Library Entry # 642
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Title “Talking Trash Patriots Worthless” is fact not question. This writing exercise contains three letters from Colonel Travis under siege at Alamo rarely read by Texans and Americans.
Writing exercise concept “what if” examples.
1. What if those signing Declaration of Independence had not signed the document for fear of angering tyrannical King; much like Republican leaders are too cowardly to challenge self appointed emperor Obama.
2. What if American patriots had left Valley Forge, because it was just too cold to fight for liberty?
3. What if Colonel Travis’s volunteer and regular troops had crossed Travis’s line and left Colonel Travis alone in Alamo?
4. What if General Houston had not burned the “escape” bridge so his troops could cut and run if the battle became too violent?
5. What if brave Americans in every battle during World War II and since then in national security conflicts had decided to walk away rather than fight because they might get wounded or worse?
6. What if Heaven’s Son had said being crucified to offer salvation to sinners seems too violent; and had renounced being Heaven’s Son? How different would your life be now?
7. In Fact how different would your life be now if untold millions of Americans who made sacrifices so you could remain free had just been trash talking patriots?
Following three letters from Colonel Travis are rarely read by many Texans and most Americans. Reader can reference more about Colonel Travis and General Houston at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 641 – Texas Drifter: War of Words Matter.
FIRST LETTER (letters present as written with out grammatical changes)
To Major-General Sam Houston
February 25, 1836
HEADQUARTERS, FORT OF THE ALAMO: Sir; On the 23rd of Feb., the enemy in large force entered the city of Bexar, which could not be prevented, as I had not sufficient force to occupy both positions. Col. Bartes, the Adjutant-Major of the President-General Santa Anna, demanded surrender at discretion, calling us foreign rebels. I answered them with a cannon shot, upon which the enemy commenced a bombardment with a five inch howitzer, which together with a heavy cannonade, has been kept up incessantly ever since. I instantly sent express to Col. Fannin, at Goliad, and to the people of Gonzales and San Felipe. Today at 10 o'clock a.m. some two or three hundred Mexicans crossed the river below and came up under cover of the houses until they arrived within virtual point blank shot, when we opened a heavy discharge of grape and canister on them, together with a well directed fire from small arms which forced them to halt and take shelter in the houses about 90 or 100 yards from our batteries. The action continued to rage about two hours, when the enemy retreated in confusion, dragging many of their dead and wounded.
During the action, the enemy kept up a constant bombardment and discharge of balls, grape, and canister. We know from actual observation that many of the enemy were wounded -- while we, on our part, have not lost a man. Two or three of our men have been slightly scratched by pieces of rock, but have not been disabled.
I take great pleasure in stating that both officers and men conducted themselves with firmness and bravery. Lieutenant Simmons of cavalry acting as infantry, and Captains Carey, Dickinson and Blair of the artillery, rendered essential service, and Charles Despallier and Robert Brown gallantly sallied out and set fire to houses which afforded the enemy shelter, in the face of enemy fire.
Indeed, the whole of the men who were brought into action conducted themselves with such heroism that it would be injustice to discriminate. The Hon. David Crockett was seen at all points, animating the men to do their duty.
Our numbers are few and the enemy still continues to approximate his works to ours. I have every reason to apprehend an attack from his whole force very soon; but I shall hold out to the last extremity, hoping to secure reinforcements in a day or two. Do hasten on aid to me as rapidly as possible, as from the superior number of the enemy, it will be impossible for us to keep them out much longer.
If they overpower us, we fall a sacrifice at the shrine of our country, and we hope prosperity and our country will do our memory justice. Give me help, oh my country! Victory or Death!
W. Barret Travis
Lt. Col. Com
SECOND LETTER
To the President of the Convention
March 3, 1836
COMMANDANCY OF THE ALAMO, BEJAR: In the present confusion of the political authorities of the country, and in the absence of the commander-in-chief, I beg leave to communicate to you the situation of this garrison.
You have doubtless already seen my official report of the action of the 25th ult. made on that day to General Sam Houston, together with the various communications heretofore sent by express. I shall, therefore, confine myself to what has transpired since that date...
I have so fortified this place, that the walls are generally proof against cannon-balls; and I shall continue to entrench on the inside, and strengthen the walls by throwing up dirt. At least two hundred shells have fallen inside our works without having injured a single man; indeed, we have been so fortunate as not to lose a man from any cause, and we have killed many of the enemy. The spirits of my men are still high, although they have had much to depress them.
We have contended for ten days against an enemy whose numbers are variously estimated at from fifteen hundred to six thousand ... A report was circulated that Santa Anna himself was with the enemy, but I think it was false.
A reinforcement of one thousand men is now entering Bexar from the west, and I think it more than probable that Santa Anna is now in town, from the rejoicing we hear.
Col. Fannin is said to be on the march to this place with reinforcements; but I fear it is not true, … I will, however, do the best I can under the circumstances, and I feel confident that the determined valour and desperate courage, heretofore evinced by my men, will not fail them in the last struggle, and although they may be sacrifieced to the vengeance of a Gothic enemy, the victory will cost the enemy so dear, that it will be worse for him than a defeat.
I hope your honorable body will hasten on reinforcements, ammunition, and provisions to our aid, as soon as possible … The power of Santa Anna is to be met here or in the colonies; we had better meet them here, than to suffer a war of desolation to rage our settlements. A blood-red banner waves from the church of Bexar, and in the camp above us, in token that the war is one of vengeance against rebels; they have declared us as such, and demanded that we should surrender at discretion or this garrison should be put to the sword.
Their threats have had no influence on me or my men, but to make all fight with desperation, and that high-souled courage which characterizes the patriot, who is willing to die in defense of his country's liberty and his own honor.
The citizens of this municipality are all our enemies except those who have joined us heretofore; we have but three Mexicans now in the fort; those who have not joined us in this extremity, should be declared public enemies, and their property should aid in paying the expenses of the war.
The bearer of this will give you your honorable body, a statement more in detail, should he escape through the enemy's lines. God and Texas! --
Victory or Death!!
P.S. The enemy's troops are still arriving, and the reinforcements will probably amount to two or three thousand.
THIRD LETTER
To Jesse Grimes
March 3, 1836
Do me the favor to send the enclosed to its proper destination instantly. I am still here, in fine spirits and well to do, with 145 men…
All our couriers have gotten out without being caught and a company of 32 men from Gonzales got in two nights ago, and Colonel Bonham got in today by coming between the powder house and the enemy's upper encampment. … under the flag of independence, we are ready to peril our lives a hundred times a day, and to drive away the monster who is fighting us under a blood-red flag, threatening to murder all prisoners and make Texas a waste desert.
I shall have to fight the enemy on his own terms, yet I am ready to do it, and if my countrymen do not rally to my relief, I am determined to perish in the defense of this place, and my bones shall reproach my country for her neglect…
My respects to all friends, confusion to all enemies. God Bless you.
(End Three Colonel Travis Letters)
Assignment Question: First two steps to saving Heaven’s favorite constitutional ethical capitalist republic are:
1. Know what beliefs are worth defending
2. Know both yours’ and America’s Judases and mortal enemies (reader can list). Judases should include Republican leaders who go along too get along with America’s domestic mortal enemies that reader can list. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Question – General Eisenhower thought people who lived around and did business with Hitler’s death camps were accessories by their silence. Republican leaders and others, who tolerate with their silence possibly millions of deaths from Obama Care, are also accessories to domestic political genocide. TRUE or FALSE
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Texas Drifter: War of Words Matters
Library Entry # 641
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Why war of words matters; may be easier to win war of metaphorical swords if one has already won war of words. New war of words issue is reducing armed defense options for peace through nuclear Armageddon.
Difference between America’s good guys and bad guys: bad guys are fighting their war of words with excrement based propaganda out of mouths of tyrants and domestic war criminals.
Good guys (reader can list) are defending America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights in their war of words with truths for life; liberty known as free will; and private property acquired through ethical capitalism.
Inalienable rights defenses can be expressed by
1. Ten Commandments
2. Act of Abjuration 1581
3. Declaration of Independence
4. U.S. Constitution
5. Bill of Rights
6. Ethical capitalism
7. Other views expressed by defenders of liberties
Bad guys beliefs are motivated by vanity; selfishness; greed; stealing; hate; lust for power over others lives, health, properties, and achievements.
Above good guys might want to remember and celebrate upcoming anniversaries of both defenders at Alamo and at San Jacinto both during spring time 1836.
Texans and other Americans need to remember that Colonel Travis and Colonel Bowie who served “side by side” behind crumbling walls of old church; formed a temporary coalition as they planned a duel to the death after Texas won its Independence. They placed Texas’ future above their personal differences.
Something more Texans and Americans might consider doing for America’s future in contemporary war of words against contemporary tyrants and tyrannies.
Many Texans and fewer Americans are familiar with Colonel Travis’ best known letter from Alamo with following introduction:
Commandancy of the Alamo
Bejar, Feby. 24, 1836
To the People of Texas & All Americans in the World
Fellow citizens & compatriots
I am besieged, by a thousand or more of the Mexicans under Santa Anna I have sustained a continual Bombardment & cannonade for 24 hours & have not lost a man The enemy has demanded a surrender at discretion, otherwise, the garrison are to be put to the sword, if the fort is taken I have answered the demand with a cannon shot, & our flag still waves proudly from the walls I shall never surrender or retreat.
(Reader can reference rest of letter them self except for ending)
P.S. The Lord is on our side. When the enemy appeared in sight we had not three bushels of corn. We have since found in deserted houses 80 or 90 bushels and got into the walls 20 or 30 head of Beeves. Travis
Most bad guys and many good guys ignore fact that Colonel Travis believed “The Lord is on our side”. A belief many contemporary good guys are now to vain to appreciate.
How many Texans and Americans are familiar with last letter to leave the Alamo?
To David Ayers
March 3, 1836
Take care of my little boy. If the country should be saved, I may make for him a splendid fortune; but if the country be lost and I should perish, he will have nothing but the proud recollection that he is the son of a man who died for his country.
Note: The letter to David Ayers is the last known letter written by Travis before the fall of the Alamo on the morning of March 6, 1836. William Barret Travis died at his post on the cannon platform at the northeast corner of the fortress.
How many Texas and Americans know story of Travis’ ring?
In 1835 Travis joined the Texian army as it prepared to battle Mexico for Texas Independence, promising Cummings that as soon as his divorce was final they would marry. As a parting gesture of his affection, he gave her a brooch; and Cummings the cat’s eye ring from her finger and gave it to him. Travis threaded it on a piece of twine and wore it around his neck. He would never see Rebecca again.
Knowing his death was imminent, wrote Betty Smith Meischen in her book “From Jamestown to Texas: A History of Some Early Pioneers of Austin County” [iUniverse 2002], Travis placed the string with the ring around the neck of 15-month-old Angelina Dickinson, one of the non-combatants who survived the siege. Every defender was killed.
It would be nice to think that after such a traumatic beginning, Angelina the “babe of the Alamo” who inherited Travis’ precious ring went on to live a happy life. But this was not the case.
Reader can learn more by referencing Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library –Texas Drifter questions For Some Americans – or All Right Magazine Questions For Some Americans published Dec 9, 2013
Another example of war of w0rds includes General Houston’s example at San Jacinto. Taking a brief step back, definition of motivate is provide person with desire to act.
General Sam Houston had two types of motivations at Battle of San Jacinto. First, cowardly command at Goliad; and second, heart and souls full of courage at Alamo.
When the time was right, General Sam had two messages, one for his troops and one for his enemies. Sam’s first message to his troops: I ordered my scouts to burn all bridges. No one comes in, no one retreats. I must have Santa Anna alive. Remember Goliad. Remember the Alamo.
Casualty reports from April 21st eighteen minute battle sent Houston’s enemies the second message: six hundred enemy killed, two hundred enemy wounded, and 732 enemy captured. Santa Anna was captured the next day after fleeing the battle like a coward.
Out numbered two to one, Republic of Texas casualties were two killed and twenty-three wounded. The wounded included General Sam Houston. When asked about his part in the battle, one Texan answered, I would not have stopped killing those ######## if Jesus Christ himself had asked me too.
Other war of words examples includes Texas Constitution of 1836 which started not ended with Bill of Rights for Texans. Second example involves 1876 Texas Constitution following Yankee Republicans economic and physical genocide against people of South following Civil War in 1860’s.
This writing exercise will not identify Yankee Republican conservative carpetbaggers and scalawags which can be left for another writing exercise.
Third type of players in war of words involves celebrity word marketers whose primary motives are profits through ratings. Recall more often than not timeless truths creates enemies.
Summary war of words:
1. win war of words
2. form coalitions to win
3. develop winning strategy
4. win war of metaphorical swords
5. honor fallen; thank Heaven for blessings; keep faith and keep powder dry; keep one all the time and other as needed
6. almost forgot justice for unwashed and those with middle class attitudes; and no security for guilty
Translation Nuremberg type domestic war crime trials for leaders of evil. Beware not to let revenge create atrocities by cult leaders like Robespierre or 1860’s Yankee Republican conservative carpetbaggers.
War of words should not be about replacing past Marxist-fascist Democrat Party evils with Republican Party evils. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Questions, more like writing assignment, twenty-five words or less: What America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights mean to you; and why they are worth defending.
New issue for war of words: Obama’s Marxist-fascists, along with support of corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats’ policies to reduce size of America’s armed forces to fight one front war while trying to contain second front war; reduces national security options and will probably push America to use nuclear weapons to survive. TRUE or FALSE
Clue: Americans seem to be getting too stupid to survive as free peoples. Truth be known; Obama’s Marxist-fascists and corporate fascist Republicans are promoting nuclear Armageddon. Peace through nuclear war …Peace through nuclear war …
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Why war of words matters; may be easier to win war of metaphorical swords if one has already won war of words. New war of words issue is reducing armed defense options for peace through nuclear Armageddon.
Difference between America’s good guys and bad guys: bad guys are fighting their war of words with excrement based propaganda out of mouths of tyrants and domestic war criminals.
Good guys (reader can list) are defending America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights in their war of words with truths for life; liberty known as free will; and private property acquired through ethical capitalism.
Inalienable rights defenses can be expressed by
1. Ten Commandments
2. Act of Abjuration 1581
3. Declaration of Independence
4. U.S. Constitution
5. Bill of Rights
6. Ethical capitalism
7. Other views expressed by defenders of liberties
Bad guys beliefs are motivated by vanity; selfishness; greed; stealing; hate; lust for power over others lives, health, properties, and achievements.
