Library Entry # 628
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Boehner’s plans for “legalization” for illegal immigrants seems to be fascist treason. Those supporting Boehner’s fascist treason include greedy internationalist America last unethical capitalists who have evolved into corporate fascists.
Simple analysis suggests Boehner’s legalization is prelude to activist federal courts providing amnesty for illegal immigrants which benefits America’s constitutional republic how? Answer zero benefits with only costs to American people.
Boehner’s legalization for illegals benefits who? Short list includes:
1. Corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats with mega profits from exploited Americans and illegals cheap labor costs.
2. More votes for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats financing larger and larger bankrupting federal budgets for ever growing socialist: public subsidy addicts, medical costs, social services, more criminal justice services, public health pandemics brought into America by illegal immigrants through not secure borders; others reader can list.
3. Rewards criminal conduct and punishes American citizens and legal immigrants who “play by the rules”.
4. Race and ethnic haters have more reasons to hate by blaming problems caused by amnesty for twenty million plus illegal immigrants on Anglos and other Americans with middle class attitudes.
5. More dues paying members for public and private sector unions.
6. Others reader can list.
Moving on to Republican beneficiaries from Boehner’s legalization of treason supported by greedy internationalist America last corporate fascist Obama Republicans.
Definition of greedy is excessive or reprehensible lust for material objects like money.
Patriots are citizens who love, honor, cherish, and defend their country; while internationalists generally Marxist or fascist place their country’s interest above no other nation. Hence prefix “inter” means among equals not above other components.
Some preliminary questions:
1. Does reader plan their personal and or family financial budgets and personal economies on their neighbors’ financial budgets and economies?
2. Do American states like Texas and other States reader can cite, base their state budgets and state economies on other states budgets and economies?
If answers to above questions one and two are no; why is it not profoundly stupid for Americans’ America to intertwine America’s budget and economy with other nations budgets and economies? It seems a sure way to destroy Heaven’s favorite republic.
Observation question, are internationalist economics by Americans, not only unpatriotic but also serious threat to America’s national security and domestic tranquility?
Answer may be brutal fact if internationalists motivated by greed seek to become “trading partners” with America’s sworn adversaries and sworn enemies? Sworn adversaries like Mexico, and sworn enemies like China, plus many Middle East nations and other nations which reader can list.
Question, are internationalists Achilles heels, their contempt for all things patriotic; which blinds internationalists to premise that national security requires rewarding international allies with economic activities, and not rewarding sworn adversaries and or sworn enemies with economic trade? TRUE or FALSE
Readers offended by previous real world observations, need only offer empirical evidence which proves Texas Drifter’s non-prejudicial observations are not accurate. TRUE or FALSE
Clues before answering preceding question include excerpts from.
Texas Drifter: NSJA Part I | All Right Magazine Published By: Texas Drifter on April 21, 2012. It is also true that America's baby boomer presidents Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have unintentionally or ...
Texas Drifter: NSJA Part II | All Right Magazine Published By: Texas Drifter on April 21, 2012. Based on George Washington's comments during his Farewell Address, “There can be no greater error than to ...
Two in one bonus question – If reader does not have courage to denounce evil; what value are you to struggle for good? Internationalists evolve for unethical capitalists to corporate fascists. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question two: List ten corporate fascist Republican ruling elite establishment aristocrats who have evolved from being unethical capitalists into corporate fascists.
Clues most are Obama Republican elected officials (like Boehner), their staff members, their financial supporters (like Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce) and their public endorsers like Wall Street Journal and often Fox News. Another good place to start finding answers are those publicly and covertly supporting Boehner’s fascist treason legalization for illegal immigrants.
Translation questions: Boehner eventually accepts employment as lobbyist to help America’s corporate fascists destroy Heaven’s favorite due process republic?
Will their ever be a day in America when America’s patriots will conduct Nuremberg type trials for likes of Boehner; Boehner’s staff; plus those corporate fascists who financed and supported Boehner’s fascist treasons with propaganda themes like legalization for illegal immigrants?
Is it not also possible the guilty among us like Boehner and his gang of what ever word reader chooses; could also face domestic war crimes trials for all there other atrocities against those they pledged to serve while running for their elected or appointed offices?
