots shall demand that a constitutional amendment be enacted and implemented to correct following injustice? Total welfare benefits to most anti-family professional welfare beneficiaries shall not when combined in total exceed salary and benefits of one single lowest ranking military individual.
Republicans who tolerate cutting individual military personnel and their family benefits; so as to allow public subsidy addicts including illegal immigrants to receive forty thousand to sixty thousand dollars a year in public cash payments, public services, and other public benefits fall below Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats on history’s most despicable traitors’ to Heaven, America, and humanity’s list. TRUE or FALSE
Profiling 2015 lethal threats to America the country, and America’s republic which are two distinctly different political entities; starts with identifying threats because Reader needs to know who viable lethal threats are. Why to avoid excessive collateral damages to innocents.
Frist step in strategy has to be stopping decline of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic. It used to be common sense in days passed by; one cannot begin a counter attack until enemy advances have been stopped. Translation: “re-building” process cannot begin until “declining” process has been stopped.
Reader has to understand that simply talking to bad guys, or waiting for sworn enemies to get bored and return home are not winning final options. Something Reader might try to explain to some still reasonable libertarians. Libertarians defense strategies of hiding behind walls of a fort until barbarian savages get bored, and leave to cannibalize some other group is not a winning defensive strategy.
It is also important for PSC citizen-patriots to not imitate America’s sworn lethal 2015 enemies by letting PSC’s vanity blind them too their personal inadequacies. Samples include:
1. LBGA Marxist-fascist are blinded by communist / fascist ideologies;
2. CBGA corporate fascist internationalist Republicans are blinded by greed;
3. Special interest haters known as world owes us perpetual victims are blinded by “blaming others rationalizations” for their being unsympathetic losers;
4. Conservative cult leaders many masquerading as media ratings celebrities, are blinded while lusting for exaggerated self-importance self-images; which are often caused by believing too many of their own press releases.
5. Using amnesty to provide de-facto citizenship to illegal immigrants who migrated to America not to assimilate into productive Americans; rather to re-colonize America for their third world homelands as is constantly demonstrated by Mexico.
Since strategy in many cases is limited to winning; some PSC tactics which Reader might consider include following - TRUE or FALSE;
1. Editor Marshall’s “social power formula”: SP + Q1 + Q2 Over T
2. Editor Marshall’s “up close and personal” tactic;
3. Traditional tactic like repelling / stopping attack (decline)
4. Traditional tactic like: securing perimeter;
5. Traditional tactic like policing premises;
6. Traditional tactic like beginning offense maneuvers or “rebuilding”;
7. Recall adage “eternal vigilance” to resolve future “small” problems before they become big problems.
Bonus question, it is always more difficult to defeat a lethal enemy when Reader has not identified the lethal enemy. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Reader now has no excuse for not being able to profile 2015 lethal threats to America.
Refresher Courtesy Dateline – Reader should feel free to download Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library to their personal files; so long as downloads are not edited and or used for commercial purposes. One example, free gifts for Reader to enjoy and distribute; from Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall - reference Library Entry # 732 – “Marketing Memo for Editor Marshall” and M.LT.D. Library Index #759A.
Monday, December 29, 2014
Texas Drifter: PSC Patriot's Greatest Fear
Library Entry # 767
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Following is re-edited Texas Drifter writing exercise first published in 1987; seems theme could still be appropriate in the year 2015.
Simply expressed, a patriot’s greatest fear is discovering the republic he or she cherishes is not protecting the country he or she loves. Why is this important; without a country, there is no place for the republic to exist or call homeland.
It appears that nature slowly unfolds and directs life through four phases: birth; maturing; achieving potential; and a final stage of renaissance/enjoyment and stability “until death do us part”.
If America’s republic is not properly maturing, who are the players causing the premature decline of America’s political-economic “system”?
Names of guilty will not be changed to protect the guilty. First come the “liberal big government advocates” (LBGA); these are ideologically motivated Marxist-fascists who are changing America’s system with other’s people’s money collected through a tax of one kind or the other.
Next come the “conservative big government advocates” (CBGA) who are changing America social fabric by causing government to implement and enforce legislation based on corporate fascist and moral fascist concepts of morality.
Finishing out America’s political arena are “ethical capitalists” known as “patriotic security conservatives” (PSC). These citizen-patriots tend to be pragmatic “small government advocates” (PSC-SGA); who accept the premise that ethical free enterprise is the process provided by Heaven to glorify His name with good works.
Ethical capitalists (PSC) include the worker who trades their skills for bargained economic compensation usually known as a salary. Ethical capitalists also includes those individuals who own and operate small businesses, or who are part of major corporations.
The PSC ethical capitalist is generally a citizen-patriot who depends on their own energies for economic self-sufficiency. Also, these citizen-patriots know that offering a starving man ten dollars for a hundred dollar horse is stealing or unethical capitalism.
LBGA’s build their political bases on the concept of trading government services for public subsidy addict votes funded by extorted tax dollar revenues. One consequence of this activity is the institutionalization of social misery and poverty.
This institutionalization of poverty increases the rate of public crimes and domestic violence. The inspired economic philosopher, Adam Smith, taught that the domestic crime rate among the general population is directly related to number of citizens depending on public dollars for their livelihoods (includes both welfare recipients and public bureaucrats).
LBGA political-economic policies perpetuate misery, increase domestic violence, hatreds among different social groups, decreased public finding for national security and domestic tranquility, plus facilitates national bankruptcy with deficit budgets contributing to eventual self-destructive national debt.
The threat from CBGA’s is loss of personal freedoms, and due process under both spirit of laws and letter of laws due mostly to CBGA’s lusts for self-destructive domestic and international greed. The freedom of religion principles in First Bill of Right in America’s constitution guarantees two inalienable rights: 1) separation of State from Church; 2) not separation of Church from State.
CBGA’s are constantly getting government to implement legislation that rewards their internationalist lust for greed, or force their collective personal beliefs on other citizens. CBGA’s who violate America’s spirit of law like Declaration of Independence or letter of laws like U.S. Constitution are no different than LBGA’s. Perhaps an explanation of why Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate-fascists Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats share closet alliances, and both hate grass roots conservatives like Tea Party groups?
PSC’s know that governments are not immune from the lessons of history. There is no substitute for financial integrity, whether the entity be an individual or a government. The PSC also knows that personal freed for middle class citizens is essential for economic progress. A concept as old as Aristotle, consider following excerpt.
Aristotle correctly observed two thousand years in advance of America’s internationalist aristocrats: noble character is seldom found among those of noble birth, most who are good for nothing … highly gifted families often degenerate into maniacs.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes (like Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats) the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich (Republican establishment aristocrats) get the better of the poor, or the poor (Progressive Democrats) of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert) - Editor Marshall’s note: ( ) inserts by Editor’ Marshall would have probably been included by Aristotle if Aristotle were still writing?
Translation of above Aristotle lesson by George H. Sabine; A History of Political Theory; Third Edition; Holt, Rinehart, Winston; Copyrights 1930 – 1950 – 1961; (#) is page number.
(101) …oligarchy is government by very rich, as democracy is government by the poor …
(102) …a plundering democracy is no more honest than an expanding oligarchy …
(103) …A good state must be ruled accordingly to the law, but this is not the same as saying that a state ruled according the law is a good …
(105) … Moral ideals – the sovereignty of law, the freedom of equality of citizens, constitutional government, the perfecting of men in a civilized life are the ends for which the state should exist …
(111) …What upon distribution of property. If there is a fairly large class of property owners with no extremes of wealth … but if there is a very small class of the very wealthy, government will likely fall into hands of a clique …
(113) …It social foundation is the existence of a large middle class composed of those who are neither very rich nor very poor …
(115) …It is the extreme in any direction that ruins states. In short, if not actually a middle class government, the state must act like a middle class government as it can … (End excerpts Aristotle lessons)
It should be noted that despite what some conservative celebrities preach; Karl Marx did not invent term “middle class” or concept of “middle class attitude”. Perhaps some conservative celebrities should re-evaluate their obviously incorrect rants.
Three of the world’s greatest “democratic” societies include Greece, Rome, and the United States. The Greeks were the first, and the passive Socrates brought the Democratic age of Greece to its end. He allowed himself to be forced into suicide. Was it a democratic murder ... a vote by the people? The self- execution of Socrates was caused by some sixty elected representatives. A strong voice representing some five hundred members.
Plutarch describes the treatment of Socrates persecutors: The accessories became so unpopular that no citizen would light their fires; answer their questions; bathe in the same water with them; so they were at last driven to hang themselves.”
Perhaps Socrates self-execution had wisdom after all? Topic for another time.
The Greek democracy never regained its moral integrity after the death of Socrates and collapsed into anarchy. Noted historian, Will Durant, also noted the abuse to the Greek democracy: “Athens had suffered a wound to her spirit which seemed too deep to heal.”