Above good guys might want to remember and celebrate upcoming anniversaries of both defenders at Alamo and at San Jacinto both during spring time 1836.
Texans and other Americans need to remember that Colonel Travis and Colonel Bowie who served “side by side” behind crumbling walls of old church; formed a temporary coalition as they planned a duel to the death after Texas won its Independence. They placed Texas’ future above their personal differences.
Something more Texans and Americans might consider doing for America’s future in contemporary war of words against contemporary tyrants and tyrannies.
Many Texans and fewer Americans are familiar with Colonel Travis’ best known letter from Alamo with following introduction:
Commandancy of the Alamo
Bejar, Feby. 24, 1836
To the People of Texas & All Americans in the World
Fellow citizens & compatriots
I am besieged, by a thousand or more of the Mexicans under Santa Anna I have sustained a continual Bombardment & cannonade for 24 hours & have not lost a man The enemy has demanded a surrender at discretion, otherwise, the garrison are to be put to the sword, if the fort is taken I have answered the demand with a cannon shot, & our flag still waves proudly from the walls I shall never surrender or retreat.
(Reader can reference rest of letter them self except for ending)
P.S. The Lord is on our side. When the enemy appeared in sight we had not three bushels of corn. We have since found in deserted houses 80 or 90 bushels and got into the walls 20 or 30 head of Beeves. Travis
Most bad guys and many good guys ignore fact that Colonel Travis believed “The Lord is on our side”. A belief many contemporary good guys are now to vain to appreciate.
How many Texans and Americans are familiar with last letter to leave the Alamo?
To David Ayers
March 3, 1836
Take care of my little boy. If the country should be saved, I may make for him a splendid fortune; but if the country be lost and I should perish, he will have nothing but the proud recollection that he is the son of a man who died for his country.
Note: The letter to David Ayers is the last known letter written by Travis before the fall of the Alamo on the morning of March 6, 1836. William Barret Travis died at his post on the cannon platform at the northeast corner of the fortress.
How many Texas and Americans know story of Travis’ ring?
In 1835 Travis joined the Texian army as it prepared to battle Mexico for Texas Independence, promising Cummings that as soon as his divorce was final they would marry. As a parting gesture of his affection, he gave her a brooch; and Cummings the cat’s eye ring from her finger and gave it to him. Travis threaded it on a piece of twine and wore it around his neck. He would never see Rebecca again.
Knowing his death was imminent, wrote Betty Smith Meischen in her book “From Jamestown to Texas: A History of Some Early Pioneers of Austin County” [iUniverse 2002], Travis placed the string with the ring around the neck of 15-month-old Angelina Dickinson, one of the non-combatants who survived the siege. Every defender was killed.
It would be nice to think that after such a traumatic beginning, Angelina the “babe of the Alamo” who inherited Travis’ precious ring went on to live a happy life. But this was not the case.
Reader can learn more by referencing Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library –Texas Drifter questions For Some Americans – or All Right Magazine Questions For Some Americans published Dec 9, 2013
Another example of war of w0rds includes General Houston’s example at San Jacinto. Taking a brief step back, definition of motivate is provide person with desire to act.
General Sam Houston had two types of motivations at Battle of San Jacinto. First, cowardly command at Goliad; and second, heart and souls full of courage at Alamo.
When the time was right, General Sam had two messages, one for his troops and one for his enemies. Sam’s first message to his troops: I ordered my scouts to burn all bridges. No one comes in, no one retreats. I must have Santa Anna alive. Remember Goliad. Remember the Alamo.
Casualty reports from April 21st eighteen minute battle sent Houston’s enemies the second message: six hundred enemy killed, two hundred enemy wounded, and 732 enemy captured. Santa Anna was captured the next day after fleeing the battle like a coward.
Out numbered two to one, Republic of Texas casualties were two killed and twenty-three wounded. The wounded included General Sam Houston. When asked about his part in the battle, one Texan answered, I would not have stopped killing those ######## if Jesus Christ himself had asked me too.
Other war of words examples includes Texas Constitution of 1836 which started not ended with Bill of Rights for Texans. Second example involves 1876 Texas Constitution following Yankee Republicans economic and physical genocide against people of South following Civil War in 1860’s.
This writing exercise will not identify Yankee Republican conservative carpetbaggers and scalawags which can be left for another writing exercise.
Third type of players in war of words involves celebrity word marketers whose primary motives are profits through ratings. Recall more often than not timeless truths creates enemies.
Summary war of words:
1. win war of words
2. form coalitions to win
3. develop winning strategy
4. win war of metaphorical swords
5. honor fallen; thank Heaven for blessings; keep faith and keep powder dry; keep one all the time and other as needed
6. almost forgot justice for unwashed and those with middle class attitudes; and no security for guilty
Translation Nuremberg type domestic war crime trials for leaders of evil. Beware not to let revenge create atrocities by cult leaders like Robespierre or 1860’s Yankee Republican conservative carpetbaggers.
War of words should not be about replacing past Marxist-fascist Democrat Party evils with Republican Party evils. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Questions, more like writing assignment, twenty-five words or less: What America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights mean to you; and why they are worth defending.
New issue for war of words: Obama’s Marxist-fascists, along with support of corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats’ policies to reduce size of America’s armed forces to fight one front war while trying to contain second front war; reduces national security options and will probably push America to use nuclear weapons to survive. TRUE or FALSE
Clue: Americans seem to be getting too stupid to survive as free peoples. Truth be known; Obama’s Marxist-fascists and corporate fascist Republicans are promoting nuclear Armageddon. Peace through nuclear war …Peace through nuclear war …
Monday, February 24, 2014
Texas Drifter: What Some Parents Teach Children
Library Entry # 640
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question can parents teach their children to be mean or like being a victim?
Players:
1. Client (C)
2. Investigator (I)
Client (blurts out): Kids learn from somewhere – You are an investigator – Find out where:
1. My daughter learned to tolerate being domestic abuse victim, and
2. My son learned to abuse women and children.
Investigator: Not a social worker, counselor, or therapist
Client: You’re an investigator – investigate – find out where my kids learned to like being a victim and abusing others. I demand justice from those who messed up my kids. Job pays fifty thousand cash plus expenses. When can you start?
Investigator: Have to think about when – used to getting paid to find out who is too blanked up to know they are blanked up; not why some one is too blanked up to know they are blanked up.
Investigator Continues: Want all cash up front – just in case you do not like final report. Plus want unlimited access to all you and your families’ social and business contacts. My terms are not negotiable.
Client: Done – You will have your cash within two hours.
Investigator – Good will be in touch when I have your final report.
(Seventeen days later Investigator schedules meeting to deliver report to Client)
Investigator: Two parts of report based on following principles:
Part I - Parental Character Traits Based on Conduct not Lectures
1. Shows no respect for others (hate speech)
2. Envies others’ property, possessions, achievements (greed – example borrows others’ property returns property broken or damaged and never “makes right”)
3. Breaks promises (always lies when telling truth is easier)
4. Constantly looking for opportunity to cheat (steals known as thief)
Part II – Symptoms of above Parental Character Traits
1. Starts hurting others for their “own good”
2. Become routinely sadistic because they “can”
3. Become vainer as they get older because they thrive on lust for power to hurt
4. Profile list: sadistic; hater; greedy; liar; thief
(Investigator hands Client folder)
Investigator: Here is your “Report Summary” with person you are demanding justice from.
(Client opens folder to see eight inch by ten inch mirror)
(Client screams “What is this” and throws mirror against wall)
Investigator (calmly states): That should get you seven years bad luck.
Investigator Continues: Children have two learning options. First learn to be like their parents. Second learn not to be like their parents. Since you “protected” your children by not letting them be around others. Conclusion both your daughter and son learned to like pain and be mean like you.
Client: What about my wife she should share some of your blame
Investigator: Your children watched you drive their loving mother to suicide; and chose to become mean survivor like you no matter pain inflicted or pain received. Trouble with truth based on valid observations also known as facts; truth can never be changed with denials; lies; or propaganda.
Client: That’s it?
Investigator: You can smash every mirror in the world; and still not change spiritual fact that judgment day is personal. Old timers say advice is worth what you pay for it. Following is free security advice.
Investigator continues: Just guessing your daughter and son have probably already picked out cheapest nursing home on planet earth for your final years. A nursing home, I might add, they will never visit or will any one else you know.
Investigator adds: From Hades on earth to Hades in eternity; gives new meaning to justice for sins of parent like you. Case closed
Moving on to assignment review questions: Being a mean parent who teaches their children to be mean or like being hurt is not illegal or a crime unless Obama issues another executive order. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question: human condition evolves from falling in love; staying in love; falling out of love; to tolerating or just not caring one way or the other. Then there are “those” like above client who hurts others for pleasure.
Above reference to “those” are truly mean ones among us in U.S. Reader knows “those” like Obama his political allies, including Obama’s Republican leaders in both U.S. Senate and U.S. House are all “those” that keep law enforcement, private security, and investigators in business. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: One reader asks me how Texas Drifter creates his “bonus questions”. Texas Drifter reported that idea for last bonus question came while he was engaged in surveillance of one hundred seventy-five to two hundred Black Vultures (incorrectly called buzzards).
Why, since there was no water near; and it seemed too early for their roosting; narrows options to feeding. When that many Black Vultures are “dining” in ranch scout’s territory, answers to what they are feasting on are part of job.
That many migrating Black Vultures represent “eating machine” capable of consuming thousand plus pounds of carrion a day. Fact, not even Texas jack rabbits are that big in Texas. Now reader knows what Texas Drifter was doing when he came up with idea for above “bonus question”.
Editor Marshall’s Second Note: Texas Drifter acknowledges that various Attention Deficit Disorder diagnosis’s and accompanying prescription drugs (many just motivated for profits) for children mostly from single parent families involves origins of violence issues for another writing exercise.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question can parents teach their children to be mean or like being a victim?
Players:
1. Client (C)
2. Investigator (I)
Client (blurts out): Kids learn from somewhere – You are an investigator – Find out where:
1. My daughter learned to tolerate being domestic abuse victim, and
2. My son learned to abuse women and children.
Investigator: Not a social worker, counselor, or therapist
Client: You’re an investigator – investigate – find out where my kids learned to like being a victim and abusing others. I demand justice from those who messed up my kids. Job pays fifty thousand cash plus expenses. When can you start?
Investigator: Have to think about when – used to getting paid to find out who is too blanked up to know they are blanked up; not why some one is too blanked up to know they are blanked up.
Investigator Continues: Want all cash up front – just in case you do not like final report. Plus want unlimited access to all you and your families’ social and business contacts. My terms are not negotiable.
Client: Done – You will have your cash within two hours.
Investigator – Good will be in touch when I have your final report.
(Seventeen days later Investigator schedules meeting to deliver report to Client)
Investigator: Two parts of report based on following principles:
Part I - Parental Character Traits Based on Conduct not Lectures
1. Shows no respect for others (hate speech)
2. Envies others’ property, possessions, achievements (greed – example borrows others’ property returns property broken or damaged and never “makes right”)
3. Breaks promises (always lies when telling truth is easier)
4. Constantly looking for opportunity to cheat (steals known as thief)
Part II – Symptoms of above Parental Character Traits
1. Starts hurting others for their “own good”
2. Become routinely sadistic because they “can”
3. Become vainer as they get older because they thrive on lust for power to hurt
4. Profile list: sadistic; hater; greedy; liar; thief
(Investigator hands Client folder)
Investigator: Here is your “Report Summary” with person you are demanding justice from.
(Client opens folder to see eight inch by ten inch mirror)
(Client screams “What is this” and throws mirror against wall)
Investigator (calmly states): That should get you seven years bad luck.
Investigator Continues: Children have two learning options. First learn to be like their parents. Second learn not to be like their parents. Since you “protected” your children by not letting them be around others. Conclusion both your daughter and son learned to like pain and be mean like you.
Client: What about my wife she should share some of your blame
Investigator: Your children watched you drive their loving mother to suicide; and chose to become mean survivor like you no matter pain inflicted or pain received. Trouble with truth based on valid observations also known as facts; truth can never be changed with denials; lies; or propaganda.
Client: That’s it?
Investigator: You can smash every mirror in the world; and still not change spiritual fact that judgment day is personal. Old timers say advice is worth what you pay for it. Following is free security advice.
Investigator continues: Just guessing your daughter and son have probably already picked out cheapest nursing home on planet earth for your final years. A nursing home, I might add, they will never visit or will any one else you know.
Investigator adds: From Hades on earth to Hades in eternity; gives new meaning to justice for sins of parent like you. Case closed
Moving on to assignment review questions: Being a mean parent who teaches their children to be mean or like being hurt is not illegal or a crime unless Obama issues another executive order. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question: human condition evolves from falling in love; staying in love; falling out of love; to tolerating or just not caring one way or the other. Then there are “those” like above client who hurts others for pleasure.
Above reference to “those” are truly mean ones among us in U.S. Reader knows “those” like Obama his political allies, including Obama’s Republican leaders in both U.S. Senate and U.S. House are all “those” that keep law enforcement, private security, and investigators in business. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: One reader asks me how Texas Drifter creates his “bonus questions”. Texas Drifter reported that idea for last bonus question came while he was engaged in surveillance of one hundred seventy-five to two hundred Black Vultures (incorrectly called buzzards).
Why, since there was no water near; and it seemed too early for their roosting; narrows options to feeding. When that many Black Vultures are “dining” in ranch scout’s territory, answers to what they are feasting on are part of job.
That many migrating Black Vultures represent “eating machine” capable of consuming thousand plus pounds of carrion a day. Fact, not even Texas jack rabbits are that big in Texas. Now reader knows what Texas Drifter was doing when he came up with idea for above “bonus question”.
Editor Marshall’s Second Note: Texas Drifter acknowledges that various Attention Deficit Disorder diagnosis’s and accompanying prescription drugs (many just motivated for profits) for children mostly from single parent families involves origins of violence issues for another writing exercise.
Friday, February 21, 2014
Texas Drifter: Writing Tips For Tea Party
Library Entry # 639
Marshall's Law Dateline - Some writing tips for Tea Party Members.
(Reader might consider sharing following with conservatives and other patriots.)
Heard it said that you are an individual that appreciates right word at right time concept.
You may or may not be interested in considering using “visual prose” as writing warm up exercise for your written or spoken words projects like public speeches.