Going step further, list of potential indictments has not even considered violations by Boehner and his allies’ oaths to uphold, protect, and defend. TRUE or FALSE
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Monday, January 27, 2014
Texas Drifter: State of Union One Word Can Save America
Library Entry # 627
Marshall’s Law Dateline – American patriots have three State of Unions in 2014 to consider: Obama’s; Obama Republicans; Texas Drifter’s which identifies the one word that restores America to being Heaven’s favorite constitutional ethical capitalist republic.
Definition of coalition is temporary alliance of different parties, organizations, or persons for joint mutually beneficial actions.
Marshall’s Law – coalitions survive and become successful by coalition members respecting similarities; tolerating differences.
Three primary sides in contemporary American political environment:
1. right;
2. left;
3. not involved who do not care, also called apathetic.
Distinctions between three sides:
Number three “apathetic” are those who could care less about apolitical influences that they perceive as not affecting their selfish recreational activities. Reader can list.
Number two “left’ are obvious world owes us because we are special or world owes us because we are perpetual victims like America last advocates including but not limited to: Marxist-fascists Progressive Liberal Democrats; corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats also called Obama Republicans; some public sector unions; professional public subsidy addicts; most Hollywood celebrities; heterophobic haters; racial and ethnic haters; reader can add to list.
Number three “right” should also be obvious: supporters and defenders of America’s traditions, values and principles like inalienable rights but not limited to: Judeo-Christians; conservatives; constitutionalists; ethical capitalists; libertarians; Reagan Democrats; other patriots reader can list.
Repetition is good teaching tools. Recall Marshall’s Law – coalitions survive and become successful by coalition members respecting similarities; tolerating differences.
Side note lesson, first goal is to win war or cause of action; after successfully achieving goal, then coalition members can deal with cult leaders and their cults which threaten right’s primary principles. Never forget, replacing left wing dictator with right ring cult leader is not acceptable exchange.
Some strategies for “right” coalition:
1. Win primaries to provide right side with opportunity to elect acceptable local, state, and federal candidates.
2. Change constitution as suggested by some conservative celebrities using Article V to allow States to exercise their constitution authorized powers. Few suggestions include following:
A) Constitutional Amendment prohibiting primary / single pay health care in America. This “pocketbook” issue should be easy to sell to citizens; plus will also “kill” phase two of Obama Care.
B) Amend U.S. Amendment XVII to U.S. Senators being chosen by States Legislatures (like original) to “cripple” corporate fascist lobby efforts. Could help retire Senators like Cornyn; bad enough Cornyn violates oath to uphold, protect, and defend to Heaven and American people. Still worse than that is Cornyn breaking promises to citizens of Texas; readers wanting to learn more about Cornyn, need only review other Texas Drifter writing exercises.
C) Limit terms of all federal judges (District, Appellate; Supreme Court, other special positions) to combined total of fifteen years.
Above State sponsored amendments should be easy to market, and provide return to traditional American values.
3. Shadow warriors gather intelligence to show American public true nature of many of their elected officials and governing power brokers. Such information made public should also get “left” allies fighting among themselves which is consistent with Marshall’s “up close and personal” strategy. Reader can reference for more ideas: Texas Drifter: Shadow Warriors Tie breakers?” published November 2013 by All Right Magazine or Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library
4. Use “right” House, senate, and Executive branches of federal government to defund only federal agencies engaging in pro Marxist or pro corporate fascist policies and other unconstitutional actions. Bureaucrats are “useless” and impotent without their “pay checks”.
Other abuses of concern beside EPA; IRS; NSA; include National Defense Authorization Act which despite indirect support from closet Obama Republican Senator Cornyn needs to consider having “special provisions” limited to international duties.
5. Replace “leftist” ideologue agency administrators, staff and military officers with oath honoring professionals, not affirmative action incompetents.
6. Replace Marxist economic policies and economies and corporate fascist economic policies and economies; with natural law economics in ethical capitalist economies. Note ethical capitalist economies are fueled by minimum regulations and minimum fair taxes which will eventually “detoxify” public subsidy addicts and their destructive to both them and America’s welfare state culture.
7. Rebuild America’s manufacturing base with NSJA (National Security Jobs Act) and limiting international markets to good neighbors and allies. Remember national security starts with secure border and selective legal immigration. Reader can reference more about NSJA:
A) Texas Drifter: NSJA Part I | All Right Magazine
www.allrightmagazine.com/uncategorized/texas-drifter-nsja-part-i-15846/
Published By: Texas Drifter on April 21, 2012. It is also true that America's baby boomer presidents Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have unintentionally or ...