Next came the Roman democracy. One of the most difficult decisions Julius Caesar faced during his career was whether or not to support his beloved democracy at the expense of his country. Caesar reluctantly chose to save his homeland at the expense of a principle dear to him: free speech.
Ask yourself reader, would you act to: save the country at the expense of the republic; or save the republic at the expense of the country? It is up to citizen-patriot Americans on an individual basis to decide if and when the actions of LBGA’s and or CBGA’s are part of a maturing process; or are cause for fear among American patriots.
People who push America’s republic to the point of debasing the American citizen-patriots, need to replay American history. The American Revolution created more than just results and benefits. It also created an attitude towards despotic government be they administered by LBGA’s; CBGA’s; or some type of Robespierre type conservative cult.
Translation. America’s Declaration of Independence and Revolution along with later Texas Revolution; both created attitudes towards accepting any despotic government whether they be monarchy, oligarchy, mob rule democracy, or anarchy. Adage “Don’t Tread On Me” spawned the Declaration of Independence based partially on 1581 Abjuration Act which guarantees every American citizen-patriot inalienable right from tyranny.
The United States Constitution, despite its greatness, is a viable document so long as it is not abused to the point of violating citizen’s spirit of law Rights guaranteed by Declaration of Independence. For right or wrong, is it likely that American citizen-patriots who believe that freedom is worth fighting for, will pursue the passive position of a Socrates?
Today’s and tomorrow’s generations deserve more than having to confront a patriot’s worse fear of having to choose between country and republic. TRUE or FALSE
Question, seems America’s Judeo-Christian citizen-patriots only have three choices to stop the 1) decline and 2) re-establishment of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic:
1. Abandon any loyalty and any support for LBGA political interests (Reader can list)
2. Abandon any loyalty and any support for CBGA political interests (Reader can list)
3. Stand “heel and toe” with loyalty and support for PSC ethical capitalist citizen-patriots; while ignoring conservative pretenders and Robespierre type cult leaders.
Reader can choose TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question, a citizen-patriot’s greatest fear is choosing between loyalty to country and loyalty to republic. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Where does republic exist, if there is no country to provide a home for an orphan republic?
Bonus thought – Consider case for letting children have childhoods; Reader disagrees, then do children without childhoods often end up like Satan’s children who can become so evil; that not even Heaven can forgive them?
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Texas Drifter: Are Rioters Obama's Brown Shirts?
Library Entry # 766
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Some questions for citizen-patriots require courage to answer.
Definition of question: interrogative expression to test knowledge.
Definition of courage: mental or moral strength to venture, preserve, and or withstand danger, fear, or difficulty.
Definition of Brown Shirts is Nazi like storm troopers.
Definition of storm troopers is member of private/personal NAZI like army notorious for aggressive often rabid violence, brutality, and or sadism.
Few sample questions which require courage to truthfully answer.
1. Progressive Democrat politicians are Obama’s Gestapo leaders? TRUE or FALSE
2. Some bureaucrats at agencies like EPA and IRS are Obama’s personal Progressive Democrat storm troopers. TRUE or FALSE
3. Race and ethnic hate motivated rioters are Obama’s Administration “personal” Brown Shirts. TRUE or FALSE
4. Obama’s hate all police Brown Shirts will likely become America’s future domestic terrorists. TRUE or FALSE
5. Street gangs will become Obama allies like Muslim Brotherhood, and other Islamic NAZI terrorists. TRUE or FALSE
6. Citizens apathetic to Obama’s unconstitutional policies and actions are accessories to Obama’s crimes against Heaven, America, Americans, and humanity. TRUE or FALSE
7. Those tolerating Obama’s unconstitutional policies and actions like corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats, no matter how courteous they seem; will be judged by future historians to have been Obama sympathizers and collaborators. TRUE or FALSE
8. “Spirit of laws” like locally controlled grand juries which determine need for citizens to be tried before government are not now or ever negotiable with mobs or tyrants. (Reader might reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 759 “Some Conservatives Join P.C. Lynch Mobs?”) TRUE or FALSE
9. Constitutional and Bill of Rights plus other due process “letter of laws” are not now or ever negotiable with mobs or tyrants. TRUE or FALSE
10. Citizen-patriots have to determine their own answers to preceding questions. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question – All P.S.C. (Patriotic Security Conservatives) like Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall are doing is asking questions which Reader might, for a real challenge; ask themselves while looking into a mirror. TRUE not FALSE
Bonus clue – Perhaps Reader who has never heard a ghostly bugle playing taps, calling on all American citizen-patriots to stand heel to toe; perhaps that reader, will never understand? Now maybe Reader understands why Texas Drifter believes judgment day is personal.
Bonus thought – Those for whom that ghostly bugle is playing taps for; fully understand that judgment day is personal.
Monday, December 22, 2014
Texas Drifter: Down Sides Texas Open Carry
Library Entry # 765
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Pragmatic decisions generally involve impartially comparing down sides to up sides. Example, concealed carry and open carry require different skills; hence different training.
Definition of pragmatic is relating to matters of fact often to exclusion of idealism or artistic matters.
Before Texas Drifter forgets, perhaps Reader can help this older citizen-patriot recall who said: We use capitalism to finance socialism.
Few FBI statistical facts about armed confrontations:
1. Eighty-five percent of all confrontations are less than twenty feet
2. Ninety percent of all killings are between zero and ten feet
3. Fifty percent of all killings are five feet or less
4. More than seventy-four percent of all shootings are during darkness or in dim light
5. More than sixty percent of confrontations are over in two to three seconds
6. At least forty-eight percent of confrontations involve more than one assailant
7. Once armed assailant is confronted, chances are forty to sixty percent assailant will shoot
8. Estimated more than ninety percent of all fatal shootings are caused by fatal non-alertness
9. Reader might reference: STREET SURVIVAL: TACTICS FOR ARMED ENCOUNTERS by Ronald J. Adams and Thomas a. McTernan – Caliber Press
Observations comparing concealed carry and open carry:
1. Concealed carry does not readily identify targets for bad guys; open carry readily identifies targets for bad guys; Two samples, undercover agents do not usually wear name tags identifying them as undercover agents; plus many executive protection personnel (body guards) “dress down” so as not to give bad guys chance to shoot them before taking out their client – more explanations can be provided at another time
2. Armed scenario options
a) Avoid crisis scenario
b) Mental state similar to “buck fever” which can be between “freezing” to exaggerated tunnel vision
c) Panic and soot everything that moves or is in vicinity
d) Break even (get shot stopping threat and survive)
e) Walkaway after shooting
3. Reflexes take over and one performs like they trained with continuous practice – Consider following insert from Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry# 785 - Editor Marshall’s Note for some of Texas Drifter’s students tag: other reference materials updates, can be found at texasdrifterreadbeforeyoubuy.blogspot.com (to) View My complete Profile (to) ML Dateline Volume III (to) Tx D Volume 2 (Spy As a Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance) (to) <23> Page 44 and insert into notes where appropriate:
a) Feral human conduct scenarios are likely to involve multiple attackers from small packs to herds
b) Techniques: pre-count to know confrontation “steps” yours and bad guys
c) Decision making stops when reflexes begin
d) Disciplined reflexes are not affected by emotions; and improve with constant training also called practice
4. There are no “do overs” after accidental shootings
5. Texas would probably not need open carry provisions if “temporary concealed carry permits” were available for “emergency threatening” situations in less than twenty-four hours. Exceptions could be considered for those depending on “good for only toilet paper” restraining orders; as everyone knows or should know that public law enforcement response times generally leave them to only find deceased with bad guy gone. Open carry provides threatened opportunity to protect themselves when public law enforcement cannot.
6. One down side of open carry is that it can provide bad guys with access to readily available weapons in social and commercial settings. Bad guy demands while holding knife to child; give me your weapon or I will cut her throat – What would you do Reader; give bad guy your open carry weapon or let bad guy cut your child’s throat? – Could open carry result in more collateral damage in preceding scenario?
7. Some are thinking that Texas Drifter is “worrying too much” – Security consulting is a one mistake business – clients are not likely to hire those who got their last clients killed; regardless of excuse or reason – Reader can choose word. Question, which self-defense activity requires more training, concealed carry or open carry?
8. Registration for concealed carry permit in Texas requires solid back ground check. Law enforcement officer sees permit, and knows that permit holder has undergone thorough background check. Officer sees individual walking down street with open carry weapon; officer does not know if that individual is illegal immigrant drug cartel gangster or member of some Islamic Nazi terrorist group. Seems that open carry participants should be required to undergo similar background check required when purchasing new store bought gun.
9. One down side to both concealed carry and open carry is that “bullets” are impartial or neutral to what they hit or damage they do, once bullet/s leave chamber.
10. One upside to bother concealed carry and open carry, it sure is nice to have bullets leaving the chamber to protect life, health, liberty, and property from: tyrants, foreign enemies, domestic bad guys, and crazies that want to do innocents harm.
11. Reader might reference following Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 742 “Sacred Origin Second Amendment” for more information.
Moving on to indirectly related recent news story: Sony / North Korea scenario – seems way too easy for Americans to “mouth off” about how brave they are about North Korean threats, especially since these Americans are not in North Korea’s immediate line of fire. Reader should recall that responses to North Korea should not be based on false vanity or fear; rather the observation that the primary bad guy player is a real “crazy” dictator; who would not have a problem launching rockets into South Korea and or Japan.
Another point to keep in mind, why should any American believe Obama without VERIFIABLE FACTS that indicate North Korea was involved. Has Reader forgotten Obama’s Administration’s lies about: Fast and Furious I; Fast and Furious II (Benghazi); IRS harassing conservative voters; Obama Care; or any other Obama lie Reader wishes to name?
Perhaps North Korea was involved in Sony / North Korea scenario; only a professional non-prejudicial not-propaganda motived investigation can provide what some call objective truth. TRUE or FALSE
One good thing about getting older is leaving some decisions to younger “smarter” people. TRUE or FALSE
Which side do Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall choose concerning Texas Open Carry? Answer is simple, we support policy which includes principle that liberty requires personal responsibility. TRUE not FALSE
Clue – Compare down sides to one upside – more freedom requires more personal responsibility.
Bonus question one – When public law enforcement cannot do, is to politically correct, or corrupt to do their jobs; pragmatic options might include private law enforcement. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Consider Southerners responses to “Yankee Conservative Republican Carpetbaggers” economic and political genocide against “deserving vanquished” following America’s first Civil War. Reader might review previously referenced Entry # 742 “Sacred Origin Second Amendment” for more information; plus also review “spirit of law” for Texas 1876 Constitution.
Bonus question two – Anytime Reader starts to agree with or believe Obama or his Administration; Reader might ask themselves if they are becoming demented since they suddenly find Obama to not be serial liar? TRUE or FALSE
Not a cue, just a bonus thought – What was old adage: “Have Gun – Will Travel”. Perhaps new interpretation, when Reader considers options for law abiding citizen-patriots; when cops have trouble protecting their own from liberal haters, might be: “Private Law Enforcement – Will Travel – For Silver”. Just asking, not suggesting. Reader might review definition of pragmatic.
Friday, December 19, 2014
Texas Drifter: Where Bouts Still Unknown
Library Entry # 764
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Texas Drifter noted that he wanted to improve his painting with words skills, much like artists often improve their painting with colors skills. Hope Reader enjoys following Texas Drifter lyrical visual prose (LVP) writing exercise – Editor Marshall.
“Where Bouts Still Unknown”
“More men of desperate character, desperate fortunes, and evil propensities congregated here during 2015 than ever got together in any other place on earth. As long as a principal carried their pistol in plain sight, every man he met would take his hat off to him. Another custom had much to commend its personal observance: the custom of the principal taking off their hat when passing the church at noon.”
Texas Drifter’s Unknown Second:
Stuck here near nowhere,
Coyotes are calling
Time for our serenade
Them blues they come,
Them blues they stay
Instead of saying good bye
I’ll just say
Green white white
Green white
Tonight’s thoughts about tomorrow
Rainbows follow Heaven’s tears,
Fade with clearing skies
Timing just wasn’t there,
In the wrong place
At the wrong time
They wanted a reputation
Bury them standing up,
One carcass left a diary
Felt a little fear
When victim’s aura
Gently soaked my soul
No time for tears
When you come up,
From the other side
Stuck here near no where
Coyotes are calling
Time for our serenade
Them blues they come,
Them blues they stay
Instead of saying good bye
I’ll just say
Green white white
Green white
Thinking of two gardens,
Wind shapes my limbs
Can’t see that force
April offers a bud,
Heat builds a petal
Drops with the leaves
Snow brings no shelter
Scattered seeds before death,
Intending to carry on
Apathy in the second
Their words always rhyme
Remembered as novels
Not started or read
The plastic never bloom
Leave traces of wax
Stuck here near nowhere
Coyotes are calling
Time for our serenade
Them blues they come,
Them blues they stay
Instead of saying good bye
I’ll just say
Green white white
Green white
Self, how many years
Never trusting or loving
Thought we would die
Maybe slavery is better
Heard ignorance is bliss,
Domestic war crimes are fun
Sure we’ve a future
Only some futures,
Longer than others
Our crime, reading the loser’s diary
Come on self, let’s go
Bastards am getting closer
No time for tears
When you come up,
From the other side
Stuck here near nowhere,
Coyotes are calling
Time for our serenade
Them blues they come,
them blues they stay
Instead of saying good bye
I’ll just say
Green white white
Green white
Them blues they come,
Them blues they stay
Instead of saying good bye
I’ll just say …
End this LVP writing exercise – Reader might check out Texas Drifter Rents Screenplay Concepts – Plus coming maybe soon “Texas Drifter: Legend of White Jaguar”.
Refresher Courtesy Dateline – Reader should feel free to download Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library to their personal files; so long as downloads are not edited and or used for commercial purposes. One example, free holiday gifts for Reader to enjoy and distribute; from Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall - reference Library Entry # 732 – “Marketing Memo for Editor Marshall” and M.LT.D. Library Index #759A.
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Texas Drifter: Obama Urinating on Free Cubans?
Library Entry # 763
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Title is more a non-metaphorical brutal observation, than a question. Free Cubans understand better than most Americans that justice delayed is not justice denied! Perhaps concept “and justice for all” should be changed to justice for a few just some of the time?
One word seemingly absent from all discussions about Obama’s recent amnesty plans for Cuba’s dictators is “justice”. Another brutal reality, there can be no moral or “just” normalization of relations between free Cubans and Cuba’s tyrants without justice for Cuba’s tyrants and their allies.
Reader should ask themselves if Castro’s murdered, tortured, imprisoned, and stole your grandparents and parents properties and heirlooms; would you not be seeking justice from Cuba’s tyrants for heinous crimes against your family members.
Seems that most Americans supporting Obama’s deals with Cuba’s tyrants are greedy internationalists like some American farmers, who should understand and know better; that selling their souls to evil fascist dictators to make “quick bucks” does not set standards for being noble honorable Americans. Perhaps a less desirable group are those willing to forget Hitler like crimes against millions of Cubans by Cuba’s dictators just to have access to few Cuban baseball players, just to improve America’s recreation past times.
Good starting point for justice based normalization with Cuba would be Americans overwhelmingly supporting free Cubans finding justice in conducting Nuremburg type trials?
Question is Obama using Sony/North Korea scenario to distract from Obama reaching out to financially rescue Cuba’s tyrants from Cuba’s economic resources losses from Venezuela and Putin’s Russia due to decreasing oil prices?
Perhaps Sony’s apparent lack of courage is due to non-dependability and apparent cowardice and ineptness of world’s most technological advanced military superpower – America under Obama Administration?
Then again, Reader’s aware many “law suit settlements” are strictly business decisions which are not based on either justice or honor? Perhaps Sony’s decision to carter to alleged problem causer North Korea whims were strictly based on business decisions. Then again, perhaps faking cowardice is good for politically correct free advertising.
Spectators to Sony / North Korea scenario, need to understand that “reasonable threats” when dealing with non-pragmatic crazy dictators can result in fools’ problems. Decision makers need to understand that North Korea’s over reaction could be lobbing missiles into South Korea or Japan; which could start an un-necessary war that could have been avoided by better managing one crazy dictator.
Generally those with real time on site intelligence can better analyze “crisis” problems than spectators. Hence importance of not letting Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats dishonor America’s intelligence services.
Back to title question, perhaps Obama is not only urinating on free Cubans, but also urinating on America’s citizen-patriots? Just a passing thought TRUE or FALSE
Another question, sometimes old people like Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall, “feel” to use good liberal word; that the world has changed and left us “old timers” behind. Perhaps most contemporary Americans do not mind having Progressive Democrats like Obama and his Administration, plus always lying Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats always urinating on us old people. TRUE or FALSE
One clue – where is recent 12-17-14 news report about federal judge ruling against Obama’s the dictator’s decree of amnesty for illegal immigrants? Reader might Google: “Federal judge rules Obama amnesty order unconstitutional power grab.”; for more information.
Second clue – Two older men, Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall seem to be only citizen-patriots at present that object to America’s Marxist fascist Democrats and corporate fascist Republicans urinating on them, on their Constitution plus Bill of Rights; and seems like every great American tradition, value, and principle? Would it be inappropriate to refer to Obama and all his allies including those Republican hating conservatives like Romney and Bush clans, plus others reader can list as being: wiz demons?
Bonus question, Watching some pretender conservatives advocate depriving free Cubans of justice; just so some corporate fascist conservatives can drool all over themselves from lust for greed at any price. Makes one believe that replacing Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama or any of his allies; with corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats like Romney or Bush clans or others read can list would not be any improvement; that is except for those who like their political leaders to urinate on them. TRUE or FALSE
Clue - Perhaps Americans should remember lesson learned by most free Cubans: justice delayed is not justice denied!
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Texas Drifter: Fragments of Truth?
Library Entry # 762
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Repetitive thought, repetition is good training tool until trainee learns lesson.
Fragment of truth one?
Some suggest that “peak oil” is “simply” point on financial sheets it cost to extract oil at a profit. Oil producers decrease “peak oil” by using technology to reduce cost of extracting oil? TRUE or FALSE
Clue – price of oil is determined by supply and demand like other ethical market prices and services. Seems Saudis are decreasing price of oil by increasing market supply of oil to destroy U.S. oil producers. Can reader find two possible solutions by referencing Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry# 760?
Another clue – Alternative energies are not currently cost effective for “community wide” distribution needs, and will remain uncompetitive corporate sector welfare for environmental corporate fascists; and will remain welfare for liberals for foreseeable future until alternative energy industries develop competitive private sector market production and distribution technologies.
Fragment of truth two?
As a few understand and many do not know: intelligence motives for: interviews; interrogations, and torture are totally different techniques.
Stating the obvious, none of above techniques work and will not work on those who “know nothing”; or have “nothing to spill”. TRUE or FALSE
Texas Drifter adheres to “old school” lessons, and believes that security forces jobs are not done when bad guys leave field of combat; assignment is complete once bad guys are tracked down and completely destroyed. Why, simple answer is so bad guys do not have opportunity to “re-group” to kill good guys or their allies and families on another day.
Reader can reference excerpt from Library Entry # 726 “Guide to Your Political Personality” - Patriot Security Conservatives, as well as most grownups understand that terrorists are not lawful combatants, and are not entitled to civilian constitutional due process legal systems; not entitled to Uniform Code of Military Justice legal processes; not entitled to Geneva Convention due processes for lawful combatant prisoners of war. Terrorists are only entitled to be interrogated for good intelligence, and eventually be summarily executed. TRUE or FALSE
Above observation raises issue what is difference between illegal immigrants committing capital crimes on American soil and terrorists murdering Americans on America soil? Are not both “classes” of victims just as dead? Perhaps illegal immigrants engaging in organized or other capital crimes on American soil should be treated like Islamic Nazi terrorists? If not, perhaps reader would like to explain why not?
Fragment of truth three?
Texas Drifter is still waiting for religious scholarly response to: Some readers might relate to one of most annoying inconveniences for older citizen-patriots; which is not remembering that which should be remembered. Like who was it, King James said: “and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.” Plus what was meant by comment “he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.”?
Fragment of truth four?
Legend has it that primary character in Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 713 “Two Tales for Same Dog”; that primary character has passed on too that place in the sky where old ranch scouts go. That aside, many have reported that “Dog” has never, and refuses to leave primary character’s grave site. Rumors are that some folks have even been dropping food and “warm beer” for “Dog” who refuses to leave his partner’s side.
Fragment of truth five?
Until Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas (R.G.V.N.Mx.,Tx.): 1. Totally stops influx of illegal immigrants who most all illegally migrate to R.G.V.NMx.,Tx. For welfare benefits; 2. Significantly reduces number of American citizen professional subsidy addicts (welfare recipients); with benefits paid for by Americans living outside R.G.V.N.Mx.,Tx. When the day arrives and it eventually will, when other Americans tire of financing R.G.V.N.Mx.,Tx professional welfare classes; R.G.V.N.Mx.,Tx will very likely end up as a Gaza Strip type environment. TRUE or FALSE
Clues: 1) Do Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas newspapers like VALLEY MORNING STAR in December 16, 2014 plus other editions promote propaganda for America last politicians with articles like Feinstein’s “Torture occurred, and we must own up to our actions”? A subscription issue for reader to decide on their own! 2) Reader can reference: Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 711 “PSC Porous Border Solutions”.
Fragment of truth six?
Covert reports suggest that CIA patriots have again saved Christmas for good little boys and girls by thwarting Obama’s plans to murder Santa! TRUE not FALSE
Clues: Reader can reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library # 754 Texas Drifter: “Christmas Story One - Will Obama Murder Santa?” plus # 753 Texas Drifter: “Christmas Story Two - History of The Manger” for more traditional Christmas story.
Bonus question, speaking only for myself Texas Drifter took an oath to uphold, protect, and defend from all enemies domestic and foreign. Do not recall anything in that oath about serving evil out of convenience. Reader can list some referenced evils.
Spiritual question for religious scholars, is it taking Heaven’s name in vain; to pray that Heaven damn some evil rabid souls to Hades for eternity? YES or NO
Two clues: Future history observations, first As Obama’s death care also known as Obama Care by Obama’s own admission seeks to by end of 2014, hopes to serve about nine million mostly illegal immigrants which represents about two to three percent of America’s total population; is cost of serving such a small percentage worth cost of destroying best health care industry and services in human history? How long before Obama’s allies of rats start abandoning Obama’s evil ship?
Second, how many of names of money lenders Heaven’s Son cast from the Temple can reader name? How many future Americans will remember celebrity Beck’s name in future decades? Just asking, not accusing.
Refresher Courtesy Dateline – Reader should feel free to download Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library to their personal files; so long as downloads are not edited and or used for commercial purposes. One example, free holiday gifts for Reader to enjoy and distribute; from Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall - reference Library Entry # 732 – “Marketing Memo for Editor Marshall” and M.LT.D. Library Index #759A.
Friday, December 12, 2014
Texas Drifter: America's 2016 Fantasy President
Library Entry # 761
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Seems reasonable that if so many Americans can spend much of their time on fantasy football leagues; why should citizen-patriots not spend time considering America’s 2016 Fantasy President?
To start to discussion process, Texas Drifter will put his 2016 Presidential candidate against any Reader’s 2016 fantasy Presidential candidate.
Texas Drifter’s criteria for selecting America’s 2016 and following President; perhaps meaningless exercise. How so, definition of fantasy: free play of creative imagination of mental images.
Selection criteria for America’s 2016 President. First observation, the position is not and should never be “on the job training” for rookie ideologues like Obama; or even conservative “rookie” ideologues like those citizen-patriots can list.
Required criteria for best 2016 Presidential choice
1. Intelligent with common sense not just “spoiled rich kids” educations.
2. Real world experiences in understanding domestic tranquility threats; national security threats, socialist threats to domestic capitalists, and “big dog always eats little dog” internationalist capitalism.
3. Abilities to define problems and identify achievable solutions in public format.
4. Maturity as adult; not one dependent on “daddy” blinded by own selfish vanities.
5. Proven capabilities managing world super power in dangerous world; made more dangerous by Obama and his destroy evil America allies.
6. Be grateful for blessings received from being an American with personal devotions to America’s traditions, values, principles which are illustrated by honoring his oath to uphold, protect, and defend from all enemies domestic and foreign.
7. Makes pragmatic individual decisions with no loyalties to special interest groups like corporate fascists; public unions; or establishment aristocrats like Bush or Romney clans. Serving as America’s President would give this individual opportunity to create a legacy of “Being his own man”.
8. Wants challenges which come with being American President.
9. Possesses courage to succeed at his goals, strategies, and objectives.
10. Remains loyal “best he can” (as man not false God) to: voters, followers, and allies that caused this 2016 Presidential candidate to win election.
11. Agrees to serve one four year term as President, and then help his Vice-President be elected to two consecutive four year terms as President.
This writing exercise started with: First observation, the position is not and should never be “on the job training” for rookie ideologues like Obama; or even conservative “rookie” ideologues like those, citizen-patriots can list.
The Vice-President choice for 2016 President can be more of a conservative ideologue than 2016 President, as Vice-President can use the four years serving under 2016 President as “on the job training” for his eight years as President. Why this process, 2016 President’s primary obligation will be to stop America’s decline which is totally different obligation than re-building America guided by America’s traditions, values, and principles.
Time has arrived at this point in America’s history for citizens-patriots to do what is best for Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic. How, by choosing to set aside their selfish vain lusts for personal gratifications; at expense of America’s future as well as their children’s and grandchildren’s futures. TRUE or FALSE
To re-use previously made comment; repletion is good training tool. Time has arrived at this point in America’s history for citizens-patriots to do what is best for Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic. How, by choosing to set aside their selfish vain lusts for personal gratifications; at expense of America’s future as well as their children’s and grandchildren’s futures. TRUE or FALSE
Texas Drifter as a “patriot security conservative” (PSC) is not naïve, and knows many vain and pretender conservatives will want to lynch Texas Drifter for making his best, following impartial never intended to be popular choice. Especially among politically correct liberal, conservative, and some libertarian P.C. Nazis; as too who meets above criteria and offers perhaps best choice for America’s 2016 Fantasy President.