Working definition of “visual prose” according to Editor Marshall: Texas Drifter uses “visual prose” (process of using few words as possible to inform and entertain) as warm up writing exercises. Example, consider following warm up exercise for Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 636 “Obama Planning On Third Term?” or All Right Magazine Texas Drifter: Obama Planning on Third Term? Published February 18, 2014
You might test your writing skills by taking: All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test. You can reference directions below.
References:
1. All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test - Published February 18, 2014. - Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continuously re-arranging serious words can become boring. Reader can test their painting with words like artists use colors skills. How by inserting title plus finishing last half of following visual prose without music writing exercise.
2. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry 638 – Texas Drifter: Some Sensitivity Training Torture? Published February 20, 2014 – sample visual prose writing warm up exercise preceding writing exercise project.
3. All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter Right to Write - Published Nov 9, 2011 – Texas Drifter has the inalienable right to write what he writes. Learn how you can be better writer.
Old adage still seems true advice is what you pay for it.
Closing thought, conservatives and other patriots should win “war of words” against Obama’s Marxist-fascists, and Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats. Why you ask, bad guys are just spewing forth excrement based propaganda to appeal to selfish, lazy, and America last crowd. Compared to conservatives and other patriots documenting timeless truths with words reflecting heart felt emotions.
Your time and interest are appreciated;
(Sign you name)
Marshall's Law Dateline - Some writing tips for Tea Party Members.
(Reader might consider sharing following with conservatives and other patriots.)
Heard it said that you are an individual that appreciates right word at right time concept.
You may or may not be interested in considering using “visual prose” as writing warm up exercise for your written or spoken words projects like public speeches.
Working definition of “visual prose” according to Editor Marshall: Texas Drifter uses “visual prose” (process of using few words as possible to inform and entertain) as warm up writing exercises. Example, consider following warm up exercise for Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 636 “Obama Planning On Third Term?” or All Right Magazine Texas Drifter: Obama Planning on Third Term? Published February 18, 2014
You might test your writing skills by taking: All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test. You can reference directions below.
References:
1. All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test - Published February 18, 2014. - Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continuously re-arranging serious words can become boring. Reader can test their painting with words like artists use colors skills. How by inserting title plus finishing last half of following visual prose without music writing exercise.
2. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry 638 – Texas Drifter: Some Sensitivity Training Torture? Published February 20, 2014 – sample visual prose writing warm up exercise preceding writing exercise project.
3. All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter Right to Write - Published Nov 9, 2011 – Texas Drifter has the inalienable right to write what he writes. Learn how you can be better writer.
Old adage still seems true advice is what you pay for it.
Closing thought, conservatives and other patriots should win “war of words” against Obama’s Marxist-fascists, and Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats. Why you ask, bad guys are just spewing forth excrement based propaganda to appeal to selfish, lazy, and America last crowd. Compared to conservatives and other patriots documenting timeless truths with words reflecting heart felt emotions.
Your time and interest are appreciated;
(Sign you name)
Thursday, February 20, 2014
Texas Drifter: Some Sensitivity Training Torture?
Library Entry # 638
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed.
One definition of sensitivity is being sympathetic to bad peoples’ emotional problems.
Visual prose warm up writing exercise:
Heaven in mercy business
Funerals for the living
Hatred wasted emotion
Self defense necessary action
Unwashed deserve justice
No security for guilty
Opportunity without privilege
Due process for cheaters
Definition of cheater is one who breaks rules for special privileges.
Example of better known cheaters include:
1. Marxist-fascists
2. corporate fascists
3. oath breakers
4. illegal immigrants
5. some public sector unions
6. public subsidy addicts not truly indigent
7. Haters like minorities hating others for race, ethnic heritage, reader knows list
8. frauds like environmentalists and pretenders like Republican Senate and House leaders
9. internationalists who place America’s financial interest on equal basis among other nations, who also rely on Federal Reserve to serve corporate fascists at expense of America’s national financial interests
10. cult leaders masquerading as false prophets for conservatives or worse
Circling back to this writing exercise concept: Some Sensitivity Training Torture?
Using lethal force in self defense situations is in reality combat scenario whether it is for personal protection; “protect castle doctrine”; general security for others; major wars; or other situations.
Political correct sensitivity seems about making survivor of self defense scenario feel guilty about having to do what “had to be done”. How, by making survivor feel attacker was true victim. Was David supposed to feel bad about slaying Goliath because Goliath was over sized child from a broken home?
How much sympathy do people trying to kill you, your, family, neighbors or other law abiders deserve? None objective in combat scenarios is to manage threat as quickly and efficiently as possible. Why, to manage follow up threat if one occurs.
Some examples of when managing threat might seem necessary:
1. methamphetamine addict attacks you with ax
2. illegal immigrants throwing rocks which are lethal projectiles at Border Patrol agents
3. arsonist is trying to start fie to burn down nursing home full of elderly invalids
4. terrorists in process of setting up I.E.D.
5. enemy combatants shooting at American military personnel
6. child running towards client with grenade in flower basket
7. spy in route to deliver battle changing intelligence to enemy
8. racist teen trying to use his fists to beat another person to death
9. could continue, perhaps reader would like to add their own examples to list?
Restating obvious, not every life threatening scenario requires lethal force. Sometime scenario avoidance; not being in scenario; sometimes retreat works; other times display of force might be appropriate.
Warning shots are for movies not real life, as warning shots can defender killed.
Further discussion can include in another writing exercise about steps from recognizing threat to responding which are fractions of seconds’ non-reversible decisions.
Translation once line has been crossed and lethal force is final option; goal should be to instill physical and mental reflexes to survive self defense scenario. Primary teaching should also include how to live with final decision by not making survivor feel guilty with political correct sensitivity counseling.
Living with reality and accepting consequences of actions necessary to survive; plus real world memories will be tough enough, without desk pilot feel good social worker type counselors trying to spike their speaking fees.
Spectators, liberal columnists and reporters will always be “outsiders looking in”. Reader might consider decades and decades ago Texas Drifter undercover-surveillance assignment.
Assignment involved being pulled off another case for low profile surveillance of recent rape scene in case bad guy returned for more victims.
Surprisingly first and thus far only rape victim was standing near same dark alley where her assault had occurred just two nights earlier.
When discretely asked as this “passer by” if she felt safe? Her response, “Look at me. No one desires me because of my looks; bad social life is better than no social life.”
Reported incident to supervisor, who stated: We are short on resources as it is; go back to original assignment target area.”
Feel good liberals will probably never understand supervisor’s orders, but then again liberals live in fantasy politically correct worlds; not world with choices being made with limited options. TRUE or FALSE
Recall Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: Above or following is not intended as legal or anything else good disclaimers’ are required to include; just subject matter for passing thoughts.
Texas Drifter was and may still be certified in Texas to teach in private sector: “Spy As A Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance”. TRUE or FALSE
Question, reader’s guesstimate politically correct sensitivity counseling benefits attacker more than survivor of self defense scenarios. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Questions– Texas Republican ruling elite establishment aristocrats also known as Obama’s Republicans are “warning” conservatives in Texas elections not to speak poorly of illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE
Why, solely because Obama’s Texas Republicans are not having their friends and loved ones murdered; raped; kidnapped; robbed; killed and maimed in DUI accidents by illegal immigrants as are rest of law abiding residents of Texas. Illegal immigrants represent estimated ten percent of population in Texas and commit more than thirty percent of crimes in Texas. TRUE or FALSE
Cornyn and rest of Obama’s Texas Republicans can best be remembered by their motto: Be nice to illegals even when they destroy your working class families; because “us rich folks” like them working for less money than we used to pay you unwashed conservatives and other patriots. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed.
One definition of sensitivity is being sympathetic to bad peoples’ emotional problems.
Visual prose warm up writing exercise:
Heaven in mercy business
Funerals for the living
Hatred wasted emotion
Self defense necessary action
Unwashed deserve justice
No security for guilty
Opportunity without privilege
Due process for cheaters
Definition of cheater is one who breaks rules for special privileges.
Example of better known cheaters include:
1. Marxist-fascists
2. corporate fascists
3. oath breakers
4. illegal immigrants
5. some public sector unions
6. public subsidy addicts not truly indigent
7. Haters like minorities hating others for race, ethnic heritage, reader knows list
8. frauds like environmentalists and pretenders like Republican Senate and House leaders
9. internationalists who place America’s financial interest on equal basis among other nations, who also rely on Federal Reserve to serve corporate fascists at expense of America’s national financial interests
10. cult leaders masquerading as false prophets for conservatives or worse
Circling back to this writing exercise concept: Some Sensitivity Training Torture?
Using lethal force in self defense situations is in reality combat scenario whether it is for personal protection; “protect castle doctrine”; general security for others; major wars; or other situations.
Political correct sensitivity seems about making survivor of self defense scenario feel guilty about having to do what “had to be done”. How, by making survivor feel attacker was true victim. Was David supposed to feel bad about slaying Goliath because Goliath was over sized child from a broken home?
How much sympathy do people trying to kill you, your, family, neighbors or other law abiders deserve? None objective in combat scenarios is to manage threat as quickly and efficiently as possible. Why, to manage follow up threat if one occurs.
Some examples of when managing threat might seem necessary:
1. methamphetamine addict attacks you with ax
2. illegal immigrants throwing rocks which are lethal projectiles at Border Patrol agents
3. arsonist is trying to start fie to burn down nursing home full of elderly invalids
4. terrorists in process of setting up I.E.D.
5. enemy combatants shooting at American military personnel
6. child running towards client with grenade in flower basket
7. spy in route to deliver battle changing intelligence to enemy
8. racist teen trying to use his fists to beat another person to death
9. could continue, perhaps reader would like to add their own examples to list?
Restating obvious, not every life threatening scenario requires lethal force. Sometime scenario avoidance; not being in scenario; sometimes retreat works; other times display of force might be appropriate.
Warning shots are for movies not real life, as warning shots can defender killed.
Further discussion can include in another writing exercise about steps from recognizing threat to responding which are fractions of seconds’ non-reversible decisions.
Translation once line has been crossed and lethal force is final option; goal should be to instill physical and mental reflexes to survive self defense scenario. Primary teaching should also include how to live with final decision by not making survivor feel guilty with political correct sensitivity counseling.
Living with reality and accepting consequences of actions necessary to survive; plus real world memories will be tough enough, without desk pilot feel good social worker type counselors trying to spike their speaking fees.
Spectators, liberal columnists and reporters will always be “outsiders looking in”. Reader might consider decades and decades ago Texas Drifter undercover-surveillance assignment.
Assignment involved being pulled off another case for low profile surveillance of recent rape scene in case bad guy returned for more victims.
Surprisingly first and thus far only rape victim was standing near same dark alley where her assault had occurred just two nights earlier.
When discretely asked as this “passer by” if she felt safe? Her response, “Look at me. No one desires me because of my looks; bad social life is better than no social life.”
Reported incident to supervisor, who stated: We are short on resources as it is; go back to original assignment target area.”
Feel good liberals will probably never understand supervisor’s orders, but then again liberals live in fantasy politically correct worlds; not world with choices being made with limited options. TRUE or FALSE
Recall Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: Above or following is not intended as legal or anything else good disclaimers’ are required to include; just subject matter for passing thoughts.
Texas Drifter was and may still be certified in Texas to teach in private sector: “Spy As A Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance”. TRUE or FALSE
Question, reader’s guesstimate politically correct sensitivity counseling benefits attacker more than survivor of self defense scenarios. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Questions– Texas Republican ruling elite establishment aristocrats also known as Obama’s Republicans are “warning” conservatives in Texas elections not to speak poorly of illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE
Why, solely because Obama’s Texas Republicans are not having their friends and loved ones murdered; raped; kidnapped; robbed; killed and maimed in DUI accidents by illegal immigrants as are rest of law abiding residents of Texas. Illegal immigrants represent estimated ten percent of population in Texas and commit more than thirty percent of crimes in Texas. TRUE or FALSE
Cornyn and rest of Obama’s Texas Republicans can best be remembered by their motto: Be nice to illegals even when they destroy your working class families; because “us rich folks” like them working for less money than we used to pay you unwashed conservatives and other patriots. TRUE or FALSE
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Texas Drifter: Explain Differences Between?
Library Entry # 637
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Explain differences between Obama Care bureaucrats administratively murdering millions of Americans; and what federal government did to dozens of people at Waco.
Obvious answer Obama Care murdered millions of Americans not dozens like at Waco. Extended answer, murders by federal government at Waco were more humane as victims died “quicker”; as opposed to months and months of suffering before death by Obama Care.
Side note Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats are accessories to Obama Care murders with their tolerate Obama care genocide until Americas tire are seeing their loved ones being administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats.
Explain differences between Obama’s role in murdering “grandmother” to your grandchildren; and Republican leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner plus others reader can list, in same Obama Care murder of same loved one to your grandchildren.
Writing theme for this writing exercise is one never gets too old to learn. Three examples provided in my younger years of how to never quit learning.
1. Old man told me he only read one page from Holy Bible and one page from dictionary every day. Texas Drifter is still fortunate enough to possess that old man’s dictionary.
2. Another old man told me that he never met a person that could not teach him at least one thing either good or bad.
3. Old field instructor taught me that good investigators are made by knowing how and when to ask right questions.
Explaining differences between spiritual religions and secular religions starts with referencing Marshall’s law Texas Drifter Library – Library Entry # 633 “Texas Drifter: Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms” – February 2014
Unaddressed issue was: is not toleration a two way street? Seems that asking for respect when the one asking for respect has no intention of returning respect is offering fool’s plan?
Circling back to title theme: “Explain Distinctions Between”: Reader is asked to explain to Texas Drifter what is difference between protecting all your family and protecting only some of your family; to protecting all America’s traditions, values, principles and only protecting few of America’s traditions, values, and principles?
Translation, your house is on fire and you decide to only save some of your family members like your wife and some of your children; but not your wife’s mother and the rest of your children.
Compare translation to America is self destructing from increasing national debt; less inalienable rights for majority members; national security is being decimated by porous borders with continuing invasion by twenty million plus illegal immigrants, plus smaller and smaller defense budgets.
Reader decides to only defend some of America’s traditions, values, and principles like part of First Amendment and Second Amendment; but none of U.S. Constitution’s mandates defining Executive Branch’s limited powers, or provisions of Ninth or Tenth Amendments.
Explain distinctions between choosing to save only some of your family members from the fire; and defending a few of your inalienable rights being vanquished by Obama and Obama’s Republicans like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, and others reader can list.
Texas Drifter would also appreciate it, if you explained to me how you choose which family members and which inalienable rights to save.