B) Texas Drifter: NSJA Part II | All Right Magazine
www.allrightmagazine.com/foreign.../texas-drifter-nsja-part-ii-15848/
Published By: Texas Drifter on April 21, 2012. Based on George Washington's comments during his Farewell Address, “There can be no greater error than to ...
8. Civil rights in America should be based on President Jackson’s “equality without privilege”. No more special benefits for perpetual greedy like: aristocrats; professional poor; and over paid under qualified public bureaucrats; race, ethnic, gender haters. Reader can add others to their new list of “world owes you nothing; because you are only special in you spoiled selfish mind.”
9. Re-establish “middle class attitudes” among all economic classes from very wealthiest to transitory poor; plus both public and private sectors.
10. Leave all options on table, Second Amendment guarantees that unconstitutional non-self defense violence by any government domestic or foreign which threaten inalienable rights of American citizens; shall be judged by due process legal system not managed by Marxist tyrants; corporate fascist tyrants; theological fascists like Islamic terrorists; or any others engaged in threatening conduct deserving self defense.
Reader doubts this observation; reader can reference Ten Commandments which distinguishes killing and murder; Act of Abjuration 1581; along with Declaration of Independence. All three reaffirm American citizens’ right to self defense from tyrants.
Back to “right” coalition, hopefully above ten strategies will be enough similarities; with tolerated differences being worked out by future American patriotic generations. What say you my reader? TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Colonel Travis and Colonel Bowie died “standing heel and toe” metaphorically behind crumbling walls of old church known as Alamo. Reader does not know of their dislikes for each other; can do their own research so reader will remember lesson longer.
Clue question is not how much reader dislikes coalition member; question is does reader honor their oath or love America; more than reader dislikes offensive coalition member?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – American patriots have three State of Unions in 2014 to consider: Obama’s; Obama Republicans; Texas Drifter’s which identifies the one word that restores America to being Heaven’s favorite constitutional ethical capitalist republic.
Definition of coalition is temporary alliance of different parties, organizations, or persons for joint mutually beneficial actions.
Marshall’s Law – coalitions survive and become successful by coalition members respecting similarities; tolerating differences.
Three primary sides in contemporary American political environment:
1. right;
2. left;
3. not involved who do not care, also called apathetic.
Distinctions between three sides:
Number three “apathetic” are those who could care less about apolitical influences that they perceive as not affecting their selfish recreational activities. Reader can list.
Number two “left’ are obvious world owes us because we are special or world owes us because we are perpetual victims like America last advocates including but not limited to: Marxist-fascists Progressive Liberal Democrats; corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats also called Obama Republicans; some public sector unions; professional public subsidy addicts; most Hollywood celebrities; heterophobic haters; racial and ethnic haters; reader can add to list.
Number three “right” should also be obvious: supporters and defenders of America’s traditions, values and principles like inalienable rights but not limited to: Judeo-Christians; conservatives; constitutionalists; ethical capitalists; libertarians; Reagan Democrats; other patriots reader can list.
Repetition is good teaching tools. Recall Marshall’s Law – coalitions survive and become successful by coalition members respecting similarities; tolerating differences.
Side note lesson, first goal is to win war or cause of action; after successfully achieving goal, then coalition members can deal with cult leaders and their cults which threaten right’s primary principles. Never forget, replacing left wing dictator with right ring cult leader is not acceptable exchange.
Some strategies for “right” coalition:
1. Win primaries to provide right side with opportunity to elect acceptable local, state, and federal candidates.
2. Change constitution as suggested by some conservative celebrities using Article V to allow States to exercise their constitution authorized powers. Few suggestions include following:
A) Constitutional Amendment prohibiting primary / single pay health care in America. This “pocketbook” issue should be easy to sell to citizens; plus will also “kill” phase two of Obama Care.
B) Amend U.S. Amendment XVII to U.S. Senators being chosen by States Legislatures (like original) to “cripple” corporate fascist lobby efforts. Could help retire Senators like Cornyn; bad enough Cornyn violates oath to uphold, protect, and defend to Heaven and American people. Still worse than that is Cornyn breaking promises to citizens of Texas; readers wanting to learn more about Cornyn, need only review other Texas Drifter writing exercises.