Clue – All Texas Drifter asks of America’s best 2016 Fantasy President Candidate; is too not invite Texas Drifter to go quail hunting with him South Texas. Let the discussion begin, with reader’s choices which must include their 2016 fantasy President, meeting all above criteria. What say you my Reader?
First Bonus question, Texas Drifter’s security strategy is about winning not being popular among those who have at minimum been accessories to tolerating Obama’s Marxist-fascist evil transformation plans to destroy Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic. If reader does not have better plan to stop America’s decline and put America on right path over next twelve years. Perhaps Reader should just go home and play with his wife and kids?
Challenge from just another old farmer’s son, Texas Drifter, put your plan on the metaphorical table so America’s citizen-patriots can begin discussions which will hopefully avoid citizens-patriots from “eating each-others young’s futures” in upcoming primaries. Reasonable request. TRUE or FALSE
Second Bonus Question - McConnell and Boehner are fantasy leaders for real world America last fools who are too blanked up to know they are blanked up! TRUE or FALSE
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Texas Drifter: N.R. Internet Is Capitalists Best Friend Plus
Library Entry # 760
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Complete title is “Non-Regulated Internet Is Capitalists Best Friend Plus Several Questions”.
Some readers might relate to one of most annoying inconveniences for older citizen-patriots; which is not remembering that which should be remembered. Like who was it, King James said: “and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.” Plus what was meant by comment “he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.”?
Writing on to primary theme for this writing exercise, “Non-Regulated Internet Is Capitalists Best Friend Plus Several Questions”. Sad but brutally true, seems that good place to find examples of what is wrong with America can be found in “Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas”. (R.G.V.N.M., Texas)
Examples justifying unregulated internet offering alternatives to unethical capitalists ”price gouging” American citizens an legal residents in Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas. How and why, laundering drug cartel profits with inflated retail goods and services prices. Why, not only exploits non-price conscious Mexican aristocrats, but process also makes many R.G.V.N.M., Texas unethical capitalists blood stained fortunes.
Few Examples:
1. Inflated real estate sales prices to non-price conscious Mexican aristocrats, which also increases property taxes of R.G.V.N.M., Texas residents.
2. Inflated vehicles / motorcycles sales prices for Mexican buyers (One case, retailer refused sale to American citizen, his explanation: Why should he sell motorcycle to “local Valley person” for M.S.R.P. when he could get “lots more” from Mexican Nationals?)
3. Some vehicle / equipment maintenance parts are as much as five hundred to seven hundred percent above prices in comparable markets (Side note un-regulated internet can offer incredible savings in price gouging motivated market places.)
4. Excessive prices for “luxury” products; general merchandise; local medical services which cuts locals out of medical services market place
5. Reader can consider other examples which impartial research provides.
Reader will either grasp concept of unregulated internet being capitalists’ best friend in places like R.G.V.N.M., Texas. For who and by how, American citizens and legal residents; provided with an alternative to forced participation in R.G.V.N.M., Texas price gouging motivated market places. Or, reader will not grasp concept.
Like Republican leader McConnell and Boehner do not grasp concepts of being “conservative elected leaders” defending America’s traditions, values, and principles. It is doubtful that there are enough curse words in English language to describe McConnell and Boehner’s America last conduct.
Moving on to total uselessness of many surveys or polls relating to some issues in R.G.V.N.M., Texas. Many of these surveys and or polls seem to be created by and for marketing or propaganda interests. For either purely profit motivates; or special Marxist-fascist left wing lobby haters interests. One such survey concerning security attitudes towards cross border threats seemingly totally ignored conclusions’ validity. How, by ignoring any statistical randomness while gathering survey data. The R.G.V.N.M., Texas conclusions reported by local news media are probably worth less than recent U.S. Senate Democrats America last propagandizing efforts to destroy CIA.
Question: wanted reader’s best choice solution, Saudis seem to be “creating” current lower gas prices to gain support of American consumers. Why, to destroy American drilling interests on American soil. Why, to protect Saudis international monopoly oil baron status.
Two possible option for Americans, 1) put two year tariffs on Saudi oil imports onto American soil to temporarily protect American drilling oil interests; or 2) let market choose “survival of fittest” which absolutely requires Federal agencies like EPA and other environmental fascist groups to stop siding with America’s enemies; so America’s ingenuity and technology can return Saudis to being insignificant player in America’s carbon markets. TRUE or FALSE
Fox News reports about negative impact of America’s faltering economy on America’s middle class with descriptions like “last half decade” difficulties. Why does Fox News simply not report “problems caused during last five years of Obama’s Marxist Progressive Democrat Administration”? Fox News might be acting like lap licking Obama Administration closet supporter? TRUE or FALSE
Clue, If Fox News were really “fair and balanced”; why, do Fox News headlines not identify “Senate Democrats Propaganda Trashes CIA Patriots”? Perhaps someone should remind Fox News employees that simply parroting government propaganda is not ethical journalism. Reader can add their own clues to answer above question.
Bonus question – Spanish language lesson for American citizen-patriots, legal residents, and illegal immigrants: Mexico es tu casa, Mexico no es mi casa; America es mi casa, America no es tu casa.
Translation – go back to your own homes illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE
Clue, would someone please show Texas Drifter, where Americans’ constitutional due process rights transfer or extend to foreign nations; excluding territories within perimeters of American embassies on foreign soils. Where is it written, America’s constitutional rights extend to American citizens who are engaging in terrorist acts as non-uniformed assassins of Americans on foreign soils.
Bonus suggestion – Perhaps Americans should start wearing and or displaying “black colored ribbons” symbolizing death by evil, with Swastika on right side and “hammer and sickle” on left side. Why, to show their communities, country, and world that they are victims of, or opposed to Obama’s Marxist-fascist death care known by its victims as Obama Care?
Monday, December 8, 2014
Texas Drifter: Some Conservatives Join P.C. Lynch Mobs?
Library Entry #759
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Conservative celebrities that publicly hold media ratings trials, are comparable to Liberal Marxist-fascist Democrat lynch mobs; plus these same conservatives are no more intellectually honest than corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Neither seems to know different roles for grand juries and petit juries. Heaven’s First Commandment of Ten does not include exemptions for any conservative!
Why does Texas Drifter include so many definitions? One of America’s contemporary social problems is caused by Americans defining words by pop culture meanings; rather than using definitions intended by America’s Founding Fathers. Examples:
1. He is so cool; does word mean cool from weather conditions or cool as pop culture tribute?
2. Like many racial haters believe “I’m dreaming of a white Christmas” is racist slur as opposed to “white” referring to snow. (Perhaps some are just too blanked up to know they are too blanked up to survive freedom?)
3. Not distinguishing between role of grand jury and role of petit jury.
Some definitions:
1. Petit - small or minor
2. Petit jury – twelve (12) persons impaneled to try and decide finally the facts at issue in causes for trial in court
3. Grand - having more importance than others
4. Grand jury – citizens that examine accusations against person charged with crime/s; to determine if evidence warrants making formal charges on which the accused person is later tried before petit jury.
Beyond definitions, some suggest grand jury was named “grand” when its member numbers surpassed twelve members of petit jury. Following should help reader better understand themes of this writing exercise.
(Some excerpts from) BEHIND THE LOCKED DOOR OF AN AMERICAN GRAND JURY: ITS HISTORY, ITS SECRECY, AND ITS PROCESS - MARK KADISH - Copyright © 1996 Florida State University Law Review
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of our Constitution is to create a government that protects people from each other.[1] The purpose of our Bill of Rights is to protect each of us from our government.[2] Fundamental in any ordered system of government is an understanding that the people have the right to be free from crime. But, even more important, the people have a right to be free from a government that takes life, liberty, and property without due process of law.
This Article focuses on whether the development, interpretation, and administration of federal grand jury secrecy provisions has adhered to due process strictures. …
Part II of this Article is an historical analysis. It examines the grand jury system as it originated in England and developed in colonial America. Part II also focuses on the evolution of the grand jury's function from a powerful tool for the monarch to a shield protecting citizens from the king's abuses.
II. THE HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH AND COLONIAL GRAND JURIES
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "our constitutional grand jury was intended to operate substantially like its English progenitor."[21] An historical analysis of the grand jury thus helps to assess the role secrecy plays in the modern American grand jury system. This analysis reveals that grand jury secrecy serves two competing functions, which courts should enforce in a manner that equitably balances both roles.
