Library Entry # 730
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Reality is not compassionate or fair; there are no “do overs” in real world self-defense scenarios.
Consider just a few of Obama’s foreign policy strategies.
1. Bomb Islamic State claimed territory in Syria.
2. Arm and train “moderate” anti-Syria government rebels to fight Islamic State spread across Syria and Iraq.
Few possible problems with Obama’s strategy:
1. Syria objects to foreign governments bombing Islamic State terrorists without Syria’s permission within Syria’s “sovereign” national boundaries; especially since Obama’s policies will be arming and training Syria’s domestic enemies after Islamic State has been destroyed.
2. What it if Syria uses Putin or Iranian missiles (which Syria has access too) to shoot down American or coalition member planes (new phrase flying platforms)?
3. What will Obama’s responses be too unintended consequences of Obama’s destroy Islamic State strategies?
Why should Syria government support moderate Syrian Rebels against Islamic State; if these same Syrian rebels will probably turn on Syria which also could threaten Putin’s Russia and Iranian geo-political interests?
Old school national security combat reality; unintended consequences of hastily made pre-combat decisions can have fatal decisions. Consider examples of Colonel James Fannin at Goliad in Texas Revolution, and General Custer and his troops’ fate during American Indian Wars.
Consider how Americans will take to Bush II and Romney clans’ compassion for all things Mexican, if Mexico (which it would not) carried out bombing raids on U.S. soil to destroy Mexico cartels without U.S. government’s permission.
Texas Drifter is not suggesting that every single Islamic State citizen and ally should not be efficiently terminated by every American resource available in pre-emptive self-defense actions. Another old school realty: ignoring any player or players’ impact in self-defense situations can get one hurt or worse - killed; same old school standard applies to national security scenarios.
Reader might reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library - Number 721 Texas Drifter: Obama Policies Incite Using Nukes? Reader might also reference Library Number 681 Texas Drifter: Patriots Artificial Intelligence System to better grasp following.
Often times great promise makers, campaigners, and propagandists like Obama have spent their entire careers surviving on their abilities to con people and lie their way out of problems. At the same time, these same serial liars may not understand principles based on reality; that “might” (social power) may or may not make right but determine outcomes.
Recall formula: social power equals quantity (1) plus quality (2) over timing. Of specific interest for this writing exercise is “quality (2)” which starts with accurate intelligence on enemy confronted. It should be obvious, intelligence starts with identifying all threats in future scenarios not just few during opening days of conflict.
As Obama seemingly does not understand principles of social power due to his “activist” experiences being based on his successes at lying. The Islamic State and other Islamic terrorists, have no concept of live and let live peaceful societies. Muslim terrorists being consumed with perpetual hate resulting from what seems like rabid souls subservient to ideology devoted to torturing and killing all doubters; will never be able to peacefully co-exist with those of different belief systems.
What do these observations have to do with Obama’s roadmap to World War III? Simple answer, one does not burn down an entire city just to reduce crime in a “red light district”. Obama and his allies like Holder are not meek in expressing their hatreds and contempt for all things American. Now Americans will have to decide what is more blanking stupid, following an American hater like Obama into war, or following uneducated Marxist-fascist liar like Obama into war? Answer really does not matter, as consequences will be same regardless of Obama’s motives.
Question – If Obama is not lying about Ebola being threat to United States, why is Obama using limited military assets to manage Ebola threats in Africa while U.S. is involved in an unconstitutional war in Middle East to destroy Islamic State? Would comparable example be using limited law enforcement assets during riots in Ferguson, Missouri to manage STD’s in Mexican border town?
Texas Drifter is not suggesting that Ebola does not have potential to be serious health problem in America especially with America’s southern porous border with Mexico. Is Obama too blanked up to know that he is too blanked up to know, that transferring limited military assets from armed forces as war clouds are looming as public relations gesture does not appear to be decision by competent Commander-In-Chief? TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Question - On the positive side, Obama can take pride knowing that some Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas community leaders are more blanked up than Obama. TRUE not FALSE
Clue - How, by claiming that Governor Perry assigned Texas National Guard which has been on America’s Southern porous border less than two months, has ALREADY cost Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas economy estimated five hundred million dollars. Plus, Texas citizens living outside of Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas should reimburse “we the poor perpetual victims and losers of Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texans with half billion tax dollars. (Reference more specifics M.L.T.D. Library Entry # 729)
Perhaps Texas residents not living in Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas might respond with three or four word phrase starting with “Go” and ending with "____"? Just a question, just asking nothing more.
Editor Marshall Note – Due to editing delays, non-fiction short story also known as screenplay concept entitled: “Texas Drifter: Leyenda de Rosa Transparente”. Translation for you only English talkers: “Texas Drifter: Legend Transparent Rose” should be available in days not weeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment