Texas Drifter: Fascist Due Process Laws Bad?

Library Entry # 737

Marshall’s Law Dateline – One of first lessons an old field experienced intelligence agent, taught Texas Drifter: professionals have courage to ask clients questions; that clients may not have courage to answer.

Concept for this writing exercise, question is not if rule of law exists; rather whose rule of law exists?

Some contemporary due process rule of law options for Americans include

I. Feral Soul-less Evil Bad Guys

1. Islamic Nazi Terrorists Sharia Law
2. Illegal immigrants America "owes us bandits" laws
3. Oath to Constitution breaking Satan serving, activist federal judges make it up as they go laws
4. Progressive Democrat Marxist-fascists claiming to be perpetual victims with their America hating laws
5. Washington D.C. Republican establishment corporate fascists lust for greed laws

II. Patriot Good Guys Due Process Laws

1. Judeo-Christian constitutional ethical capitalists
2. Libertarians
3. Reagan “Blue Collar – Hard Hat” Democrats
4. Others reader can list including Patriot Security Conservatives (PSC)

Observation: Sometimes “only words” strategies and or tactics may not be sufficient for enforcers of due process constitutional laws to preserve constitutional integrity and or domestic tranquility.

Brief history of domestic and or foreign threats, not resolved only by words to Americans’ due process laws preserving inalienable rights or constitutional mandates: America’s Revolution 1776; Whiskey Rebellion 1791; War Barbary Pirates Terrorism; War of 1812; Texas War for Independence from Mexico; Mexico’s War against America 1846; U.S. Civil War; Indian Wars; Spanish War; World War I; Mexican Bandit Wars Against Americans early 1900's; World War II; Korean War; Vietnam War; (Reader can list other threats domestic and foreign to present)

Reader can list other successful strategies and tactics other than “only words” to enforce and preserve due process laws.

Lots of Americans are smarter than Texas Drifter; so this is perfect opportunity for them to publish words explaining how above observations are incorrect.

Question, real time reality threats cannot always be prevents or neutralized by using fancy words, or drooling good intentions. Example? – Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas will continue to evolve into aristocratic–peasant third world culture unless BOTH of following geometric population trends are resolved;
1. Influx of illegal immigrants becoming de facto American citizens is stopped and reversed with deportation not amnesty.
2. Growth of public subsidy addicts through public welfare recipients; non-producing welfare supporting public bureaucrats, and regulatory public bureaucrats are decreased and their anti- ethical capitalist regulations abolished.

TRUE or FALSE

Two clues: Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry numbers - # 735 and # 686.

Bonus question – TRUE or FALSE - Perhaps patriotic Americans thanks to not one single successful domestic or foreign policy in six years by Obama and Obama’s supporters should what? Should bring back the “N” word; not as a racial slur, rather to profile any governments elected, appointed, and or employed bureaucrats who are just too blanked up to know that they are permanently blanked up.

Could one such example include CDC acting like “N” word since CDC spokes-persons seem to believe their employers American taxpayers are just too childlike to handle little more than little bit of truth about Ebola at a time? Are not American citizens entitled since they are paying CDC spokes-persons salaries to be told truth as limited as truth may be about Ebola; rather than CDC promoting hopeful lies about how hopefully things will work out? TRUE or FALSE

Future bonus question, Is Texas U.S. Senator Ted Cruz morphing into Republican Establishment lap licker? What are reader’s choices when Cruz publicly endorses Republican establishment ruling class aristocrat candidates, who live to destroy Republican conservative candidates? Same establishment Republicans have also been known to cheat Republican conservatives out of “entitled” primary election victories.