A. The Grand Jury in England
The earliest progenitor of our grand jury had two main functions: to accuse criminals [22] and to extend the central government throughout England. …
Significantly, in 1215, King John was forced by his barons to sign the Magna Carta, which delineated individual protections of life, liberty, and property by order of law.[44] This revered document did not specifically address the issue of grand jury secrecy. It did, however, introduce the concept of due process against which any procedural practice must be measured.[45]
In 1642, the English legal philosopher Edward Coke [50] interpreted the Magna Carta provision "Nullus liber homo capiatur, aut imprisonetur" as preserving life, liberty, and property subject to the "law of the land."[51] William Blackstone interpreted Coke's "law of the land" to require a two-tier process before a person could be deprived of (at least) life.[52] The vote by the grand jury in the first proceeding determined whether there was probable cause to believe that the individual accused was guilty of the crime charged; the vote by the petit jury in the second proceeding determined whether there was enough evidence to convict.[53] The petit jury provided little protection to the innocent accused, however, because the king often fined or imprisoned jurors who refused to convict.[54] Reacting to this monarchical abuse, the grand juries began to shift their focus away from mere accusation to considerations of fairness for the individual accused.[55]
Two celebrated cases became the catalyst for writers to define the rights and powers of English grand juries.[56] When pro-Protestant grand juries in London refused to indict Catholic King Charles II's enemies, Lord Shaftesbury and Stephen Colledge,[57] the grand jury became an institution "capable of being a real safeguard for the liberties of the subject."[58] For the first time, grand juries were positively identified as something other than enforcement agencies of central government; they also existed for the protection of the accused.[59] (End excerpts) – Editor Marshall’s Note – well worth Reader’s time to review entire text.
Translation America’s Revolution helped refine the role of grand jury and its relationship to petit juries. Grand juries are more significant than petit jury trials in criminal justice systems. Texas Drifter is not suggesting that government prosecutors motivated solely by their personal career advancements through their conviction ratios, have not damaged integrity of grand jury system in America. That issue is best left for another writing exercise.
Writing exercise intermission question – It is up to America’s States and citizen-patriots to protect Tenth Amendment from federal government; not federal government to protect Tenth Amendment for States and citizens-patriots. Why, feds hate Tenth Amendment for being feds “Achilles heel”. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – A question, were Constitution and Bill of Rights written to protect federal government from States and citizen-patriots; or written to protect citizen-patriots and States from federal government?
Back from writing exercise intermission. Starting with few obvious observations. First, students remember answers longer when they look up answers for themselves. Question, why is secrecy important component for grand jury processes? Reader can practice old adage.
Following steps of due process justice depends on one word, what is that word?
1. Grand juries
2. Petit juries
3. Appellate Courts
4. Supreme Court
That word is ________.
Clue – not favoring one person or side more than another, impartial.
Purpose of due process steps relying on impartiality is to minimize mistakes in an imperfect word; and can be facilitated by staffing system using following:
1. Best selective recruitment which does not include selecting any staff with Affirmative Action policies;
2. Best training and continued training
3. Best supervision or command structure which does not promote incompetent or unethical “up bureaucracy” instead of terminating their employment
4. Best continued oversight by citizen-patriots through different means; which are best left for another writing exercise
Question, America’s future seems dismal as “sixties generation” of America haters will be getting worse as dementia sets in and makes these getting more senile by the day old people more just plain evil and mean. Especially since Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats like McConnell, Cornyn, Boehner, plus Bush and Romney Clans want to show their compassions for those trying to destroy America’s conservatives. TRUE of FALSE
Bonus question, recent grand jury “no bills” of law enforcement officers in Missouri and New York prove that some conservatives are either fools or hypocrites. Why, video tapes do not represent entire scenario facts. Many conservative celebrities who ignore realities that even “on scene participants and witnesses” may not have all the facts impartial grand juries have access too! TRUE or FALSE
Clue - Conservative celebrities that publicly hold media ratings trials, are comparable to Liberal Marxist- fascist Democrat lynch mobs; plus these same conservatives are no more intellectually honest than corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Neither seems to know different roles for grand juries and petit juries.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Conservative celebrities that publicly hold media ratings trials, are comparable to Liberal Marxist-fascist Democrat lynch mobs; plus these same conservatives are no more intellectually honest than corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Neither seems to know different roles for grand juries and petit juries. Heaven’s First Commandment of Ten does not include exemptions for any conservative!
Why does Texas Drifter include so many definitions? One of America’s contemporary social problems is caused by Americans defining words by pop culture meanings; rather than using definitions intended by America’s Founding Fathers. Examples:
1. He is so cool; does word mean cool from weather conditions or cool as pop culture tribute?
2. Like many racial haters believe “I’m dreaming of a white Christmas” is racist slur as opposed to “white” referring to snow. (Perhaps some are just too blanked up to know they are too blanked up to survive freedom?)
3. Not distinguishing between role of grand jury and role of petit jury.
Some definitions:
1. Petit - small or minor
2. Petit jury – twelve (12) persons impaneled to try and decide finally the facts at issue in causes for trial in court
3. Grand - having more importance than others
4. Grand jury – citizens that examine accusations against person charged with crime/s; to determine if evidence warrants making formal charges on which the accused person is later tried before petit jury.
Beyond definitions, some suggest grand jury was named “grand” when its member numbers surpassed twelve members of petit jury. Following should help reader better understand themes of this writing exercise.
(Some excerpts from) BEHIND THE LOCKED DOOR OF AN AMERICAN GRAND JURY: ITS HISTORY, ITS SECRECY, AND ITS PROCESS - MARK KADISH - Copyright © 1996 Florida State University Law Review
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of our Constitution is to create a government that protects people from each other.[1] The purpose of our Bill of Rights is to protect each of us from our government.[2] Fundamental in any ordered system of government is an understanding that the people have the right to be free from crime. But, even more important, the people have a right to be free from a government that takes life, liberty, and property without due process of law.
This Article focuses on whether the development, interpretation, and administration of federal grand jury secrecy provisions has adhered to due process strictures. …
Part II of this Article is an historical analysis. It examines the grand jury system as it originated in England and developed in colonial America. Part II also focuses on the evolution of the grand jury's function from a powerful tool for the monarch to a shield protecting citizens from the king's abuses.
II. THE HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH AND COLONIAL GRAND JURIES
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "our constitutional grand jury was intended to operate substantially like its English progenitor."[21] An historical analysis of the grand jury thus helps to assess the role secrecy plays in the modern American grand jury system. This analysis reveals that grand jury secrecy serves two competing functions, which courts should enforce in a manner that equitably balances both roles.
A. The Grand Jury in England
The earliest progenitor of our grand jury had two main functions: to accuse criminals [22] and to extend the central government throughout England. …
Significantly, in 1215, King John was forced by his barons to sign the Magna Carta, which delineated individual protections of life, liberty, and property by order of law.[44] This revered document did not specifically address the issue of grand jury secrecy. It did, however, introduce the concept of due process against which any procedural practice must be measured.[45]
In 1642, the English legal philosopher Edward Coke [50] interpreted the Magna Carta provision "Nullus liber homo capiatur, aut imprisonetur" as preserving life, liberty, and property subject to the "law of the land."[51] William Blackstone interpreted Coke's "law of the land" to require a two-tier process before a person could be deprived of (at least) life.[52] The vote by the grand jury in the first proceeding determined whether there was probable cause to believe that the individual accused was guilty of the crime charged; the vote by the petit jury in the second proceeding determined whether there was enough evidence to convict.[53] The petit jury provided little protection to the innocent accused, however, because the king often fined or imprisoned jurors who refused to convict.[54] Reacting to this monarchical abuse, the grand juries began to shift their focus away from mere accusation to considerations of fairness for the individual accused.[55]
Two celebrated cases became the catalyst for writers to define the rights and powers of English grand juries.[56] When pro-Protestant grand juries in London refused to indict Catholic King Charles II's enemies, Lord Shaftesbury and Stephen Colledge,[57] the grand jury became an institution "capable of being a real safeguard for the liberties of the subject."[58] For the first time, grand juries were positively identified as something other than enforcement agencies of central government; they also existed for the protection of the accused.[59] (End excerpts) – Editor Marshall’s Note – well worth Reader’s time to review entire text.
Translation America’s Revolution helped refine the role of grand jury and its relationship to petit juries. Grand juries are more significant than petit jury trials in criminal justice systems. Texas Drifter is not suggesting that government prosecutors motivated solely by their personal career advancements through their conviction ratios, have not damaged integrity of grand jury system in America. That issue is best left for another writing exercise.
Writing exercise intermission question – It is up to America’s States and citizen-patriots to protect Tenth Amendment from federal government; not federal government to protect Tenth Amendment for States and citizens-patriots. Why, feds hate Tenth Amendment for being feds “Achilles heel”. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – A question, were Constitution and Bill of Rights written to protect federal government from States and citizen-patriots; or written to protect citizen-patriots and States from federal government?
Back from writing exercise intermission. Starting with few obvious observations. First, students remember answers longer when they look up answers for themselves. Question, why is secrecy important component for grand jury processes? Reader can practice old adage.