C) Limit terms of all federal judges (District, Appellate; Supreme Court, other special positions) to combined total of fifteen years.
Above State sponsored amendments should be easy to market, and provide return to traditional American values.
3. Shadow warriors gather intelligence to show American public true nature of many of their elected officials and governing power brokers. Such information made public should also get “left” allies fighting among themselves which is consistent with Marshall’s “up close and personal” strategy. Reader can reference for more ideas: Texas Drifter: Shadow Warriors Tie breakers?” published November 2013 by All Right Magazine or Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library
4. Use “right” House, senate, and Executive branches of federal government to defund only federal agencies engaging in pro Marxist or pro corporate fascist policies and other unconstitutional actions. Bureaucrats are “useless” and impotent without their “pay checks”.
Other abuses of concern beside EPA; IRS; NSA; include National Defense Authorization Act which despite indirect support from closet Obama Republican Senator Cornyn needs to consider having “special provisions” limited to international duties.
5. Replace “leftist” ideologue agency administrators, staff and military officers with oath honoring professionals, not affirmative action incompetents.
6. Replace Marxist economic policies and economies and corporate fascist economic policies and economies; with natural law economics in ethical capitalist economies. Note ethical capitalist economies are fueled by minimum regulations and minimum fair taxes which will eventually “detoxify” public subsidy addicts and their destructive to both them and America’s welfare state culture.
7. Rebuild America’s manufacturing base with NSJA (National Security Jobs Act) and limiting international markets to good neighbors and allies. Remember national security starts with secure border and selective legal immigration. Reader can reference more about NSJA:
A) Texas Drifter: NSJA Part I | All Right Magazine
www.allrightmagazine.com/uncategorized/texas-drifter-nsja-part-i-15846/
Published By: Texas Drifter on April 21, 2012. It is also true that America's baby boomer presidents Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have unintentionally or ...
B) Texas Drifter: NSJA Part II | All Right Magazine
www.allrightmagazine.com/foreign.../texas-drifter-nsja-part-ii-15848/
Published By: Texas Drifter on April 21, 2012. Based on George Washington's comments during his Farewell Address, “There can be no greater error than to ...
8. Civil rights in America should be based on President Jackson’s “equality without privilege”. No more special benefits for perpetual greedy like: aristocrats; professional poor; and over paid under qualified public bureaucrats; race, ethnic, gender haters. Reader can add others to their new list of “world owes you nothing; because you are only special in you spoiled selfish mind.”
9. Re-establish “middle class attitudes” among all economic classes from very wealthiest to transitory poor; plus both public and private sectors.
10. Leave all options on table, Second Amendment guarantees that unconstitutional non-self defense violence by any government domestic or foreign which threaten inalienable rights of American citizens; shall be judged by due process legal system not managed by Marxist tyrants; corporate fascist tyrants; theological fascists like Islamic terrorists; or any others engaged in threatening conduct deserving self defense.
Reader doubts this observation; reader can reference Ten Commandments which distinguishes killing and murder; Act of Abjuration 1581; along with Declaration of Independence. All three reaffirm American citizens’ right to self defense from tyrants.
Back to “right” coalition, hopefully above ten strategies will be enough similarities; with tolerated differences being worked out by future American patriotic generations. What say you my reader? TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Colonel Travis and Colonel Bowie died “standing heel and toe” metaphorically behind crumbling walls of old church known as Alamo. Reader does not know of their dislikes for each other; can do their own research so reader will remember lesson longer.
Clue question is not how much reader dislikes coalition member; question is does reader honor their oath or love America; more than reader dislikes offensive coalition member?
Friday, January 24, 2014
Texas Drifter: Ten Bad Words to Describe Evil Politicians
Library Entry # 626
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Will FCC eventually ban ten bad words in America used to describe evil politicians and their evil allies? Precedent exist, did FCC set precedent by banning “seven” really profane words?
Definition of evil is sinful, wicked, or morally reprehensible.
Definitions for concepts like evil politicians and evil allies; reader cannot discern their meanings? Perhaps reader should not waste their time reading this Texas Drifter writing exercise?
There are two types of politicians and their allies:
1. Good politicians who are believers in America’s traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights; who have integrity with courage to honor their oaths to uphold, protect and defend to Heaven and the American people.
