Monday, February 3, 2014

Texas Drifter: Some Pro Lifers Hypocrites?

Library Entry # 629

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Are pro lifers hypocrites, who protest killing of yet unborn who do not protest Obama Care killing: the already born like premature children, sick and elderly? Murdering how, denying services with higher premiums, higher deductibles, larger co-payments, and denying selected services for those with “not viable” futures.

Could partial answer to some pro lifers being hypocrites include pro lifers who trade their responsibilities of ministering to troubled souls for more government legislation and laws?

Definition of hypocrite is one who expresses virtues or qualities one does not have or possess. Example of hypocrites include Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats serving as Unites States Republican Senate and House leaders, their staff, consultants, and allies.

Some have suggested that there are too many cases of killing unborn because there are too many ministers and preachers setting on their getting fatter by day backsides; while counting their congregations tithing’s; as opposed to spending time ministering to those who could benefit from moral teachings to save yet born.

Seems too many self appointed “religious leaders” have forgotten that where the heart goes the body follows; while unmanaged thoughts tend to lead body towards spontaneous lusts.

Then again, ministering to confused or needy might deprive them of time to raise adequate donations; to build idols to show Heaven what an exalted worshipers they have become.

Texas Drifter could use reader’s help in finding passage about the sinner needing to pay commissions to self appointed emissary (insert minister or pastor’s name) acting as “middle man” to receive Salvation offered by Heaven’s Son.

Refresher excerpt notes from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 085 “America’s First Tradition” published 10-16-08.

Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.

Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.

Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."

Translation depending on government legislation to protect not yet born is fool’s path. States Rights like those is Texas may “regulate” behavior; changing moral objectives requires teachings about right and wrong not warnings about what is legal and illegal. If relying on legislation to change personal conduct works so well; guess there have become negligible alcohol related deaths on American highways?

Texas Drifter also needs reader to help me locate passage about passing responsibilities to help truly poor on to government. Seems estimated seventeen trillion dollars to win “war on poverty” is about what represents America’s national debt. Seems there are more perpetual professional poor than when war on poverty began.

With Obama Care on America’s horizon and “war on poverty” and legislation against drunk drivers being so unsuccessful; how many yet born, premature born, already born children, plus sick and elderly will pro lifer hypocrites be sending to their deaths by depending on government policies to replace ministering to confused, scared, tired, truly and other needy?

Another issue involves pro lifer hypocrites supporting porous borders, which allows law breakers called illegal immigrants to enter America; and commit atrocities against American citizens and legal residents. These crimes do not even include diseases and pandemics illegal immigrants are introducing to America’s law abiding population all justified in name of amnesty.

Explaining not complaining, Texas Drifter during one part of my life spent fours years as legally indigent American; which is one hundred eighty degrees different from professional public subsidy addicts also called welfare recipients. One lesson learned that most governments agencies and some churches are little more than pimps for the poor.

Americans like many conservative talks show celebrities who believe America provides great health care for indigents might be surprised when their judgment day personal appointment arrives.

Standard procedure care for most indigents in America is “stabilize, then dismiss so they can go die somewhere else”. Health care for the professional poor is “pad the bill with unnecessary tests and procedures” to allow us to become wealthy on money stolen from taxpayers.

Ironic justice is now most Americans will get to experience indigent health care standards through Obama Care. Translation – “stabilize; dismiss to go die somewhere else”.

Perhaps that is why some pro lifers are not denouncing Obama Care as more deaths means, more money from more bequests and donations from more and more funerals. Now those victimized by Obama Care will include: not yet born, those born premature, to defective to treat children, permanently disabled, those with pre-existing conditions, the severely injured, and the elderly.

Brutal fact of life, Obama Care tolerated by some pro lifers only exists to provide health care to those in good health who do not need health care. TRUE not FALSE

Editor Marshall’s Note: Rare “sneak preview” Texas Drifter’s next writing exercise Library Entry # 630 “America’s Pop Culture Satin’s Sirens”.

No comments:

Post a Comment