Following steps of due process justice depends on one word, what is that word?
1. Grand juries
2. Petit juries
3. Appellate Courts
4. Supreme Court
That word is ________.
Clue – not favoring one person or side more than another, impartial.
Purpose of due process steps relying on impartiality is to minimize mistakes in an imperfect word; and can be facilitated by staffing system using following:
1. Best selective recruitment which does not include selecting any staff with Affirmative Action policies;
2. Best training and continued training
3. Best supervision or command structure which does not promote incompetent or unethical “up bureaucracy” instead of terminating their employment
4. Best continued oversight by citizen-patriots through different means; which are best left for another writing exercise
Question, America’s future seems dismal as “sixties generation” of America haters will be getting worse as dementia sets in and makes these getting more senile by the day old people more just plain evil and mean. Especially since Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats like McConnell, Cornyn, Boehner, plus Bush and Romney Clans want to show their compassions for those trying to destroy America’s conservatives. TRUE of FALSE
Bonus question, recent grand jury “no bills” of law enforcement officers in Missouri and New York prove that some conservatives are either fools or hypocrites. Why, video tapes do not represent entire scenario facts. Many conservative celebrities who ignore realities that even “on scene participants and witnesses” may not have all the facts impartial grand juries have access too! TRUE or FALSE
Clue - Conservative celebrities that publicly hold media ratings trials, are comparable to Liberal Marxist- fascist Democrat lynch mobs; plus these same conservatives are no more intellectually honest than corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Neither seems to know different roles for grand juries and petit juries.
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Texas Drifter: Open Letter to Texas Governor-elect Greg Abbott
Library Entry # 758
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Theme for this writing exercise is updating Texas “concealed carry legislation” to include protecting life, health, liberty, and property threats from feral human conduct. Texas Drifter is not asking for new Texas law; just including three words “feral human conduct” to apply to crimes committed during riots.
As Federal laws or regulations cannot SUPERSEDE Spirit of Law or letter of law of Tenth Amendment; any such Texas updated legislation should include immunity from any and all criminal and civil liability? Why not as many insurance policies do not cover damage resulting from civil strife? Texas legislative updates should publicly state that Texas is exercising inalienable rights identified as Spirit of Law in Declaration of Independence; and letter of law defined in United States Constitution Bill of Rights Tenth Amendment!
Definition of feral is description of animal that lives and grows in the wild after being domesticated; comparable description is wild or savage animal.
Description of feral human conduct can include Obama’s racist rioters engaging in violent behavior which threatens citizens’ lives, health, liberties, and properties.
Definition of conduct is standard of personal behavior based on moral principles.
Feral human conduct can be reflected in individual, packs, and herds conducting themselves as rabid souled wild savage animals.
Generic Feral Hog Observations; Reader might compare traits to humans engaging in feral conduct.
1. Highly adaptable to different environments
2. Opportunistic omnivores
3. Extreme intra sexual aggression between boars
4. Rapid reproduction rates
5. Most wildlife do not associate with feral hogs
6. Most dangerous in groups
7. Have very few natural predators
8. Survive avoiding contact with humans
9. Attracted to gunshot like some bears looking for “left over” meals
10. Some estimates cause guesstimated two billion dollars plus year in economic losses
11. Some suggest that there are fewer deceased illegal immigrants found in Texas brush lands called “Monte” not because fewer illegal immigrants crossing America’s Southern porous border; rather feral hogs are consuming “weakened living” and taking meals out of beaks of native scavengers.
12. Reader can add other similar traits between feral hogs and humans engaging in feral human conduct.
Self-defense principles based on Spirit of the Law can be referenced in many Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entries like # 742 – “Sacred Origin Second Amendment”.
Motives for violent crimes that threaten life, health, liberty, and property include but may not be limited to following.
1. Lust for greed like bank robbery, robbing a liquor store, armed robbery, drug dealing, kidnapping, and related crimes
2. Ideological tactics like those used by Islamic NAZI terrorists; Islamic State; Black race haters; and others Reader can list
3. Psychopathic violence like that perpetuated by “just plain blanking crazy people” plus other examples Reader can list, including mental health problems which might result from drug addiction like Driving Under Influence deaths and injuries
4. Sociopathic violent crimes by those engaging in human feral conduct like that exhibited in social justice racist riots.
5. Other crimes like arson can be included in above when appropriate
Back step concerning above item number four, sociopathic feral humans include Obama’s social justice racist rioters who conduct themselves like Adolf’s Brown Shirts. When, in acts of violent terrorism against innocent men, women, and children that Obama felt didn’t appreciate messiah Obama’s greatness!
Many contemporary Obama’s social justice racist rioters engaging in feral human conduct include “uneducated” Blacks motivated by hate because the world owes these perpetual victims everything. Many in this group include spoiled rich kids infatuated with anarchist or Marxist-fascist ideologies. Why, simple answer is shame their parents for raising spoiled brats.
America’s future generation of world owes us America haters, will probably be children of illegal immigrants’ whose parents came to America to live off stolen property called welfare benefits which in many cases could vary between forty thousand to fifty thousand dollars a year in tax free monies, benefits, and services.
Why note this, America’s future feral human rioters and criminals could be contemporary illegal immigrant children unconstitutionally granted by Obama; amnesty which was condoned by silence of Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Reader can list Obama’s offensive Republican allies.
Repetition is still good training tool. Self-defense principles based on Spirit of the Law can be referenced in many Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entries like # 742 – “Sacred Origin Second Amendment”.
(SOME EXCERPTS from Texas Law Shield)
• The State of Texas Justification for the Use of Force & Deadly Force:
In Texas, there are several situations where a person is justified in using force or deadly force.
A person may use force against another to the degree the person believes that it is reasonably necessary to protect themselves or a third person from another’s unlawful use of force.
In Texas it is presumed that deadly force was reasonably necessary if it is used against an individual who was unlawfully or forcibly entering or entered into an occupied home, business, or vehicle or is attempting to forcibly remove another against his or her will from an occupied home, business, or vehicle. Deadly force is also presumed to be justified to prevent the commission or attempted commission of murder, aggravated kidnapping, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery and aggravated robbery.
In Texas if a person is present in any place where they have a right to be, they have no duty to retreat and have the right to use force, including deadly force, if they reasonably believe that it is necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury to themselves or to prevent the commission of murder, aggravated kidnapping, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery or aggravated robbery.
Texas law allows a person to use force in the protection of property to prevent or terminate another’s trespass or other unlawful interference with the possession of real or personal property. Deadly force can be used in Texas when the crime against property is classified as arson, burglary, robbery, criminal mischief at night or theft at night.
NOTE: Any of the above information is solely a general legal discussion of the law in Texas and should not be considered as giving legal advice, nor creating an attorney-client relationship. Your situation may be different so contact an attorney regarding your personal circumstances. Please call our office for more information. (End Excerpts) Editor Marshall’s Note: Reader should review entire Texas Law Shield Text
Texas is a CCP State and Texans should not start tolerating lack of sufficient law enforcement to prevent following feral human activities.
1. Riots
2. Looting
3. “Torching” any property private or public
4. Terrorizing customers on private property in private businesses
5. Physically assaulting old man with old person’s very own “oxygen” bottle
6. Terrorizing women and children with terroristic threats in Malls
7. Terrorizing children trying to sing Christmas songs with terrorist threats
8. All above plus many other feral human violent acts condoned by Obama’s “code” talk and mannerisms in name of social justice to lynch a police officer engaging n due process determined self defense
Needed CCP Legislation updates required – Feral human conduct is a specific criminal act like murder, robbery, kidnapping arson and other specific crimes Reader can list. Texas State Legislators should enact with Texas’ New Governor legislation which inserts “feral human conduct” into” “Justification for the Use of Force & Deadly Force” Statutes. Also included, since many insurance policies do not cover damages during “civil strife” or any other “catch word” insurance companies use; Texas updated legislation should include immunity from any and all criminal and civil liability; based on Texas exercising Tenth Amendment to United States Constitution Bill of Rights.
Texas Drifter is requesting that Texans and other citizen patriots who support basic concepts of this writing exercise; pass on this “Open Letter to Texas Governor-elect Greg Abbott” for consideration.
Why, some clues are worth repeating as repetition is good teaching tool. Perhaps Reader waits too long to honor their oath to uphold, protect, and defend: Scenario: international terrorists, illegal immigrant criminals entering America through Southern porous border, or Obama’s activists engaging in feral human conduct; breaks in to Reader’s home; cuts conservative’s throat and throws him to floor. While conservative’s life sustaining blood is spreading across floor, conservative increasingly faintly sees and hears his wife and children being sexually assaulted and brutally murdered. Why, simple because there are some domestic tranquility and national security problems, that can never be resolved just with words or letter of laws ignoring Spirit of Law. Just warning, not advocating.