2. Bad politicians and their allies who are not believers or just pretend to be believers in America’s traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights; who lack integrity and are motivated by cowardice to violate their oaths to uphold, protect and defend to Heaven and the American people.
Ten bad words in America which describe evil politicians and their evil allies:
1. Hater/s – racist or ethnic haters; hates America’s traditions, values, principles like inalienable rights represented by citizens like: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, those with middle class attitudes, and other patriots reader can list; heterophobes and their supporters; Yankee Republican scalawags who “look down” on Southerners; others reader can list.
2. Luster – one motivated by rabid animal like desires for sex thrills, greed of property, or lust for political power;
3. Vainer (vainers plural of vainer) – those who believe world owes them privileged lives because they are special self appointed royalty; or those who believe world owes them special privileges like affirmative action because they are perpetual victims. Side question, how large a step for those with “addictive personalities” to make transition from being addicted to drug like alcohol to being addicted to their vanities? Also could one way to identify these vanity addicts, be by how often they use personal pronouns like me, myself, I, my, mine, and others reader can list. Could this observation question be applied to an Obama or a Beck? What would be advantages between Stalin type cult and Robespierre type cult?
4. Robber – lazy person who would rather steal others properties than earn their own;
5. Liar – one stating falsehoods; making false statements like against their neighbor/s for Obama's justice department; breaking promises like oaths;
6. Pretender – faker or one who deceives to obtain selfish personal objectives, selfish social or selfish political goals. Seems pretenders can be identified by other Bad word characteristics in American politics like: hater, luster, vainer, robber, liar, coveter, hurter, excuser, purger, or words reader can add.
7. Coveter one who obsesses or is jealous over another’s love/s, properties, or successes. Did not one of Ten Commandments delivered by Moses include not coveting?
8. Hurter/s – one who gets satisfaction from inflicting pain on others? Believe synonym is sadist? Is person who inflicts pain on millions like Marxist-fascist by way of Obama Care a mass hurter, or genocidal sadist?
9. Excuser – one who is responsible for their actions, but never seems to know what was happening when things were going wrong, or people were being abused.
10. Purger – one who uses purges to get rid of undesirable persons like excrement.
11. Reader can add to list.
Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form
Instructions: answer yes or no plus cite brief reason/s
Sample Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form
Name: Obama
1. Hater – yes – racist and hates those defending America’s traditions, values, and principles
2. Luster – yes – motivated by greed and lust for power
3. Vainer – yes – one clue is excessive use of personal pronouns
4. Robber – yes – public devotion to Marxist-fascist ideologies
5. Liar – yes- to many examples to list
6. Pretender – yes – obvious personal conduct
7. Coveter – yes – attitude of jealous dislikes of Tea Party Members
8. Hurter – yes – Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Obama Care, , EPA destroying private sector jobs, preceding is brief list
9. Excuser – yes – most quoted line “ did not know”
10. Purger – yes – IRS; Justice Department; and purges of America’s top military officers
11. Reader might add to list
Conclusion: Seems to be a perfect score for Obama.
Reader might like to show bi-partisanship by using “Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form” for Republican Senators McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, and Republican House Members Boehner, and Ryan; plus private sector "conservatives" like Rove and Beck. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question: FCC like tyrant thugs and goons will eventually ban ten bad words in America to describe evil politicians and their evil allies. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Will FCC eventually ban ten bad words in America used to describe evil politicians and their evil allies? Precedent exist, did FCC set precedent by banning “seven” really profane words?
Definition of evil is sinful, wicked, or morally reprehensible.
Definitions for concepts like evil politicians and evil allies; reader cannot discern their meanings? Perhaps reader should not waste their time reading this Texas Drifter writing exercise?
There are two types of politicians and their allies:
1. Good politicians who are believers in America’s traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights; who have integrity with courage to honor their oaths to uphold, protect and defend to Heaven and the American people.
2. Bad politicians and their allies who are not believers or just pretend to be believers in America’s traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights; who lack integrity and are motivated by cowardice to violate their oaths to uphold, protect and defend to Heaven and the American people.
Ten bad words in America which describe evil politicians and their evil allies:
1. Hater/s – racist or ethnic haters; hates America’s traditions, values, principles like inalienable rights represented by citizens like: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, those with middle class attitudes, and other patriots reader can list; heterophobes and their supporters; Yankee Republican scalawags who “look down” on Southerners; others reader can list.
