Library Entry # 631
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Has a scientific break though now acceptable “legal defense” determined that affluenza rationalizes why those most blessed by material possessions, seem most likely to violate their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend by supporting America last policies?
Background Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Affluenza, a portmanteau of affluence and influenza, is a term used by critics of consumerism.
In December 2013, State District Judge Jean Boyd sentenced a North Texas teenager, Ethan Couch[6][7] to 10 years probation for drunk driving and killing four pedestrians and injuring 11[8] after his attorneys successfully argued that the teen suffered from affluenza and needed rehabilitation, and not prison. The defendant was witnessed on surveillance video stealing beer from a store, driving with seven passengers in his father's Ford F-350, speeding (70 MPH in a 40 MPH zone), and had a blood alcohol content of .24%, three times the legal limit for an adult in Texas, when he was tested 3 hours after the accident. Traces of Valium were also in his system. G. Dick Miller, a psychologist hired as an expert by the defense, testified in court that the teen was a product of affluenza and was unable to link his bad behavior with consequences due to his parents teaching him that wealth buys privilege. The rehabilitation facility near Newport Beach, California that the teen will be attending will cost his family $450,000 annually … (end Wikipedia insert)
Affluenza is not modern concept, consider words by Aristotle:
Since repetition is a good teaching tool, recall Aristotle’s observations: Aristotle’s teachings were that the best states are those “wherein the middle classes are a more formidable part than either the rich or poor” (America's conservatives). Aristotle correctly observed that: an aristocratic state may be beneficial for a time, but aristocrats tend to deteriorate, and become the worst form of government (like corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats).
Aristotle correctly observed two thousand years in advance of America’s internationalist aristocrats: noble character is seldom found among those of noble birth, most who are good for nothing … highly gifted families often degenerate into maniacs.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes (like Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats) the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich (Republican establishment aristocrats) get the better of the poor, or the poor (Progressive Democrats) of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert) - Editor Marshall’s note: ( ) inserts by Editor’ Marshall would have probably been included by Aristotle if Aristotle were still writing?
Could some examples of those infected and affected by affluenza include following?
1. Obama and his Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and their allies, staff, and groupies, including Texas U.S. Progressive Democrat Representative Cuellar and others reader can list.
2. Hollywood celebrities reader can list
3. Socialist devoted millionaire and billionaires like those reader can list.
4. Racist, ethnic, heterophobes, and other haters enjoying financial benefits of affirmative action policies, programs, and laws.
5. Republican Senate and or House Leaders like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner and others reader can list
6. Republican establishment aristocrats like Bush Clan, their consultants, staff, and many others reader can list.
7. Reader can start random lists of all those suffering from affluenza threatening America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, ethical capitalism, middle class attitudes, national security plus other beliefs that made America Heaven’s favorite republic.
Now to brutal truths about how to manage affluenza threats that affect more than just the blanking crazy as referenced in this writing exercise title.
1. Accept President Jackson’s standard “equal opportunity without privilege”.
2. Therapy goal re-establish “middle class attitudes” as better mental health compass than selfish, lust driven, or greed motivated personality characteristics of affluenza symptoms.
3. Confinement in mental health facilities for estimated four hundred fifty thousand dollars a year. Just send bill to Obama Care which should in Americans dreams provide best cheapest health care in all past, present, and future human history.
4. Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.
*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt)
Battered citizen syndrome’s time may arrived since being exposed to too much wealth or too “easy” a life can be medically and legally determined to be a mental illness which rationalizes threatening, injuring, and even killing other inno0cents now called collateral damage. TRUE or FALSE
Then again, perhaps Texas Drifter is just too naïve; as affluenza might be legal defense for Obama and other Marxist-fascists along with corporate fascists like Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats to keep all monies they stole, while plundering America and pillaging Americans during their domestic reins of terror? TRUE maybe – FALSE maybe not – reader can decide right answer.
Clue: Affluenza could not possibly be making Washington D.C.’s political, economic, and social elites that blanking crazy; now could it?
No comments:
Post a Comment