Editor Marshall’s Note for some of Texas Drifter’s students tag: other reference materials updates, can be found at texasdrifterreadbeforeyoubuy.blogspot.com (to) View My complete Profile (to) ML Dateline Volume III (to) Tx D Volume 2 (Spy As a Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance) (to) <23> Page 44 and insert into notes where appropriate:
1. Feral human conduct scenarios are likely to involve multiple attackers from small packs to herds
2. Techniques: pre-count to know confrontation “steps” yours and bad guys
3. Decision making stops when reflexes begin
4. Disciplined reflexes are not affected by emotions; and improve with constant training also called practice
Here’s hoping Reader acts on most important part of this writing exercise: Texas Drifter is requesting that Texans and other citizen patriots who support basic concepts of this writing exercise; pass on this “Open Letter to Texas Governor-elect Greg Abbott” for consideration.
Monday, December 1, 2014
Texas Drifter: Warning Not Advocating
Library Entry # 757
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Adolf had his “Brown Shirts”; Obama has his social justice “racist rioters”. Seems social justice for Obama is political correct code word for mob rule. Translation, Obama’s contempt for Constitutional due process justice seems verified by Obama’s devotion, addiction, and dependence on using hate to incite riots to “lynch” innocent people.
“Warning,” it is better to pull up weeds by their roots before weeds go to seed. “Not advocating,” Texas Drifter is not Reader’s babysitter; so if Reader lets Obama’s racist rioters, who are comparable to Adolf’s Brown Shirts, seeds spread. Reader has only themselves to blame for losing America’s traditions, values, and principles to Obama’s Marxist-fascist transformations! TRUE or FALSE
Clues, too many masters ruin well trained disciplined dogs. Are there any Federal Government laws that crossing State lines to incite riots are crimes? Guess not under Obama’s make it up as Obama goes laws.
Following writing exercise sections guide for Reader,
1. Purpose
2. Players
3. Strategies
4. Observations
5. Questions
6. Refresher Courtesy Dateline
PURPOSE
When security consultants provide advice; their report is more akin to being a warning than advocating, as being client/s’ babysitter are different kinds of services. Sample, if one is determined to take five gallon propane “bottle” into a non-ventilated room; then open the valve; and start playing with matches? When security consultant advises client that his actions might create an explosion that could cause serious or fatal injuries; such information is a warning not advocating.
Purpose of this writing exercise is to warn citizen-patriots that one of many of Obama’s threats to America’s constitutional republic is total destruction of Constitutional due process justice. How could Obama achieve such objectives, by initiating and implementing hate motivated political correct (PC) NAZI lynch mob rule by racist rioters?
PLAYERS
1. Good Guys citizen-patriots: Reader can add specifics
2. Bad Guys Domestic
- Marxist-Fascists: Reader can add specifics
- Corporate Fascists: Reader can add specifics
- World owes me haters: Reader can add specifics
- World owes me public subsidy addicts: Reader can add specifics
- Bureaucrat agencies with fascist personalities like EPA plus others Reader can add to list
- America hating illegal immigrants only here for what they can steal
Question, should compassion for Bad Guys (seeking to turn America into third word fascist country), also known as “sucking up” or lap licking by Republicans establishment ruling class aristocrats be options best left for quitters, compromisers, and those willing to surrender just to be popular among America last crowd? Reader can list offending internationalist corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats by name.
STRATEGIES
1. Embarrass “out of Republican Party” conservative pretenders with “glass house truths”- Reader can reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 686 “Conservative’s Security Primer”
2. Marshall's Up Close and Personal tactic – excerpt from MLTDL Entry # 599 - A more complex up close and personal tactic, accepts the premise that once the time for talking has passed, there are only three options: run and hide, standoff tactics, or hit and run.
Napoleon’s version of hit and run requires decimating the first target, and striking the second target with dazzling speed and methodical ferocity. Napoleon’s divide and conquer strategies, as brilliant as they were, depended on insuring that the first target attacked did not recover and reappear on the home team’s flank.
Not “finishing off’ the first target attacked; creates unnecessary threats that have to be dealt with later. Marshall’s social power formula can help determine the first target.
Perhaps a more cost effective “hit and run” strategy is to use pro-active counter intelligence activities to create mistrust and hatred between enemy allies. Letting the enemy sides fight it out, makes it easier for the home team to manage or destroy a weaker “winning” enemy ally. (End excerpt) Translation get bag guys “one and two” to start throwing each other under metaphorical bus.
OBSERVATIONS
First Set Observations:
1. Citizen-patriots must be able to distinguish between “in public” and behind closed door” ethics. Consider following: Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats tactics are promise conservatives one set of promises in public, but act on internationalist corporate fascist goals, objectives, and values behind closed doors (Reader can list offenders). Minor discrepancies can be found by conservatives in public who act like traditional politicians behind closed doors. Example, Texas Senator Cruz seems to be “solid conservative” in both public and in private. Although Senator Cruz seems to revert back to typical politicians in one instance. When one of his constituents sends him a specific issue letter; his response tends to be generic filler which has nothing to do with constituent’s original question.
Why such untrustworthy conduct? These political animals’ sole lust for power is to keep power through vanity motivated media ratings.
2. Citizen-patriots must learn that Marxist-fascists are always pathological liars and America last haters; with even more hatred of all American patriots not only in public with even more evil plans behind closed doors.
Why such soul less evil conduct? These political animals values and principles are based on win at any cost for their they are true gods, chosen to manage their fanatic ideology Marxist-fascism; much as Islamic NAZI terrorists share devotions to destroy all political adversaries.
Second Set Observations:
1. Purpose for above information – biggest problem for automated security targeting systems like Marshall’s ACP System is distinguishing targets from non-targets in target selection processes.
Examples “bad guys” racist rioter terrorists target everyone including innocent collateral damage victims; while good guys as seen by recent Israeli efforts try to minimize civilian collateral damages by limiting target selections to bad guys.
Reader might reference MLTDL Entry # 681 for more specific information.
2. Conservatives are not a monolithic group as are most other political, economic, religious, or social groups. Some examples which get “blended”
- Yankee Conservatives
- Southern Conservatives
- Constitutional Conservatives
- Social Conservatives
- Economic Conservatives
- Libertarian Conservatives
- Patriotic Security Conservatives
Some Bad Conservative can include
- Yankee Carpetbagger Conservatives
- Southern Scalawag Conservatives
- Media Ratings Motivated Pretender Conservatives
- Corporate Fascist Conservatives
- Internationalist Anti Nationalist Conservatives
- Cult Leader / False Prophet Conservatives
- Specifics about above bad guys found in other Texas Drifter writing exercises
Third Set of Observations:
- Letter of law not defined by spirit of the law can become criminal letter of the law. Reader might reference MLTD Library Entry # 652 “Justice For All Includes Conservatives”. Example of how spirit of law ignored creates evil letter of the law. “Spirit of Law” for Fourteenth Amendment references slaves and immediate descendants and had and has absolutely nothing do about guaranteed amnesty rights for illegal immigrants who voluntarily entered America that were not brought to America as slaves.
- Problem with abandoning Spirit of Law for letter of law is twofold: first creation of laws serving tyrants not citizen patriots. Second creating an attitude that oath to uphold protect and defend were intended to be followed only if judicial decision were to be popular?
- Good starting point would be to ask Justice “Judas” Roberts he seems to like abandoning Spirit of Law for Letter of law. TRUE or FALSE
QUESTIONS:
1. Law abiding citizen-patriots have moral right to expect that criminals breaking both Spirit of Law and Letter of Law are not entitled to financially benefit from poison fruit of poisons tree. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – By some estimates, illegal immigrants could receive as much as forty thousand to sixty thousand a year in non-taxable dollars, services, benefits, and other freebies.
2. Bonus question, where is honor or common sense in waking up some morning and realizing –“I waited too long to do what was right and save my America; now it is too late to save Heaven’s favorite republic for my children, and other future American generations”? (Reader can insert answer in five words or less.)
Clue to let Reader know; Reader waited too long to honor their oath to uphold, protect, and defend: Scenario: terrorists or illegal immigrant criminals entering America through Southern porous border; breaks in to Reader’s home; cuts conservative’s throat and throws him to floor. While conservative’s life sustaining blood is spreading across floor, conservative increasingly faintly sees and hears his wife and children being sexually assaulted and brutally murdered. Why, simple because there are some domestic tranquility and national security problems, that can never be resolved just with words or letter of laws ignoring Spirit of Law. Just warning, not advocating.
Refresher Courtesy Dateline – Reader should feel free to download Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library to their personal files; so long as downloads are not edited and or used for commercial purposes. One example, free holiday gifts for Reader to enjoy and distribute; from Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall - reference Library Entry # 732 – “Marketing Memo for Editor Marshall” and M.LT.D. Library Index Entry # 579A.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)