2. Luster – one motivated by rabid animal like desires for sex thrills, greed of property, or lust for political power;
3. Vainer (vainers plural of vainer) – those who believe world owes them privileged lives because they are special self appointed royalty; or those who believe world owes them special privileges like affirmative action because they are perpetual victims. Side question, how large a step for those with “addictive personalities” to make transition from being addicted to drug like alcohol to being addicted to their vanities? Also could one way to identify these vanity addicts, be by how often they use personal pronouns like me, myself, I, my, mine, and others reader can list. Could this observation question be applied to an Obama or a Beck? What would be advantages between Stalin type cult and Robespierre type cult?
4. Robber – lazy person who would rather steal others properties than earn their own;
5. Liar – one stating falsehoods; making false statements like against their neighbor/s for Obama's justice department; breaking promises like oaths;
6. Pretender – faker or one who deceives to obtain selfish personal objectives, selfish social or selfish political goals. Seems pretenders can be identified by other Bad word characteristics in American politics like: hater, luster, vainer, robber, liar, coveter, hurter, excuser, purger, or words reader can add.
7. Coveter one who obsesses or is jealous over another’s love/s, properties, or successes. Did not one of Ten Commandments delivered by Moses include not coveting?
8. Hurter/s – one who gets satisfaction from inflicting pain on others? Believe synonym is sadist? Is person who inflicts pain on millions like Marxist-fascist by way of Obama Care a mass hurter, or genocidal sadist?
9. Excuser – one who is responsible for their actions, but never seems to know what was happening when things were going wrong, or people were being abused.
10. Purger – one who uses purges to get rid of undesirable persons like excrement.
11. Reader can add to list.
Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form
Instructions: answer yes or no plus cite brief reason/s
Sample Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form
Name: Obama
1. Hater – yes – racist and hates those defending America’s traditions, values, and principles
2. Luster – yes – motivated by greed and lust for power
3. Vainer – yes – one clue is excessive use of personal pronouns
4. Robber – yes – public devotion to Marxist-fascist ideologies
5. Liar – yes- to many examples to list
6. Pretender – yes – obvious personal conduct
7. Coveter – yes – attitude of jealous dislikes of Tea Party Members
8. Hurter – yes – Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Obama Care, , EPA destroying private sector jobs, preceding is brief list
9. Excuser – yes – most quoted line “ did not know”
10. Purger – yes – IRS; Justice Department; and purges of America’s top military officers
11. Reader might add to list
Conclusion: Seems to be a perfect score for Obama.
Reader might like to show bi-partisanship by using “Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form” for Republican Senators McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, and Republican House Members Boehner, and Ryan; plus private sector "conservatives" like Rove and Beck. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question: FCC like tyrant thugs and goons will eventually ban ten bad words in America to describe evil politicians and their evil allies. TRUE or FALSE
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Texas Drifter: Reasons to Distrust Governments?
Library Entry # 625
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Americans do not trust governments in general and NSA in particular, because governments and NSA do not trust Americans.
Definition of reasons - thoughts resulting from thinking in logical or rational manners extinct from emotions.
Definition of distrust - feeling that someone or something is dishonest or unreliable.
Definition of “Obama Republican” is member of Republican Party usually corporate fascist or Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrat lacking middle class attitudes, who is ally of Obama Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Few synonyms for Obama Republicans include: hypocrites; traitors, Judas club boys; evil among us in U.S.; others reader can add to list.
How to identify Obama Republicans, who are what they are:
Republican Senators (reader can reference):
1. Texas Drifter: Guide To Republican Partisan Adulterers and Republican Patriots - www.allrightmagazine.com published June 18, 2013
2. Texas Drifter: Senator Cornyn A Greek Tragedy?| All Right Magazine -
www.allrightmagazine.com September 25, 2013 ...Question is Cornyn’s story comparable to Greek tragedy?
3. Texas Drifter: Are Moderate Republicans America’s Lepers?
www.allrightmagazine.com Nov 20, 2013
Republican House Members: simple, identify Speaker Boehner’s and Ryan’s allies
Other Obama Republican allies and collaborators include consultants and lobbyists that reader can list starting with Rove and Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce.