Before explaining your compromising answer, recall following compromise measurements: Compromise half of your principles today; half tomorrow; half next day; half following day; half day after; by the time one reaches end of week, one has no more principles to compromise. Reader doubts this Texas Drifter observation reader can run their own numbers for compromising half your principles a day during seven day week.
Seems final destiny of political correctness and affirmative action can be previewed with Obama Care, and eventual predictions of Stalin like re-education camps and Hitler’s not worth re-education camps. TRUE or FALSE
Explain differences between: deciding when too many citizens, neighbors, friends, and loved ones have been administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats; or have been transported to have attitude transformations at Obama re-education camps?
One similarity will be that Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list will no doubt tolerate Obama’s domestic political crimes until voters have had enough abuse from Obama tolerated by Obama’s Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
Following scenario could be future American history with Obama’s crimes being tolerated by Republican Senate and House leaders. TRUE or FALSE
“Last Letter”
Act I
Ranch Owner: Drifter, postmaster gave me a letter he said might be for one of my workers. Envelope is addressed to Richard Blake (hands letter to Texas Drifter).
Drifter: (takes letter and quips) Thanks.
Rancher Owner: Did not know your name was Richard Blake.
Drifter: Did not say it was. (Dog growls at Ranch Owner as Drifter turns to walk away.)
Ranch Owner: Never did like that dog; Drifter, know why I keep you around?
Drifter (stops and turns half way around): Then things are even, Dog never liked you either. Why you keep me around, good work for ten dollars a day; plus food, shelter, and expenses.
Ranch Owner: That too, mostly cause trespassing, vandalism to, stealing from, and poaching on this ranch has completely stopped since you signed on as security scout.
Texas Drifter: If I told you how I do my job, you would cut my meager wages, or run me and Dog off. I half way like working here; so do not change that by bringing me any more mail.
Ranch Owner: Go read your mail; that is last letter I will ever bring you.
Texas Drifter: Sounds fair enough, here is a list of some supplies Dog and I need.
Sundown next day: Drifter sets pot of coffee and metal bowl full of beer on small camp fire, and opens letter.
Dearest Friend,
Just a few words to dispel your anxieties about man made natural disaster camps; there are probably forty thousand to fifty thousand citizens here. Camp is fenced in to protect us from outsiders wanting in to escape worsening conditions in this part of America. We are truly lucky ones despite less than perfect conditions. We at least have security, and solace knowing our federal government is doing everything it can to provide for us.
Sanitary conditions are an open ditch. Food is served once a day and consists of liquid powdered milk over uncooked rice. Obama Care is limited to barbiturates. Healthy camp residents are engaged in constructing red brick buildings to be used as showers. Rumors abound that our Emperor, will visit to dedicate new showers we are all looking forward to enjoying.
I bribed one of guards with my wedding rings to mail you this letter to let you know even though times may be hard, government is doing everything it can to help us rebuild ours’ and America’s future.
(Texas Drifter crumbles letter and envelope and gently drops into camp fire.)
Texas Drifter whispers: You know Dog, tears still never change anything.
(Picks up coffee pot and asks Dog): Want some coffee in your beer?
Dog (smiles by bearing teeth with soft growl):
Drifter: Just asking, I finish my coffee; you finish your beer; be time to go earn our meager wages.
End “Last Letter”
Closing thought, Bill Rights First Amendment is specific: “government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion …” for either spiritual or secular religions.
Secular religions are:
1. Marxist-fascists lust for power for greed
2. corporate fascists lust for power for greed
3. environmentalism lust for power for pseudo science
4. hatreds by heterophobes seeking societal “happy face” endorsements
5. minorities racial /ethnic hatreds of majorities
6. Islamic terrorists lust for sadistic power
Explain differences between those with spiritual based religions who respect First Amendment; and those with secular based religions who have total contempt for anything Constitution; most vocal secular based religious followers also have no problem persecuting and destroying - reader should already know list: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and other American patriots reader can list.
First negotiating point between spiritual religions and secular religions is that mutual respect must be verifiable. Second point is secular religions are not entitled to privilege of having government respect establishment of their secular religious beliefs. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Explain differences between Obama Care bureaucrats administratively murdering millions of Americans; and what federal government did to dozens of people at Waco.
Obvious answer Obama Care murdered millions of Americans not dozens like at Waco. Extended answer, murders by federal government at Waco were more humane as victims died “quicker”; as opposed to months and months of suffering before death by Obama Care.
Side note Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats are accessories to Obama Care murders with their tolerate Obama care genocide until Americas tire are seeing their loved ones being administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats.
Explain differences between Obama’s role in murdering “grandmother” to your grandchildren; and Republican leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner plus others reader can list, in same Obama Care murder of same loved one to your grandchildren.
Writing theme for this writing exercise is one never gets too old to learn. Three examples provided in my younger years of how to never quit learning.
1. Old man told me he only read one page from Holy Bible and one page from dictionary every day. Texas Drifter is still fortunate enough to possess that old man’s dictionary.
2. Another old man told me that he never met a person that could not teach him at least one thing either good or bad.
3. Old field instructor taught me that good investigators are made by knowing how and when to ask right questions.
Explaining differences between spiritual religions and secular religions starts with referencing Marshall’s law Texas Drifter Library – Library Entry # 633 “Texas Drifter: Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms” – February 2014
Unaddressed issue was: is not toleration a two way street? Seems that asking for respect when the one asking for respect has no intention of returning respect is offering fool’s plan?
Circling back to title theme: “Explain Distinctions Between”: Reader is asked to explain to Texas Drifter what is difference between protecting all your family and protecting only some of your family; to protecting all America’s traditions, values, principles and only protecting few of America’s traditions, values, and principles?
Translation, your house is on fire and you decide to only save some of your family members like your wife and some of your children; but not your wife’s mother and the rest of your children.
Compare translation to America is self destructing from increasing national debt; less inalienable rights for majority members; national security is being decimated by porous borders with continuing invasion by twenty million plus illegal immigrants, plus smaller and smaller defense budgets.
Reader decides to only defend some of America’s traditions, values, and principles like part of First Amendment and Second Amendment; but none of U.S. Constitution’s mandates defining Executive Branch’s limited powers, or provisions of Ninth or Tenth Amendments.
Explain distinctions between choosing to save only some of your family members from the fire; and defending a few of your inalienable rights being vanquished by Obama and Obama’s Republicans like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, and others reader can list.
Texas Drifter would also appreciate it, if you explained to me how you choose which family members and which inalienable rights to save.
Before explaining your compromising answer, recall following compromise measurements: Compromise half of your principles today; half tomorrow; half next day; half following day; half day after; by the time one reaches end of week, one has no more principles to compromise. Reader doubts this Texas Drifter observation reader can run their own numbers for compromising half your principles a day during seven day week.
Seems final destiny of political correctness and affirmative action can be previewed with Obama Care, and eventual predictions of Stalin like re-education camps and Hitler’s not worth re-education camps. TRUE or FALSE
Explain differences between: deciding when too many citizens, neighbors, friends, and loved ones have been administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats; or have been transported to have attitude transformations at Obama re-education camps?
One similarity will be that Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list will no doubt tolerate Obama’s domestic political crimes until voters have had enough abuse from Obama tolerated by Obama’s Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
Following scenario could be future American history with Obama’s crimes being tolerated by Republican Senate and House leaders. TRUE or FALSE
“Last Letter”
Act I
Ranch Owner: Drifter, postmaster gave me a letter he said might be for one of my workers. Envelope is addressed to Richard Blake (hands letter to Texas Drifter).
Drifter: (takes letter and quips) Thanks.
Rancher Owner: Did not know your name was Richard Blake.
Drifter: Did not say it was. (Dog growls at Ranch Owner as Drifter turns to walk away.)
Ranch Owner: Never did like that dog; Drifter, know why I keep you around?
Drifter (stops and turns half way around): Then things are even, Dog never liked you either. Why you keep me around, good work for ten dollars a day; plus food, shelter, and expenses.
Ranch Owner: That too, mostly cause trespassing, vandalism to, stealing from, and poaching on this ranch has completely stopped since you signed on as security scout.
Texas Drifter: If I told you how I do my job, you would cut my meager wages, or run me and Dog off. I half way like working here; so do not change that by bringing me any more mail.
Ranch Owner: Go read your mail; that is last letter I will ever bring you.
Texas Drifter: Sounds fair enough, here is a list of some supplies Dog and I need.
Sundown next day: Drifter sets pot of coffee and metal bowl full of beer on small camp fire, and opens letter.
Dearest Friend,
Just a few words to dispel your anxieties about man made natural disaster camps; there are probably forty thousand to fifty thousand citizens here. Camp is fenced in to protect us from outsiders wanting in to escape worsening conditions in this part of America. We are truly lucky ones despite less than perfect conditions. We at least have security, and solace knowing our federal government is doing everything it can to provide for us.
Sanitary conditions are an open ditch. Food is served once a day and consists of liquid powdered milk over uncooked rice. Obama Care is limited to barbiturates. Healthy camp residents are engaged in constructing red brick buildings to be used as showers. Rumors abound that our Emperor, will visit to dedicate new showers we are all looking forward to enjoying.
I bribed one of guards with my wedding rings to mail you this letter to let you know even though times may be hard, government is doing everything it can to help us rebuild ours’ and America’s future.
(Texas Drifter crumbles letter and envelope and gently drops into camp fire.)
Texas Drifter whispers: You know Dog, tears still never change anything.
(Picks up coffee pot and asks Dog): Want some coffee in your beer?
Dog (smiles by bearing teeth with soft growl):
Drifter: Just asking, I finish my coffee; you finish your beer; be time to go earn our meager wages.
End “Last Letter”
Closing thought, Bill Rights First Amendment is specific: “government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion …” for either spiritual or secular religions.
Secular religions are:
1. Marxist-fascists lust for power for greed
2. corporate fascists lust for power for greed
3. environmentalism lust for power for pseudo science
4. hatreds by heterophobes seeking societal “happy face” endorsements
5. minorities racial /ethnic hatreds of majorities
6. Islamic terrorists lust for sadistic power
Explain differences between those with spiritual based religions who respect First Amendment; and those with secular based religions who have total contempt for anything Constitution; most vocal secular based religious followers also have no problem persecuting and destroying - reader should already know list: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and other American patriots reader can list.
First negotiating point between spiritual religions and secular religions is that mutual respect must be verifiable. Second point is secular religions are not entitled to privilege of having government respect establishment of their secular religious beliefs. TRUE or FALSE
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Texas Drifter: Obama Planning on Third Term?
Library Entry # 636
Marshall’s Law Dateline - Any reader who believes Obama and his enforcers with passive support from Bush and Romney type Republicans, are not depending on a third executive branch term are just too blanking stupid to survive as a free American.
Writing exercise premise question: do Obama and his enforcers like Holder and others reader can list; have plans of ever leaving America’s highest political office?
Initial premise observation: provide any example of those abusing political powers voluntarily surrendering their political offices to face possible domestic war crimes trials. Especially when Marxist-fascist engaging in unconstitutional acts which could be classified as domestic war crimes, know that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will never force their Marxist-fascists allies to cease their dictatorial actions.
Policy examples shared between Obama and Bush-Romney type Republicans.
1. Both thrive as ruling elite aristocrats.
2. Both are fascists, Obama and Progressive Democrats are Marxist-fascists; while Obama’s Republicans are corporate fascists.
3. Both are internationalists and sworn opponents of anything serving America’s national economic interests; both rely on Federal Reserve to manage international financial interests with America last attitude.
4. Both desire to replace America’s middle class attitude and middle class with cheap imported labor from places like India; and cheap illegal immigrant labor from places like Mexico and other third world countries.
5. Both depend on public subsidy addicts and some public sector unions which are all paid through eventually destructive national debt.
6. Both use and or rely on domestic terrorist acting bureaucrats to keep majority of Americans living in fear of federal government. Example Obama used IRS to engage in political genocide against Tea Party in 2012 election cycle with re-assuring support from Bush and Romney type Republicans.
7. Both say or do or pretend to be anything to stay in power; good examples include Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, Biden, Reid, plus others reader can list. Example Republican Senate leaders like Cornyn voting to allow Senate to vote on issues he knows Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats have enough votes to win. Perhaps someone should tell Cornyn and other conservative leaders that selling out conservatives behind closed doors is not made right by saying right lies in public.
8. Both support and promote hatred by minorities against different majorities like: races, ethnic groups, including heterosexuals, traditional gender roles, private sector groups, and Judeo-Christians and other “not politically correct” groups.
9. Both rely on public education programs to program future American children into public subsidy citizen zombies.
10. Reader can add other comparisons to above list.
Political elites who build their careers on unconstitutional conduct can be expected with enough polite talk from conservative talk show hosts to voluntarily abandon their political powers to law abiding citizens. FALSE not TRUE
Brutal facts: one side are known supporters of post natal abortions, and will have no problems massacring your families in cold blood in front of you; while other side has no problem looking you eye to eye while promising to be your friend, before stabbing you in the back. Which side is which?
Some see glass as half full; other see glass as half empty; Texas Drifter does not see any glass.
Clue of some kind, evil has been force tempting and influencing human behavior since The Garden of Eden.
Evil among us in U.S. is nothing new; only different faces with different names promoting same human vices. Reader not sure of what vices are, perhaps reader should review Ten Commandments?
Another clue as question: Modern Obama Marxist-fascist and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats and their allies could be compared to Egypt’s Pharaoh and the “Golden Calf Builders” of Moses days. TRUE or FALSE
Additional comparison Rome had all the physical force that comes with absolute political power; while all Heaven’s Son had were his Father’s words. TRUE or FALSE
Consider following, America’s patriots have following words to consider
1. Act of Abjuration 1581
2. America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights
3. Declaration of Independence
4. U.S. Constitution
5. Bill of Rights
6. Ethical capitalism
7. Middle class attitudes
8. Abilities to form temporary verbal coalitions to manage evil among us in U.S.
America’s future may seem dark, but still offers hope since what is old adage; something about “pen is mightier than the sword” especially for those believing in self defense. TRUE or FALSE
Assignment question, recall repetition is good teaching tool. Balancing act for America’s future is not replacing Marxist-fascist like Stalin type (reader knows who), with corporate fascist Mussolini type (reader knows who), with conservative cult leader who becomes comparable to Hitler type.
Reader should never forget that there are many vain conservatives who have already formed cliques and cults who would have no problem managing “a rein of terror” as their closet mentor Robespierre. Reader might reference some truly evil accomplishments by Robespierre during French Revolution, if you doubt this Texas Drifter observation.
