Texas Drifter: Compassion Now A Bad Word?

Library Entry # 622

Marshall’s Law Dateline – First propaganda technique used by evil among us in U.S. is diluting then changing meanings of often used words to promote their evil ways. Restating ignored obvious, some words can have different meanings to different people.

Two examples, first case involves teenage boy telling his young girlfriend: “I love you”. Translation “because when you are high you are promiscuous and believe my lies.” What young intoxicated girl hears: He loves me because of my fabulous body and great personality.”

Second example what Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites mean when they use “contemporary word” compassion to conservatives and what conservatives think traditional word compassion means. Can argument be made that most conservatives are like naïve drunk teenage girls who like being abused by Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites with morals of teenage boys full of lust?

Perhaps few definitions will help reader better understand above question? Definition of bad is; if you my reader do not know definition of bad? Reader must have gone to public school where bad is good and good is bad. Suggestion, do not waste your time reading this writing exercise.

Conservative traditional definition of compassion is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with desire to alleviate their distress.

Contemporary Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ definition of compassion is possessing imaginary guilt for others’ distress, together with desire not to be blamed by liberals for “not caring” by not stealing enough other peoples’ money through excessive taxes to reward lazy public subsidy welfare addicts; professional poor also called government plantation slaves.

Some examples of Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ contemporary word compassion benefits:
1. Marxist-fascists and their insatiable lust for social, economic, and political power;
2. Corporate fascists and their insatiable lust for greed funded though special government regulations and funding deals;
3. Others’ greed and selfishness like professional welfare addicts, some public unions, and illegal immigrants;
4. Ignorant and uneducated;
5. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites economic and political power;
6. Others reader can list.

Consequences of these Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites propaganda will be:
1. government plantation slaves who are mostly useless in that they have to steal others’ property to survive;
2. Marxist-fascist regulations and policies which are not only destructive to America’s traditions, values, and principles; but also self destructive to bad guys themselves;
3. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ polices and political deeds which will also be self destructive for Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites who future historians will be described, in America, with as much animosity as Judas is describes among Christians;
4. Near fatal collateral damage to America’s traditions, values, principles, and constitutional ethical capitalist republic.

To re-emphasize earlier point, seems sad that Obama Republicans also known as Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites have turned compassion a word describing a once noble trait into an evil concept which benefits evil among us in U.S.

Much like Progressive Liberal Democrats have turned word “love” into synonym for promiscuous. Or conservatives have cheapened by over use concept “great American”. Two points, “great Americans” do not have to keep reminding others they are great Americans. Reducing concept “great American” to insignificant greeting is disrespectful to truly “Great Americans”. TRUE or FALSE

Another question: capitalism without integrity is unethical and violates “Thou shall Not Steal” Commandment. Translation ethical capitalism produces most assets available for compassion by traditional definition. While unethical capitalism and or corporate fascism are based on stealing and only produce unholy compassion based on contemporary definition.

This concept is ignored by most free market advocates who believe that it is alright to steal from others with unethical capitalism or corporate fascism; and that governments should not be able to tax their ill-gotten gains. TRUE or FALSE

First Bonus question – Is compassion now a bad word? Answer - yes when it is used with contemporary meaning by Marxist-fascists, Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites, and their allies. TRUE or FALSE.

Extra Three Bonus Point question: The first rule of Marxist- Fascists like Obama and his inner circle is to carry out purges of all 1) political opponents called “political or ideological traitors”, including 2) imaginary “scapegoats” like conservatives and Tea Party Members at all costs using any purely wicked tactic necessary. TRUE or FALSE – one point

Why, Obamaization of all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies only tolerates those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: like Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. TRUE or FALSE – second point

Texas Drifter hopes that I am around long enough to hear reported that Obamaization has started “eating their own” like Biden, Reid, and Clintons. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.

Have no fear my reader, Conservative celebrities like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Beck, plus others reader can list can, to use their vanities to talk enough compassionate words, to cause Marxist-fascists to become sensitive caring political leaders. Doubt this observation reader can channel Trotsky’s atheist Marxist spirit to make your self feel better. TRUE or FALSE – third point

Again Texas Drifter is not advocating non-self defense violence; just asking reader to consider that just talking should not be only option left on metaphorical table. TRUE not FALSE