Reasons why honorable Americans like: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats; plus others reader can list; may choose to identify Obama Republicans:
1. to not have to associate with
2. to not vote for
3. to not contribute to
4. to not volunteer for
5. to not do business with
6. to not socialize with
7. to not feel guilty about not providing “aid and comfort to” during Obama’s purge “number two” especially since Obama Republicans led Obama’s purge “number one” against honorable Americans and patriots
8. reader can add to list
Distrust begets distrust – perhaps Obama Republicans do not trust America’s honorable Americans and patriots; because Obama Republicans like McConnell and Boehner know they have broken campaign promises to their conservative base.
Plus McConnell and Boehner along with other Obama Republicans know they have violated their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend to both Heaven and honorable Americans and patriots?
Based on Obama Republicans’ both dishonest and unreliable integrities; why would they trust American citizens they betrayed like Judas betrayed Heaven’s Son? Perhaps evil among us in U.S. distrusts conservative types is because evil among us in U.S. are not trustworthy and fear getting caught?
If first wages of sins by governments in U.S. can be loss of trust by their employers; believe concept is known by “government by the people”. What could additional wages of sins be by bureaucrats trying not be caught so as to avoid their just punishments? Reader can speculate on that answer.
America’s Bill of Rights, do not define immunity for those who enact random interpretations which violate due process laws of America’s land. Seems those guilty could be bureaucrats; who eventually have unpleasant experiences as public sector law breakers. TRUE or FALSE
Clue: That one “law of land is as follows: The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Are following NSA definitions?
1. “Pretext” another word for lie or falsehood
2. “Intel Leverage” is blackmail or extortion
3. Data base mining procedures are illegal wiretaps which provide “tips” to be used as “leads” to get “sanitized warrants” to be used as evidence in “due process” trials guided by “prosecutorial misconduct” for the security of Americans too stupid to understand that we (NSA) know what is best for them.
How long before NSA uses above definitions in EX PARTE trials to convict and sentence Americans to “special prisons” or national security termination practices? Before reader answers question; ask to see cost-benefit ratios for NSA operations. Translations – how many terrorist operations has NSA prevented? Then divide that number into NSA total budget expenditures. Then ask how many Americans Fourth Amendment Rights has NSA violated?
Answer should be this many Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights violated to disrupt this many terrorist operations for this many tax payer dollars. Should produce cost benefit ratio number.
More like truth, only way NSA can reduce their cost benefit ratio is by expanding their data base mining to provide scapegoats for Obama’s three purges: “number one”, “number two”, “number three”.
Background reference of Law.Com for EX PARTE (ex par-tay, but popularly, ex party) adj. Latin meaning "for one party," referring to motions, hearings or orders granted on the request of and for the benefit of one party only. This is an exception to the basic rule of court procedure that both parties must be present at any argument before a judge, and to the otherwise strict rule that an attorney may not notify a judge without previously notifying the opposition. Ex parte matters are usually temporary orders (like a restraining order or temporary custody) pending a formal hearing or an emergency request for a continuance. Most jurisdictions require at least a diligent attempt to contact the other party's lawyer of the time and place of any ex parte hearing.
Bonus question: Americans do not trust governments in general and NSA in particular, because governments and NSA do not trust Americans. What say you my reader, TRUE or TRUE.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Americans do not trust governments in general and NSA in particular, because governments and NSA do not trust Americans.
Definition of reasons - thoughts resulting from thinking in logical or rational manners extinct from emotions.
Definition of distrust - feeling that someone or something is dishonest or unreliable.
Definition of “Obama Republican” is member of Republican Party usually corporate fascist or Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrat lacking middle class attitudes, who is ally of Obama Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Few synonyms for Obama Republicans include: hypocrites; traitors, Judas club boys; evil among us in U.S.; others reader can add to list.
How to identify Obama Republicans, who are what they are:
Republican Senators (reader can reference):
1. Texas Drifter: Guide To Republican Partisan Adulterers and Republican Patriots - www.allrightmagazine.com published June 18, 2013
2. Texas Drifter: Senator Cornyn A Greek Tragedy?| All Right Magazine -
www.allrightmagazine.com September 25, 2013 ...Question is Cornyn’s story comparable to Greek tragedy?
3. Texas Drifter: Are Moderate Republicans America’s Lepers?
www.allrightmagazine.com Nov 20, 2013
Republican House Members: simple, identify Speaker Boehner’s and Ryan’s allies
Other Obama Republican allies and collaborators include consultants and lobbyists that reader can list starting with Rove and Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce.