First of three bonus questions, wagering odds are fifty-fifty that Obama will decide to issue “just another uncontested” executive order to allow Obama to serve a third unelected Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Second, wagering odds are ninety-ten that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will tell Republican Senate and House leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list not to challenge Obama’s third unconstitutional Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Three, why would corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats support and defend such a policy? Answer simple, they do not want minorities to think they are racists; plus primary strategy of all cowards and traitors is live to never fight another day. TRUE not FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline - Any reader who believes Obama and his enforcers with passive support from Bush and Romney type Republicans, are not depending on a third executive branch term are just too blanking stupid to survive as a free American.
Writing exercise premise question: do Obama and his enforcers like Holder and others reader can list; have plans of ever leaving America’s highest political office?
Initial premise observation: provide any example of those abusing political powers voluntarily surrendering their political offices to face possible domestic war crimes trials. Especially when Marxist-fascist engaging in unconstitutional acts which could be classified as domestic war crimes, know that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will never force their Marxist-fascists allies to cease their dictatorial actions.
Policy examples shared between Obama and Bush-Romney type Republicans.
1. Both thrive as ruling elite aristocrats.
2. Both are fascists, Obama and Progressive Democrats are Marxist-fascists; while Obama’s Republicans are corporate fascists.
3. Both are internationalists and sworn opponents of anything serving America’s national economic interests; both rely on Federal Reserve to manage international financial interests with America last attitude.
4. Both desire to replace America’s middle class attitude and middle class with cheap imported labor from places like India; and cheap illegal immigrant labor from places like Mexico and other third world countries.
5. Both depend on public subsidy addicts and some public sector unions which are all paid through eventually destructive national debt.
6. Both use and or rely on domestic terrorist acting bureaucrats to keep majority of Americans living in fear of federal government. Example Obama used IRS to engage in political genocide against Tea Party in 2012 election cycle with re-assuring support from Bush and Romney type Republicans.
7. Both say or do or pretend to be anything to stay in power; good examples include Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, Biden, Reid, plus others reader can list. Example Republican Senate leaders like Cornyn voting to allow Senate to vote on issues he knows Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats have enough votes to win. Perhaps someone should tell Cornyn and other conservative leaders that selling out conservatives behind closed doors is not made right by saying right lies in public.
8. Both support and promote hatred by minorities against different majorities like: races, ethnic groups, including heterosexuals, traditional gender roles, private sector groups, and Judeo-Christians and other “not politically correct” groups.
9. Both rely on public education programs to program future American children into public subsidy citizen zombies.
10. Reader can add other comparisons to above list.
Political elites who build their careers on unconstitutional conduct can be expected with enough polite talk from conservative talk show hosts to voluntarily abandon their political powers to law abiding citizens. FALSE not TRUE
Brutal facts: one side are known supporters of post natal abortions, and will have no problems massacring your families in cold blood in front of you; while other side has no problem looking you eye to eye while promising to be your friend, before stabbing you in the back. Which side is which?
Some see glass as half full; other see glass as half empty; Texas Drifter does not see any glass.
Clue of some kind, evil has been force tempting and influencing human behavior since The Garden of Eden.
Evil among us in U.S. is nothing new; only different faces with different names promoting same human vices. Reader not sure of what vices are, perhaps reader should review Ten Commandments?
Another clue as question: Modern Obama Marxist-fascist and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats and their allies could be compared to Egypt’s Pharaoh and the “Golden Calf Builders” of Moses days. TRUE or FALSE
Additional comparison Rome had all the physical force that comes with absolute political power; while all Heaven’s Son had were his Father’s words. TRUE or FALSE
Consider following, America’s patriots have following words to consider
1. Act of Abjuration 1581
2. America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights
3. Declaration of Independence
4. U.S. Constitution
5. Bill of Rights
6. Ethical capitalism
7. Middle class attitudes
8. Abilities to form temporary verbal coalitions to manage evil among us in U.S.
America’s future may seem dark, but still offers hope since what is old adage; something about “pen is mightier than the sword” especially for those believing in self defense. TRUE or FALSE
Assignment question, recall repetition is good teaching tool. Balancing act for America’s future is not replacing Marxist-fascist like Stalin type (reader knows who), with corporate fascist Mussolini type (reader knows who), with conservative cult leader who becomes comparable to Hitler type.
Reader should never forget that there are many vain conservatives who have already formed cliques and cults who would have no problem managing “a rein of terror” as their closet mentor Robespierre. Reader might reference some truly evil accomplishments by Robespierre during French Revolution, if you doubt this Texas Drifter observation.
First of three bonus questions, wagering odds are fifty-fifty that Obama will decide to issue “just another uncontested” executive order to allow Obama to serve a third unelected Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Second, wagering odds are ninety-ten that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will tell Republican Senate and House leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list not to challenge Obama’s third unconstitutional Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Three, why would corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats support and defend such a policy? Answer simple, they do not want minorities to think they are racists; plus primary strategy of all cowards and traitors is live to never fight another day. TRUE not FALSE
Friday, February 14, 2014
Texas Drifter: No Tears for Valentine
Library Entry # 635
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continued from Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test – Library Entry # 634 - Since reader can finish dialogue for above story, Texas Drifter being still bored from re-arranging serious words. Still needs passing non-fiction story thought, “No Tears for Valentine” might be partial solution. Writing exercise will strive to have happier ending than vampire armadillos feeding to breed during every February.
Players:
1. Protagonist (P)
2. Sheriff (S)
3. Sheriff’s Deputy (SD)
“No Tears for Valentine”
ACT I
P:
Old men call her lady
Rich ones page a servant
Doesn’t matter what they sing
Valentine’s back in love
Still recall our start
Good memories die last
P:
Spoke up too soon
Thought I desired a wife.
Had to meet her people
Never be the same.
Father talked of poverty
No one really listened
Mother brought up children
Sister grinned Valentine’s pure
Her husband fondled my joy
Nephew to be tortured the dog
Can’t believe this is happening
Need to take a break
Planning to tolerate them
Valentine takes my side
(Sometimes good memories fade away)
ACT II
P:
Tired of your load
Must remove this ring
Should have known better
Trapped by your style
Conned your vain friends
They enjoyed the gossip
Made me a success
To unlock your mansion
P:
Not really bitter
Weary of group pride
Vacate this my place
Bear sons for my enemies
Am tired of excuses
Your type of lie
Valentine seeks her chills
Holding carrots for mules
P:
Simpler to take the loss
Not too addicted to stay
In the wrong place
At the wrong time
Timing just not there
Found a violent crime
Found bloody notebook
Near an ugly corpse
P:
Felt a little fear
When victim’s aura
Gently soaked my soul
No time for tears
One score to settle
F-150 running fine
Hands on the wheel
Two stops to Make
ACT III
P: You here to arrest me?
S: Talk about it
Couple questions.
S: Why not go to wake?
Why not go to burying?
P: Never see them dead
Never sure they died
S: You shoot that man?
P: Got less than deserved
S: That is a fact
Was it self defense?
P: He grabbed
I drew
Before you ask
Deserved all six
S: Looks like you’re leaving
P: Going South then some
S: Stop by office in morning
Or never come back
P: I will do that
S: Night
(Deputy back at sheriff’s F-150)
SD: You let him go
S: He won’t be back
Like he said
Self defense / deserved more
Man not known to lie
S: Only thing to live for
One dying good memory
He won’t be back
Why waste our time
End “No Tears for Valentine”
Question was that a happier ending than vampire armadillos feeding to breed in middle of February? TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Reference “Texas Drifter: Valentine Love Story” | All Right Magazine – Jan. 2013
Editor Marshall’s Note: Texas Drifter informed me that he uses “visual prose” (process of using few words as possible to inform and entertain) as warm up writing exercises. Example, consider following warm up exercise for Library Entry # 636 “Obama Planning on Third Term?”
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continued from Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test – Library Entry # 634 - Since reader can finish dialogue for above story, Texas Drifter being still bored from re-arranging serious words. Still needs passing non-fiction story thought, “No Tears for Valentine” might be partial solution. Writing exercise will strive to have happier ending than vampire armadillos feeding to breed during every February.
Players:
1. Protagonist (P)
2. Sheriff (S)
3. Sheriff’s Deputy (SD)
“No Tears for Valentine”
ACT I
P:
Old men call her lady
Rich ones page a servant
Doesn’t matter what they sing
Valentine’s back in love
Still recall our start
Good memories die last
P:
Spoke up too soon
Thought I desired a wife.
Had to meet her people
Never be the same.
Father talked of poverty
No one really listened
Mother brought up children
Sister grinned Valentine’s pure
Her husband fondled my joy
Nephew to be tortured the dog
Can’t believe this is happening
Need to take a break
Planning to tolerate them
Valentine takes my side
(Sometimes good memories fade away)
ACT II
P:
Tired of your load
Must remove this ring
Should have known better
Trapped by your style
Conned your vain friends
They enjoyed the gossip
Made me a success
To unlock your mansion
P:
Not really bitter
Weary of group pride
Vacate this my place
Bear sons for my enemies
Am tired of excuses
Your type of lie
Valentine seeks her chills
Holding carrots for mules
P:
Simpler to take the loss
Not too addicted to stay
In the wrong place
At the wrong time
Timing just not there
Found a violent crime
Found bloody notebook
Near an ugly corpse
P:
Felt a little fear
When victim’s aura
Gently soaked my soul
No time for tears
One score to settle
F-150 running fine
Hands on the wheel
Two stops to Make
ACT III
P: You here to arrest me?
S: Talk about it
Couple questions.
S: Why not go to wake?
Why not go to burying?
P: Never see them dead
Never sure they died
S: You shoot that man?
P: Got less than deserved
S: That is a fact
Was it self defense?
P: He grabbed
I drew
Before you ask
Deserved all six
S: Looks like you’re leaving
P: Going South then some
S: Stop by office in morning
Or never come back
P: I will do that
S: Night
(Deputy back at sheriff’s F-150)
SD: You let him go
S: He won’t be back
Like he said
Self defense / deserved more
Man not known to lie
S: Only thing to live for
One dying good memory
He won’t be back
Why waste our time
End “No Tears for Valentine”
Question was that a happier ending than vampire armadillos feeding to breed in middle of February? TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Reference “Texas Drifter: Valentine Love Story” | All Right Magazine – Jan. 2013
Editor Marshall’s Note: Texas Drifter informed me that he uses “visual prose” (process of using few words as possible to inform and entertain) as warm up writing exercises. Example, consider following warm up exercise for Library Entry # 636 “Obama Planning on Third Term?”
Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test
Library Entry # 634
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continuously re-arranging serious words can become boring. Reader can test their painting with words like artists use colors skills. How by inserting title plus finishing last half of following visual prose without music writing exercise.
Title (insert by reader)
Players: Old Man (OM) and Boy (Boy)
Story concept old man sharing some of his life experiences lessons with young boy.
Act I
OM – Hello boy, why are you bothering this old man during an increasingly beautiful cloudless sunset?
Boy – I sense storm clouds rumbling on my America’s horizon.
OM – I know waiting for inevitable sorrows is always hardest part.
Boy – Can’t my America’s approaching storm be stopped?
OM – Not likely, how do you talk evil that are ignorant of their being evil; into changing their evil ways and becoming virtuous?
Boy – Sounds like my America’s future is hopeless.
OM – No sir just another destiny road, leading Americans’ to their own self destructive fate.
Boy – What does that mean?
OM – Never lose your faith, and keep your powder dry; you will always need one and sometimes the other.
Boy - I am listening, keep talking.
(Reader’s assignment: Insert dialogue for remainder of this writing exercise. Prove to yourself that you have not lost your free will to stay free; followed by creating title for this writing exercise.)
OM -
Boy –
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy –
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy –
OM -
Boy -
(Last line either OM or Boy's - reader's choice)
***
(End reader’s assignment)
Hopefully Editor Marshall will be satisfied that this mid-February story has a happier ending than last year’s “Valentine Love Story” with surprise ending about vampire armadillos feeding to breed around middle of February. Reader can decide on their own by referencing. Texas Drifter: Valentine Love Story | All Right Magazine – Jan. 2013 How, by reciting in randomly arranged words uplifting non-fiction love stories based on real world events …
Since reader can finish dialogue for above story, Texas Drifter being still bored from re-arranging serious words. Still needs passing non-fiction story thought, “No Tears for Valentine” might be partial solution. Writing exercise will strive to have happier ending than vampire armadillos feeding to breed during every February. TRUE not FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continuously re-arranging serious words can become boring. Reader can test their painting with words like artists use colors skills. How by inserting title plus finishing last half of following visual prose without music writing exercise.
Title (insert by reader)
Players: Old Man (OM) and Boy (Boy)
Story concept old man sharing some of his life experiences lessons with young boy.
Act I
OM – Hello boy, why are you bothering this old man during an increasingly beautiful cloudless sunset?
Boy – I sense storm clouds rumbling on my America’s horizon.
OM – I know waiting for inevitable sorrows is always hardest part.
Boy – Can’t my America’s approaching storm be stopped?
OM – Not likely, how do you talk evil that are ignorant of their being evil; into changing their evil ways and becoming virtuous?
Boy – Sounds like my America’s future is hopeless.
OM – No sir just another destiny road, leading Americans’ to their own self destructive fate.
Boy – What does that mean?
OM – Never lose your faith, and keep your powder dry; you will always need one and sometimes the other.
Boy - I am listening, keep talking.
(Reader’s assignment: Insert dialogue for remainder of this writing exercise. Prove to yourself that you have not lost your free will to stay free; followed by creating title for this writing exercise.)
OM -
Boy –
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy –
OM -
Boy -
OM -
Boy –
OM -
Boy -
(Last line either OM or Boy's - reader's choice)
***
(End reader’s assignment)
Hopefully Editor Marshall will be satisfied that this mid-February story has a happier ending than last year’s “Valentine Love Story” with surprise ending about vampire armadillos feeding to breed around middle of February. Reader can decide on their own by referencing. Texas Drifter: Valentine Love Story | All Right Magazine – Jan. 2013 How, by reciting in randomly arranged words uplifting non-fiction love stories based on real world events …
Since reader can finish dialogue for above story, Texas Drifter being still bored from re-arranging serious words. Still needs passing non-fiction story thought, “No Tears for Valentine” might be partial solution. Writing exercise will strive to have happier ending than vampire armadillos feeding to breed during every February. TRUE not FALSE
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Texas Drifter: Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms
Library Entry # 633
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Reader not familiar with principle of acquiring something like money or respect as result of actions performed might choose to not continue reading “Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms".
Some definitions:
1. Tolerate - unsympathetic indulgences for practices differing from one’s own standards.
2. Advocate – one who pleads the case of another.
3. Synonym – two words that have nearly similar meanings. Example, celebrate is closer in meaning to advocate than advocate is to tolerate.
Many Americans seem to feel that forcing one to tolerate their behavior requires one to advocate or celebrate their free will decisions. Like hetero-phobes expecting all citizens to issue them a certificate of appreciation for their free will fringe standards life styles.
Clarification, pursuit of other free choices like drug addiction, racial / ethnic hatreds, adulterous conduct, promiscuity between consenting adults, forced equal distribution of others’ property beneficiaries; theology haters like Islamic terrorists, may be tolerated; until their selfish greed or hatreds become actions which threatens other peoples’ lives, health, safety, or properties.
Despite what many liberals and other world owes us bullies promote with their self consuming hatreds; toleration of what some might describe as decadent lifestyle philosophies do not automatically entitle one to any of the following:
1. public acceptance
2. public encouragement
3. public promotion
4. public advocacy
5. public rewards or benefits
6. public privileges
7. public celebrations
8. other reader might list
Recall freedom of association includes freedom of non-association; based in part on equal opportunity for all with special privilege for none.
Also, First Amendment summary: government does not have authority to respect establishment of religion; which means government does not have authority to respect establishment of non-religious doctrines.
Ideologies or beliefs like hetero-phobias; racial/ethnic hatreds; gender hatreds; ethical capitalism hatreds; constitutional due process hatreds. Plus special privileges for those too blanked up to know they are blanked up may be tolerated by government, but should not respect establishment by governments. TRUE or FALSE
Translation, Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats; Obama Republicans like McConnell, Cornyn, and Boehner; Hollywood liberals; some conservative television / radio celebrities, all have free will rights to be evil among us in U.S. Just as, other Americans have rights not to associate with, or reward those engaging in lap licker political correctness for popularity often measured by media ratings.
Hopefully reader will remember that tolerating self destructive evils does not mean reader needs to advocate, or celebrate actions mentioned in above paragraph. TRUE or FALSE
Brutal translation, just because one has free will right to choose to experiment with or live life on dark side; does not mean their choice also come with rights to force others to celebrate their conduct. TRUE or FALSE
First clue for “world owes me whiners” – as the world including society does not owe anyone anything; the world including society does not owe you professional world owes us whiners anything either; get used to it
Second clue, as repetition is good training tool, short excerpt follows from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 251: Texas Drifter: Was James’ Brother Jude Right?
Texas Drifter knew a father who gave his heroin addicted daughter money so she did not have to prostitute herself or steal to get money to buy her heroin. Her father asked me what I thought, told him he and his daughter were going down a road without a happy ending. He said I did not know what it was like to have a heroin addicted daughter. With that I agreed, but said I knew what it was like to be blinded by bad decisions. We have never spoken since.
Texas Drifter might tolerate a strumpet’s nothing left to compromise life style; Texas Drifter is not likely to advocate for, or celebrate a strumpet’s nothing left to compromise self destructive life style. Seems there is a difference between offering help, and rewarding undesirable conduct in name of politically correct compassion. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Reader not familiar with principle of acquiring something like money or respect as result of actions performed might choose to not continue reading “Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms".
Some definitions:
1. Tolerate - unsympathetic indulgences for practices differing from one’s own standards.
2. Advocate – one who pleads the case of another.
3. Synonym – two words that have nearly similar meanings. Example, celebrate is closer in meaning to advocate than advocate is to tolerate.
Many Americans seem to feel that forcing one to tolerate their behavior requires one to advocate or celebrate their free will decisions. Like hetero-phobes expecting all citizens to issue them a certificate of appreciation for their free will fringe standards life styles.
Clarification, pursuit of other free choices like drug addiction, racial / ethnic hatreds, adulterous conduct, promiscuity between consenting adults, forced equal distribution of others’ property beneficiaries; theology haters like Islamic terrorists, may be tolerated; until their selfish greed or hatreds become actions which threatens other peoples’ lives, health, safety, or properties.
Despite what many liberals and other world owes us bullies promote with their self consuming hatreds; toleration of what some might describe as decadent lifestyle philosophies do not automatically entitle one to any of the following:
1. public acceptance
2. public encouragement
3. public promotion
4. public advocacy
5. public rewards or benefits
6. public privileges
7. public celebrations
8. other reader might list
Recall freedom of association includes freedom of non-association; based in part on equal opportunity for all with special privilege for none.
Also, First Amendment summary: government does not have authority to respect establishment of religion; which means government does not have authority to respect establishment of non-religious doctrines.
Ideologies or beliefs like hetero-phobias; racial/ethnic hatreds; gender hatreds; ethical capitalism hatreds; constitutional due process hatreds. Plus special privileges for those too blanked up to know they are blanked up may be tolerated by government, but should not respect establishment by governments. TRUE or FALSE
Translation, Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats; Obama Republicans like McConnell, Cornyn, and Boehner; Hollywood liberals; some conservative television / radio celebrities, all have free will rights to be evil among us in U.S. Just as, other Americans have rights not to associate with, or reward those engaging in lap licker political correctness for popularity often measured by media ratings.
Hopefully reader will remember that tolerating self destructive evils does not mean reader needs to advocate, or celebrate actions mentioned in above paragraph. TRUE or FALSE
Brutal translation, just because one has free will right to choose to experiment with or live life on dark side; does not mean their choice also come with rights to force others to celebrate their conduct. TRUE or FALSE
First clue for “world owes me whiners” – as the world including society does not owe anyone anything; the world including society does not owe you professional world owes us whiners anything either; get used to it
Second clue, as repetition is good training tool, short excerpt follows from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 251: Texas Drifter: Was James’ Brother Jude Right?
Texas Drifter knew a father who gave his heroin addicted daughter money so she did not have to prostitute herself or steal to get money to buy her heroin. Her father asked me what I thought, told him he and his daughter were going down a road without a happy ending. He said I did not know what it was like to have a heroin addicted daughter. With that I agreed, but said I knew what it was like to be blinded by bad decisions. We have never spoken since.
Texas Drifter might tolerate a strumpet’s nothing left to compromise life style; Texas Drifter is not likely to advocate for, or celebrate a strumpet’s nothing left to compromise self destructive life style. Seems there is a difference between offering help, and rewarding undesirable conduct in name of politically correct compassion. TRUE or FALSE
Monday, February 10, 2014
Texas Drifter: Red States Beware Yankee Conservatives
Library Entry # 632
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Leaders without followers are impotent clowns. What kind of follower are you?
There are two types of basic followers:
1. partners / team members
2. groupies / cult zombies / “bullet catchers”
This writing exercise theme suggests too many Yankee conservatives consider citizens of Red States to be groupies, cult zombies, and or bullet catchers.
Definition of carpetbagger is Northerner usually Republican in South after Civil War; now usually Yankee conservative in Red States following North’s contemporary economic collapse. These unscrupulous Northerners were and are motivated by unethical capitalist profits.
Definition of Scalawag was Southerner after Civil War acting like Northern Republicans and or Yankee conservatives. Contemporary examples include Texas U.S. Senator Cornyn and Texas Governor Perry.
This writing exercise theme expresses views that non-Yankee conservatives should expect to be treated like equal partners of America’s political conservative movement; not “red headed step children” followers of Yankee Republican carpetbaggers or scalawags.
Explanation of red headed step children: “A term that originated out of the common mistreatment and social ostracism of redheaded individuals (gingers). A redheaded individual born into(legitimately or not), or adopted into a family of non-redheads was typically subject to physical and emotional abuse, and usually short handed when it came to financial matters in the family, such as the estate or any savings the family had acquired. Today, the term can be applied to an individual or group of individuals who are outcasts, or are typically dealt the worst hand in society. I ought to beat you like a red headed stepchild.” by Apple Flapper April 17, 2009.
Players’ brief guide in America’s contemporary political environment:
1. Marxist-Fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama; Clinton’s; and others reader can list.
2. Internationalist corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats like McConnell; Cornyn; Boehner; Bush Clan; Wall Street Journal; Corporate fascist Chamber of Commerce; and others reader can list.
3. Yankee conservatives mostly talk show celebrities; some conservative educational institutions; and non-profit foundations plus others reader can list. Note- these Yankee conservatives become carpet baggers when they migrate from their Northern “blue” states to “rest of America’s “red” states.
4. Non-involved citizens who just do not care about anything except their own selfish needs.
5. “Cross America Conservatives” who generally represent heart and soul of America’s middle class attitudes’ traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, and ethical capitalism; plus other virtues reader can list.
6. All allies; collaborators, covert supporters for each of above groups reader can list.
Brief review of “leader – follower” dynamics: leaders cannot lead without followers. Followers can be volunteers or employees. Repetition is good training tool. There are two types of basic followers: partners / team members and groupies / cult zombies / “bullet catchers.
One thing that separates good leaders form bad leaders is distinctions between “patriotic middleclass attitudes and leaders motivated by vanity driven “affluenza syndrome”. Reader can reference Marshall's Law Texas Drifter Library - Texas Drifter: Affluenza Why D.C. Elites Blanking Crazy? - Library Entry # 631. Marshall's Law Dateline – Has a scientific break though now …
Some identifying traits of Yankee conservatives, Yankee Republican carpetbaggers like to trash Southerners as slave owners. Reality is estimated ninety five percent of Southerners living in South during 1860’s never owned slaves.
Carpetbaggers and scalawags like to blame Southerners for associations like KKK, and delaying civil rights movement. Brutal truth is that had Yankee Republicans and their invading carpetbaggers not unleashed economic genocide on “vanquished” Southerners following Civil War affects of KKK and opposition to civil rights movement would have probably been less influential in “reconstruction” of Southern States now mostly called Red States.
Excerpt from Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 585: Following are facts: Yankee Republican Carpetbaggers and Scalawags terrorized Southerners with their “Ironclad Oath” and sadistic pleasure while “punishing” Southerners by abusing Republican police state powers. Reader needs to remember the “evil” carpetbaggers were all Republicans.
Republican Carpetbagger Scalawag government ended in Texas when Democrat Richard Coke defeated Republican Edmund Davis for Texas Governor in 1873. The Democrat Governor created a new State Constitution for Texas and returned Texas to its rightful role of leadership in America.
Lesson is both Republicans and Democrats can at their “right time” in history can be good for America; and both can be cockroach excrement at the “wrong time” in history can be bad for America. (End excerpt also published: All Right Magazine - Texas Senator Cornyn A Greek tragedy?)
Yankee Republicans and conservatives have nothing but contempt for Southern States’ traditions, values, principles, and historical heroes like Presidents Jackson and T. Roosevelt. Timely reminder from Red States citizens might be we both share America’s traditions, values, and principles; so you snobs should stop urinating on our regions’ traditions and cultural history. After all our state is still red; can you say same about your state?
Refresher notes from Texas Drifter: State of Union One Word Can Save America Right Magazine ... Jan 28, 2014
(Excerpt) Definition of coalition is temporary alliance of different parties, organizations, or persons for joint mutually beneficial actions.
Marshall’s Law – coalitions survive and become successful by coalition members respecting similarities; tolerating differences. (End excerpt)
Yankee conservatives, carpet baggers, and scalawags should remember the following:
1. America’s enemy is not “Cross America non-Yankee Conservatives”.
2. “Cross America Non-Yankee Conservatives” will be treated like equal partners or team members; not groupies; cult zombies, or your bullet catchers in conservatives’ future efforts to save America from Marxist-fascist Progressives, corporate fascist Republican ruling class aristocrats; and all their evil among us in U.S.: allies, collaborators, and covert supporters.
Special message to America’s second, third, and fourth most popular conservative celebrities, your alliance might reconsider your vain condescending attitudes towards conservatives who can boast our states are still “red”.
Can you Yankee conservatives make same boast about not letting your states become “blue to purple” states?
Special question; for those who fled their states and have become carpet baggers in Texas. You cut and ran once from your last state; how can people of Texas not wonder if your cult will cut and run again?
Closing question for self appointed Yankee conservative leaders you need “Cross America Conservative Followers” skills, experiences, and resources more than we need your media ratings driven words. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Leaders without followers are impotent clowns. What kind of follower are you?
There are two types of basic followers:
1. partners / team members
2. groupies / cult zombies / “bullet catchers”
This writing exercise theme suggests too many Yankee conservatives consider citizens of Red States to be groupies, cult zombies, and or bullet catchers.
Definition of carpetbagger is Northerner usually Republican in South after Civil War; now usually Yankee conservative in Red States following North’s contemporary economic collapse. These unscrupulous Northerners were and are motivated by unethical capitalist profits.
Definition of Scalawag was Southerner after Civil War acting like Northern Republicans and or Yankee conservatives. Contemporary examples include Texas U.S. Senator Cornyn and Texas Governor Perry.
This writing exercise theme expresses views that non-Yankee conservatives should expect to be treated like equal partners of America’s political conservative movement; not “red headed step children” followers of Yankee Republican carpetbaggers or scalawags.
Explanation of red headed step children: “A term that originated out of the common mistreatment and social ostracism of redheaded individuals (gingers). A redheaded individual born into(legitimately or not), or adopted into a family of non-redheads was typically subject to physical and emotional abuse, and usually short handed when it came to financial matters in the family, such as the estate or any savings the family had acquired. Today, the term can be applied to an individual or group of individuals who are outcasts, or are typically dealt the worst hand in society. I ought to beat you like a red headed stepchild.” by Apple Flapper April 17, 2009.
Players’ brief guide in America’s contemporary political environment:
1. Marxist-Fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama; Clinton’s; and others reader can list.
2. Internationalist corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats like McConnell; Cornyn; Boehner; Bush Clan; Wall Street Journal; Corporate fascist Chamber of Commerce; and others reader can list.
3. Yankee conservatives mostly talk show celebrities; some conservative educational institutions; and non-profit foundations plus others reader can list. Note- these Yankee conservatives become carpet baggers when they migrate from their Northern “blue” states to “rest of America’s “red” states.
4. Non-involved citizens who just do not care about anything except their own selfish needs.
5. “Cross America Conservatives” who generally represent heart and soul of America’s middle class attitudes’ traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, and ethical capitalism; plus other virtues reader can list.
6. All allies; collaborators, covert supporters for each of above groups reader can list.
Brief review of “leader – follower” dynamics: leaders cannot lead without followers. Followers can be volunteers or employees. Repetition is good training tool. There are two types of basic followers: partners / team members and groupies / cult zombies / “bullet catchers.
One thing that separates good leaders form bad leaders is distinctions between “patriotic middleclass attitudes and leaders motivated by vanity driven “affluenza syndrome”. Reader can reference Marshall's Law Texas Drifter Library - Texas Drifter: Affluenza Why D.C. Elites Blanking Crazy? - Library Entry # 631. Marshall's Law Dateline – Has a scientific break though now …
Some identifying traits of Yankee conservatives, Yankee Republican carpetbaggers like to trash Southerners as slave owners. Reality is estimated ninety five percent of Southerners living in South during 1860’s never owned slaves.
Carpetbaggers and scalawags like to blame Southerners for associations like KKK, and delaying civil rights movement. Brutal truth is that had Yankee Republicans and their invading carpetbaggers not unleashed economic genocide on “vanquished” Southerners following Civil War affects of KKK and opposition to civil rights movement would have probably been less influential in “reconstruction” of Southern States now mostly called Red States.
Excerpt from Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 585: Following are facts: Yankee Republican Carpetbaggers and Scalawags terrorized Southerners with their “Ironclad Oath” and sadistic pleasure while “punishing” Southerners by abusing Republican police state powers. Reader needs to remember the “evil” carpetbaggers were all Republicans.
Republican Carpetbagger Scalawag government ended in Texas when Democrat Richard Coke defeated Republican Edmund Davis for Texas Governor in 1873. The Democrat Governor created a new State Constitution for Texas and returned Texas to its rightful role of leadership in America.
Lesson is both Republicans and Democrats can at their “right time” in history can be good for America; and both can be cockroach excrement at the “wrong time” in history can be bad for America. (End excerpt also published: All Right Magazine - Texas Senator Cornyn A Greek tragedy?)
Yankee Republicans and conservatives have nothing but contempt for Southern States’ traditions, values, principles, and historical heroes like Presidents Jackson and T. Roosevelt. Timely reminder from Red States citizens might be we both share America’s traditions, values, and principles; so you snobs should stop urinating on our regions’ traditions and cultural history. After all our state is still red; can you say same about your state?
Refresher notes from Texas Drifter: State of Union One Word Can Save America Right Magazine ... Jan 28, 2014
(Excerpt) Definition of coalition is temporary alliance of different parties, organizations, or persons for joint mutually beneficial actions.
Marshall’s Law – coalitions survive and become successful by coalition members respecting similarities; tolerating differences. (End excerpt)
Yankee conservatives, carpet baggers, and scalawags should remember the following:
1. America’s enemy is not “Cross America non-Yankee Conservatives”.
2. “Cross America Non-Yankee Conservatives” will be treated like equal partners or team members; not groupies; cult zombies, or your bullet catchers in conservatives’ future efforts to save America from Marxist-fascist Progressives, corporate fascist Republican ruling class aristocrats; and all their evil among us in U.S.: allies, collaborators, and covert supporters.
Special message to America’s second, third, and fourth most popular conservative celebrities, your alliance might reconsider your vain condescending attitudes towards conservatives who can boast our states are still “red”.
Can you Yankee conservatives make same boast about not letting your states become “blue to purple” states?
Special question; for those who fled their states and have become carpet baggers in Texas. You cut and ran once from your last state; how can people of Texas not wonder if your cult will cut and run again?
Closing question for self appointed Yankee conservative leaders you need “Cross America Conservative Followers” skills, experiences, and resources more than we need your media ratings driven words. TRUE or FALSE
Thursday, February 6, 2014
Texas Drifter: Affluenza Why D.C. Elites Blanking Crazy?
Library Entry # 631
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Has a scientific break though now acceptable “legal defense” determined that affluenza rationalizes why those most blessed by material possessions, seem most likely to violate their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend by supporting America last policies?
Background Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Affluenza, a portmanteau of affluence and influenza, is a term used by critics of consumerism.
In December 2013, State District Judge Jean Boyd sentenced a North Texas teenager, Ethan Couch[6][7] to 10 years probation for drunk driving and killing four pedestrians and injuring 11[8] after his attorneys successfully argued that the teen suffered from affluenza and needed rehabilitation, and not prison. The defendant was witnessed on surveillance video stealing beer from a store, driving with seven passengers in his father's Ford F-350, speeding (70 MPH in a 40 MPH zone), and had a blood alcohol content of .24%, three times the legal limit for an adult in Texas, when he was tested 3 hours after the accident. Traces of Valium were also in his system. G. Dick Miller, a psychologist hired as an expert by the defense, testified in court that the teen was a product of affluenza and was unable to link his bad behavior with consequences due to his parents teaching him that wealth buys privilege. The rehabilitation facility near Newport Beach, California that the teen will be attending will cost his family $450,000 annually … (end Wikipedia insert)
Affluenza is not modern concept, consider words by Aristotle:
Since repetition is a good teaching tool, recall Aristotle’s observations: Aristotle’s teachings were that the best states are those “wherein the middle classes are a more formidable part than either the rich or poor” (America's conservatives). Aristotle correctly observed that: an aristocratic state may be beneficial for a time, but aristocrats tend to deteriorate, and become the worst form of government (like corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats).
Aristotle correctly observed two thousand years in advance of America’s internationalist aristocrats: noble character is seldom found among those of noble birth, most who are good for nothing … highly gifted families often degenerate into maniacs.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes (like Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats) the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich (Republican establishment aristocrats) get the better of the poor, or the poor (Progressive Democrats) of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert) - Editor Marshall’s note: ( ) inserts by Editor’ Marshall would have probably been included by Aristotle if Aristotle were still writing?
Could some examples of those infected and affected by affluenza include following?
1. Obama and his Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and their allies, staff, and groupies, including Texas U.S. Progressive Democrat Representative Cuellar and others reader can list.
2. Hollywood celebrities reader can list
3. Socialist devoted millionaire and billionaires like those reader can list.
4. Racist, ethnic, heterophobes, and other haters enjoying financial benefits of affirmative action policies, programs, and laws.
5. Republican Senate and or House Leaders like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner and others reader can list
6. Republican establishment aristocrats like Bush Clan, their consultants, staff, and many others reader can list.
7. Reader can start random lists of all those suffering from affluenza threatening America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, ethical capitalism, middle class attitudes, national security plus other beliefs that made America Heaven’s favorite republic.
Now to brutal truths about how to manage affluenza threats that affect more than just the blanking crazy as referenced in this writing exercise title.
1. Accept President Jackson’s standard “equal opportunity without privilege”.
2. Therapy goal re-establish “middle class attitudes” as better mental health compass than selfish, lust driven, or greed motivated personality characteristics of affluenza symptoms.
3. Confinement in mental health facilities for estimated four hundred fifty thousand dollars a year. Just send bill to Obama Care which should in Americans dreams provide best cheapest health care in all past, present, and future human history.
4. Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.
*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt)
Battered citizen syndrome’s time may arrived since being exposed to too much wealth or too “easy” a life can be medically and legally determined to be a mental illness which rationalizes threatening, injuring, and even killing other inno0cents now called collateral damage. TRUE or FALSE
Then again, perhaps Texas Drifter is just too naïve; as affluenza might be legal defense for Obama and other Marxist-fascists along with corporate fascists like Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats to keep all monies they stole, while plundering America and pillaging Americans during their domestic reins of terror? TRUE maybe – FALSE maybe not – reader can decide right answer.
Clue: Affluenza could not possibly be making Washington D.C.’s political, economic, and social elites that blanking crazy; now could it?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Has a scientific break though now acceptable “legal defense” determined that affluenza rationalizes why those most blessed by material possessions, seem most likely to violate their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend by supporting America last policies?
Background Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Affluenza, a portmanteau of affluence and influenza, is a term used by critics of consumerism.
In December 2013, State District Judge Jean Boyd sentenced a North Texas teenager, Ethan Couch[6][7] to 10 years probation for drunk driving and killing four pedestrians and injuring 11[8] after his attorneys successfully argued that the teen suffered from affluenza and needed rehabilitation, and not prison. The defendant was witnessed on surveillance video stealing beer from a store, driving with seven passengers in his father's Ford F-350, speeding (70 MPH in a 40 MPH zone), and had a blood alcohol content of .24%, three times the legal limit for an adult in Texas, when he was tested 3 hours after the accident. Traces of Valium were also in his system. G. Dick Miller, a psychologist hired as an expert by the defense, testified in court that the teen was a product of affluenza and was unable to link his bad behavior with consequences due to his parents teaching him that wealth buys privilege. The rehabilitation facility near Newport Beach, California that the teen will be attending will cost his family $450,000 annually … (end Wikipedia insert)
Affluenza is not modern concept, consider words by Aristotle:
Since repetition is a good teaching tool, recall Aristotle’s observations: Aristotle’s teachings were that the best states are those “wherein the middle classes are a more formidable part than either the rich or poor” (America's conservatives). Aristotle correctly observed that: an aristocratic state may be beneficial for a time, but aristocrats tend to deteriorate, and become the worst form of government (like corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats).
Aristotle correctly observed two thousand years in advance of America’s internationalist aristocrats: noble character is seldom found among those of noble birth, most who are good for nothing … highly gifted families often degenerate into maniacs.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes (like Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats) the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich (Republican establishment aristocrats) get the better of the poor, or the poor (Progressive Democrats) of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert) - Editor Marshall’s note: ( ) inserts by Editor’ Marshall would have probably been included by Aristotle if Aristotle were still writing?
Could some examples of those infected and affected by affluenza include following?
1. Obama and his Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and their allies, staff, and groupies, including Texas U.S. Progressive Democrat Representative Cuellar and others reader can list.
2. Hollywood celebrities reader can list
3. Socialist devoted millionaire and billionaires like those reader can list.
4. Racist, ethnic, heterophobes, and other haters enjoying financial benefits of affirmative action policies, programs, and laws.
5. Republican Senate and or House Leaders like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner and others reader can list
6. Republican establishment aristocrats like Bush Clan, their consultants, staff, and many others reader can list.
7. Reader can start random lists of all those suffering from affluenza threatening America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, ethical capitalism, middle class attitudes, national security plus other beliefs that made America Heaven’s favorite republic.
Now to brutal truths about how to manage affluenza threats that affect more than just the blanking crazy as referenced in this writing exercise title.
1. Accept President Jackson’s standard “equal opportunity without privilege”.
2. Therapy goal re-establish “middle class attitudes” as better mental health compass than selfish, lust driven, or greed motivated personality characteristics of affluenza symptoms.
3. Confinement in mental health facilities for estimated four hundred fifty thousand dollars a year. Just send bill to Obama Care which should in Americans dreams provide best cheapest health care in all past, present, and future human history.
4. Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.
*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt)
Battered citizen syndrome’s time may arrived since being exposed to too much wealth or too “easy” a life can be medically and legally determined to be a mental illness which rationalizes threatening, injuring, and even killing other inno0cents now called collateral damage. TRUE or FALSE
Then again, perhaps Texas Drifter is just too naïve; as affluenza might be legal defense for Obama and other Marxist-fascists along with corporate fascists like Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats to keep all monies they stole, while plundering America and pillaging Americans during their domestic reins of terror? TRUE maybe – FALSE maybe not – reader can decide right answer.
Clue: Affluenza could not possibly be making Washington D.C.’s political, economic, and social elites that blanking crazy; now could it?
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Texas Drifter: Pop Culture Satan's Sirens
Library Entry # 630
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Legend describes Siren as a sea nymph (part woman and part bird) supposed to lure sailors to destruction on the rocks where the nymphs lived; "Odysseus ordered his crew to plug their ears so they would not hear the Siren's fatal song”
Some suggest that Satan’s Sirens lured supporters for past and contemporary evils like: Old Testaments’ “Golden Calf” builders; Rome’s Caligula and Nero; Hitler, Cuba’s Castro brothers; North Korean leader Kim Jong-un; Marxist Democrats’ Obama; and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats.
Temporary back slide identifies possible titles for this writing exercise as:
1. Pop Culture America’s Vanity Drug
2. Pop Culture America’s Achilles Heel
3. Pop Culture Satan’s Sirens.
This writing exercise premise is based on words by wiser person than Texas Drifter. Some wise person once said “There are many voices in the world; they all have meanings. Some voices solicit evil and some voices promote virtue.”
Preview question: which voice will you my reader serve: Contemporary American pop culture Sirens; or America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, and ethical capitalism?
Clue: Timeless truths create enemies, and judgment day is always personal.
Contemporary pop culture Sirens can sometimes be identified by many of Sirens luring clichés like following
1. Make love not war.
2. Feels good do it.
3. Give my “piece” a chance.
4. My love your road side park.
5. Stealing for welfare not a sin.
6. Stealing from rich not a sin.
7. Hating whites is right.
8. World owes me I am a victim.
9. World owes me I am (fill in blank).
10. Obama your new god (Editor Marshall’s note – small “g”).
11. RINOs Obama lap lickers.
12. Governments best anti-Christ utopians.
Reader can add to list.
What did sixties television detective used to say: “Just the facts”?
Some reasons America is self destructing:
1. Excessive deficit budget deficits
2. Excessive governments’ regulations in every facet of all Americans’ private sector lives
3. America last “make everyone the same” motivated public education system at all levels primary, secondary, university
4. Replacing civil liberties for all citizens (compare to President Jackson’s “equal opportunity without privilege”), with affirmative action type “special civil liberties” for racists, ethnic, special interest haters.
5. Replacing ethical capitalism for Americans with middle class attitudes with Marxist-fascism for Obama and Progressive Democrats and corporate fascism for Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats
6. Rewarding law breakers like illegal immigrants and then punishing America’s law abiding citizens and legal residents
7. Betraying America’s allies like Israel and others reader can list; and by rewarding America’s sworn adversaries like Mexico, and sworn enemies like China, Islamic fascists like Iran and other groups like Islamic terrorist and Mexico’s drug cartels
8. Threatening America’s national security, by emasculating America’s armed forces with: inexperienced officers while deleting resources “necessary” for swift lethal victories - Plus depriving America’s military disabled and veterans of promised survival and retirement benefits
9. Spying and harassing America’s private citizens with governments’ agencies trying to become Obama’s and Obama Republicans Gestapo like protectors
10. Reader can add to list
Self destructive crises are threatening Heaven’s favorite constitutional republic. What are some of “fatal luring calls”: being produced by America’s Pop Culture Sirens? Consider following.
1. Civil rights to get high smoking pot
2. Civil rights to have full term abortions
3. Civil rights for same sex or any couples marriages
4. Civil rights for illegal immigrants to have more societal rights and more free tax payer financial benefits than law abiding citizens and legal residents
5. Civil rights for some minorities to hate all other Americans
6. Civil rights for pop culture celebrities to tell all others how to live their lives
7. Civil rights for pop culture celebrities, who consider themselves as being “better class of people” then ordinary others; should include being able to force ordinary others to worship celebrities’ promiscuous decadent life styles
8. Reader can add to list
Is America’s Pop Culture Sirens’ propaganda machine “ear poison” being delivered by two sources?
1. “Main stream media” celebrities whose loyalties are limited for Obama’s Marxist-fascism.
2. “Non-main stream media” like Wall Street Journal and Fox News for corporate fascist Obama Republicans
Texas Drifter is not accusing, just asking. Reader can reference All Right Magazine: Texas Drifter: First Amendment Protects Asking Questions published December 17, 2013
Marshall’s Law Dateline – First Amendment component “Freedom of Speech” guarantees Americans’ rights to ask questions no how un-nerving the answers.
Reader can reference entire text if interested.
Even Obama Republicans like Boehner, McConnell, Cornyn and others reader can list; if they were ever honest would admit that their vanities live to be stroked by Obama’s main stream media celebrities also known as Obama’s Sirens. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus questions: One - America’s Pop Culture Satan’s Sirens have no American values, traditions, principles: to serve, honor or defend. Why, America’s contemporary Sirens are only motivated by promises in the dark; along with “do it if it feels good no matter how many innocents get hurt” from their selfish lusts like greed, vanity, and promiscuity. TRUE or FALSE
Two - What could be alternatives to above described America’s Pop Culture Satan’s Sirens? Perhaps starting place would be to identify one’s “starting place” guiding principles instead of starting with reflexes just following lust. Maybe second alternative involves ignoring and tolerating fool’s behavior provided they do not use extortion or force to lure their victims TRUE or FALSE.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Legend describes Siren as a sea nymph (part woman and part bird) supposed to lure sailors to destruction on the rocks where the nymphs lived; "Odysseus ordered his crew to plug their ears so they would not hear the Siren's fatal song”
Some suggest that Satan’s Sirens lured supporters for past and contemporary evils like: Old Testaments’ “Golden Calf” builders; Rome’s Caligula and Nero; Hitler, Cuba’s Castro brothers; North Korean leader Kim Jong-un; Marxist Democrats’ Obama; and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats.
Temporary back slide identifies possible titles for this writing exercise as:
1. Pop Culture America’s Vanity Drug
2. Pop Culture America’s Achilles Heel
3. Pop Culture Satan’s Sirens.
This writing exercise premise is based on words by wiser person than Texas Drifter. Some wise person once said “There are many voices in the world; they all have meanings. Some voices solicit evil and some voices promote virtue.”
Preview question: which voice will you my reader serve: Contemporary American pop culture Sirens; or America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights, constitutional due processes, and ethical capitalism?
Clue: Timeless truths create enemies, and judgment day is always personal.
Contemporary pop culture Sirens can sometimes be identified by many of Sirens luring clichés like following
1. Make love not war.
2. Feels good do it.
3. Give my “piece” a chance.
4. My love your road side park.
5. Stealing for welfare not a sin.
6. Stealing from rich not a sin.
7. Hating whites is right.
8. World owes me I am a victim.
9. World owes me I am (fill in blank).
10. Obama your new god (Editor Marshall’s note – small “g”).
11. RINOs Obama lap lickers.
12. Governments best anti-Christ utopians.
Reader can add to list.
What did sixties television detective used to say: “Just the facts”?
Some reasons America is self destructing:
1. Excessive deficit budget deficits
2. Excessive governments’ regulations in every facet of all Americans’ private sector lives
3. America last “make everyone the same” motivated public education system at all levels primary, secondary, university
4. Replacing civil liberties for all citizens (compare to President Jackson’s “equal opportunity without privilege”), with affirmative action type “special civil liberties” for racists, ethnic, special interest haters.
5. Replacing ethical capitalism for Americans with middle class attitudes with Marxist-fascism for Obama and Progressive Democrats and corporate fascism for Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats
6. Rewarding law breakers like illegal immigrants and then punishing America’s law abiding citizens and legal residents
7. Betraying America’s allies like Israel and others reader can list; and by rewarding America’s sworn adversaries like Mexico, and sworn enemies like China, Islamic fascists like Iran and other groups like Islamic terrorist and Mexico’s drug cartels
8. Threatening America’s national security, by emasculating America’s armed forces with: inexperienced officers while deleting resources “necessary” for swift lethal victories - Plus depriving America’s military disabled and veterans of promised survival and retirement benefits
9. Spying and harassing America’s private citizens with governments’ agencies trying to become Obama’s and Obama Republicans Gestapo like protectors
10. Reader can add to list
Self destructive crises are threatening Heaven’s favorite constitutional republic. What are some of “fatal luring calls”: being produced by America’s Pop Culture Sirens? Consider following.
1. Civil rights to get high smoking pot
2. Civil rights to have full term abortions
3. Civil rights for same sex or any couples marriages
4. Civil rights for illegal immigrants to have more societal rights and more free tax payer financial benefits than law abiding citizens and legal residents
5. Civil rights for some minorities to hate all other Americans
6. Civil rights for pop culture celebrities to tell all others how to live their lives
7. Civil rights for pop culture celebrities, who consider themselves as being “better class of people” then ordinary others; should include being able to force ordinary others to worship celebrities’ promiscuous decadent life styles
8. Reader can add to list
Is America’s Pop Culture Sirens’ propaganda machine “ear poison” being delivered by two sources?
1. “Main stream media” celebrities whose loyalties are limited for Obama’s Marxist-fascism.
2. “Non-main stream media” like Wall Street Journal and Fox News for corporate fascist Obama Republicans
Texas Drifter is not accusing, just asking. Reader can reference All Right Magazine: Texas Drifter: First Amendment Protects Asking Questions published December 17, 2013
Marshall’s Law Dateline – First Amendment component “Freedom of Speech” guarantees Americans’ rights to ask questions no how un-nerving the answers.
Reader can reference entire text if interested.
Even Obama Republicans like Boehner, McConnell, Cornyn and others reader can list; if they were ever honest would admit that their vanities live to be stroked by Obama’s main stream media celebrities also known as Obama’s Sirens. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus questions: One - America’s Pop Culture Satan’s Sirens have no American values, traditions, principles: to serve, honor or defend. Why, America’s contemporary Sirens are only motivated by promises in the dark; along with “do it if it feels good no matter how many innocents get hurt” from their selfish lusts like greed, vanity, and promiscuity. TRUE or FALSE
Two - What could be alternatives to above described America’s Pop Culture Satan’s Sirens? Perhaps starting place would be to identify one’s “starting place” guiding principles instead of starting with reflexes just following lust. Maybe second alternative involves ignoring and tolerating fool’s behavior provided they do not use extortion or force to lure their victims TRUE or FALSE.
Monday, February 3, 2014
Texas Drifter: Some Pro Lifers Hypocrites?
Library Entry # 629
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Are pro lifers hypocrites, who protest killing of yet unborn who do not protest Obama Care killing: the already born like premature children, sick and elderly? Murdering how, denying services with higher premiums, higher deductibles, larger co-payments, and denying selected services for those with “not viable” futures.
Could partial answer to some pro lifers being hypocrites include pro lifers who trade their responsibilities of ministering to troubled souls for more government legislation and laws?
Definition of hypocrite is one who expresses virtues or qualities one does not have or possess. Example of hypocrites include Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats serving as Unites States Republican Senate and House leaders, their staff, consultants, and allies.
Some have suggested that there are too many cases of killing unborn because there are too many ministers and preachers setting on their getting fatter by day backsides; while counting their congregations tithing’s; as opposed to spending time ministering to those who could benefit from moral teachings to save yet born.
Seems too many self appointed “religious leaders” have forgotten that where the heart goes the body follows; while unmanaged thoughts tend to lead body towards spontaneous lusts.
Then again, ministering to confused or needy might deprive them of time to raise adequate donations; to build idols to show Heaven what an exalted worshipers they have become.
Texas Drifter could use reader’s help in finding passage about the sinner needing to pay commissions to self appointed emissary (insert minister or pastor’s name) acting as “middle man” to receive Salvation offered by Heaven’s Son.
Refresher excerpt notes from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 085 “America’s First Tradition” published 10-16-08.
Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."
Translation depending on government legislation to protect not yet born is fool’s path. States Rights like those is Texas may “regulate” behavior; changing moral objectives requires teachings about right and wrong not warnings about what is legal and illegal. If relying on legislation to change personal conduct works so well; guess there have become negligible alcohol related deaths on American highways?
Texas Drifter also needs reader to help me locate passage about passing responsibilities to help truly poor on to government. Seems estimated seventeen trillion dollars to win “war on poverty” is about what represents America’s national debt. Seems there are more perpetual professional poor than when war on poverty began.
With Obama Care on America’s horizon and “war on poverty” and legislation against drunk drivers being so unsuccessful; how many yet born, premature born, already born children, plus sick and elderly will pro lifer hypocrites be sending to their deaths by depending on government policies to replace ministering to confused, scared, tired, truly and other needy?
Another issue involves pro lifer hypocrites supporting porous borders, which allows law breakers called illegal immigrants to enter America; and commit atrocities against American citizens and legal residents. These crimes do not even include diseases and pandemics illegal immigrants are introducing to America’s law abiding population all justified in name of amnesty.
Explaining not complaining, Texas Drifter during one part of my life spent fours years as legally indigent American; which is one hundred eighty degrees different from professional public subsidy addicts also called welfare recipients. One lesson learned that most governments agencies and some churches are little more than pimps for the poor.
Americans like many conservative talks show celebrities who believe America provides great health care for indigents might be surprised when their judgment day personal appointment arrives.
Standard procedure care for most indigents in America is “stabilize, then dismiss so they can go die somewhere else”. Health care for the professional poor is “pad the bill with unnecessary tests and procedures” to allow us to become wealthy on money stolen from taxpayers.
Ironic justice is now most Americans will get to experience indigent health care standards through Obama Care. Translation – “stabilize; dismiss to go die somewhere else”.
Perhaps that is why some pro lifers are not denouncing Obama Care as more deaths means, more money from more bequests and donations from more and more funerals. Now those victimized by Obama Care will include: not yet born, those born premature, to defective to treat children, permanently disabled, those with pre-existing conditions, the severely injured, and the elderly.
Brutal fact of life, Obama Care tolerated by some pro lifers only exists to provide health care to those in good health who do not need health care. TRUE not FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: Rare “sneak preview” Texas Drifter’s next writing exercise Library Entry # 630 “America’s Pop Culture Satin’s Sirens”.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Are pro lifers hypocrites, who protest killing of yet unborn who do not protest Obama Care killing: the already born like premature children, sick and elderly? Murdering how, denying services with higher premiums, higher deductibles, larger co-payments, and denying selected services for those with “not viable” futures.
Could partial answer to some pro lifers being hypocrites include pro lifers who trade their responsibilities of ministering to troubled souls for more government legislation and laws?
Definition of hypocrite is one who expresses virtues or qualities one does not have or possess. Example of hypocrites include Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats serving as Unites States Republican Senate and House leaders, their staff, consultants, and allies.
Some have suggested that there are too many cases of killing unborn because there are too many ministers and preachers setting on their getting fatter by day backsides; while counting their congregations tithing’s; as opposed to spending time ministering to those who could benefit from moral teachings to save yet born.
Seems too many self appointed “religious leaders” have forgotten that where the heart goes the body follows; while unmanaged thoughts tend to lead body towards spontaneous lusts.
Then again, ministering to confused or needy might deprive them of time to raise adequate donations; to build idols to show Heaven what an exalted worshipers they have become.
Texas Drifter could use reader’s help in finding passage about the sinner needing to pay commissions to self appointed emissary (insert minister or pastor’s name) acting as “middle man” to receive Salvation offered by Heaven’s Son.
Refresher excerpt notes from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 085 “America’s First Tradition” published 10-16-08.
Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."
Translation depending on government legislation to protect not yet born is fool’s path. States Rights like those is Texas may “regulate” behavior; changing moral objectives requires teachings about right and wrong not warnings about what is legal and illegal. If relying on legislation to change personal conduct works so well; guess there have become negligible alcohol related deaths on American highways?
Texas Drifter also needs reader to help me locate passage about passing responsibilities to help truly poor on to government. Seems estimated seventeen trillion dollars to win “war on poverty” is about what represents America’s national debt. Seems there are more perpetual professional poor than when war on poverty began.
With Obama Care on America’s horizon and “war on poverty” and legislation against drunk drivers being so unsuccessful; how many yet born, premature born, already born children, plus sick and elderly will pro lifer hypocrites be sending to their deaths by depending on government policies to replace ministering to confused, scared, tired, truly and other needy?
Another issue involves pro lifer hypocrites supporting porous borders, which allows law breakers called illegal immigrants to enter America; and commit atrocities against American citizens and legal residents. These crimes do not even include diseases and pandemics illegal immigrants are introducing to America’s law abiding population all justified in name of amnesty.
Explaining not complaining, Texas Drifter during one part of my life spent fours years as legally indigent American; which is one hundred eighty degrees different from professional public subsidy addicts also called welfare recipients. One lesson learned that most governments agencies and some churches are little more than pimps for the poor.
Americans like many conservative talks show celebrities who believe America provides great health care for indigents might be surprised when their judgment day personal appointment arrives.
Standard procedure care for most indigents in America is “stabilize, then dismiss so they can go die somewhere else”. Health care for the professional poor is “pad the bill with unnecessary tests and procedures” to allow us to become wealthy on money stolen from taxpayers.
Ironic justice is now most Americans will get to experience indigent health care standards through Obama Care. Translation – “stabilize; dismiss to go die somewhere else”.
Perhaps that is why some pro lifers are not denouncing Obama Care as more deaths means, more money from more bequests and donations from more and more funerals. Now those victimized by Obama Care will include: not yet born, those born premature, to defective to treat children, permanently disabled, those with pre-existing conditions, the severely injured, and the elderly.
Brutal fact of life, Obama Care tolerated by some pro lifers only exists to provide health care to those in good health who do not need health care. TRUE not FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: Rare “sneak preview” Texas Drifter’s next writing exercise Library Entry # 630 “America’s Pop Culture Satin’s Sirens”.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)