Reasons why honorable Americans like: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats; plus others reader can list; may choose to identify Obama Republicans:
1. to not have to associate with
2. to not vote for
3. to not contribute to
4. to not volunteer for
5. to not do business with
6. to not socialize with
7. to not feel guilty about not providing “aid and comfort to” during Obama’s purge “number two” especially since Obama Republicans led Obama’s purge “number one” against honorable Americans and patriots
8. reader can add to list
Distrust begets distrust – perhaps Obama Republicans do not trust America’s honorable Americans and patriots; because Obama Republicans like McConnell and Boehner know they have broken campaign promises to their conservative base.
Plus McConnell and Boehner along with other Obama Republicans know they have violated their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend to both Heaven and honorable Americans and patriots?
Based on Obama Republicans’ both dishonest and unreliable integrities; why would they trust American citizens they betrayed like Judas betrayed Heaven’s Son? Perhaps evil among us in U.S. distrusts conservative types is because evil among us in U.S. are not trustworthy and fear getting caught?
If first wages of sins by governments in U.S. can be loss of trust by their employers; believe concept is known by “government by the people”. What could additional wages of sins be by bureaucrats trying not be caught so as to avoid their just punishments? Reader can speculate on that answer.
America’s Bill of Rights, do not define immunity for those who enact random interpretations which violate due process laws of America’s land. Seems those guilty could be bureaucrats; who eventually have unpleasant experiences as public sector law breakers. TRUE or FALSE
Clue: That one “law of land is as follows: The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Are following NSA definitions?
1. “Pretext” another word for lie or falsehood
2. “Intel Leverage” is blackmail or extortion
3. Data base mining procedures are illegal wiretaps which provide “tips” to be used as “leads” to get “sanitized warrants” to be used as evidence in “due process” trials guided by “prosecutorial misconduct” for the security of Americans too stupid to understand that we (NSA) know what is best for them.
How long before NSA uses above definitions in EX PARTE trials to convict and sentence Americans to “special prisons” or national security termination practices? Before reader answers question; ask to see cost-benefit ratios for NSA operations. Translations – how many terrorist operations has NSA prevented? Then divide that number into NSA total budget expenditures. Then ask how many Americans Fourth Amendment Rights has NSA violated?
Answer should be this many Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights violated to disrupt this many terrorist operations for this many tax payer dollars. Should produce cost benefit ratio number.
More like truth, only way NSA can reduce their cost benefit ratio is by expanding their data base mining to provide scapegoats for Obama’s three purges: “number one”, “number two”, “number three”.
Background reference of Law.Com for EX PARTE (ex par-tay, but popularly, ex party) adj. Latin meaning "for one party," referring to motions, hearings or orders granted on the request of and for the benefit of one party only. This is an exception to the basic rule of court procedure that both parties must be present at any argument before a judge, and to the otherwise strict rule that an attorney may not notify a judge without previously notifying the opposition. Ex parte matters are usually temporary orders (like a restraining order or temporary custody) pending a formal hearing or an emergency request for a continuance. Most jurisdictions require at least a diligent attempt to contact the other party's lawyer of the time and place of any ex parte hearing.
Bonus question: Americans do not trust governments in general and NSA in particular, because governments and NSA do not trust Americans. What say you my reader, TRUE or TRUE.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Texas Drifter: Which Obama Purge Includes You?
Library Entry # 624
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Original title was “Just Anther Dream, Which Obama Purge Includes You?” All soul less tyrants share two identical personality traits: first is psychotic obsession to purge scapegoats tyrants blame for tyrants’ failed policies. Marxist-fascists live to purge and bury their imaginary scapegoats.
Second personality trait will be revealed towards end of this writing exercise.
Definitions:
1. Purge is to get rid of undesirable persons like excrement.
2. Marxist economic system is when all private property and means of production are owned by government or governments.
3. Fascist economic system is when all property and means of production are owned by private citizens, but are so regulated by government or government agencies like EPA that fascism eventually evolves into Marxist economic system.
4. Marxist-fascist economic system is when Marxist like Obama and corporate fascists like Republican establishment ruling aristocrats form temporary alliance.
Will purges result from Obamaization which is Obama only tolerating only those, who support all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies? Future history based on passed history suggests Obama will only tolerate those totally devoted without doubts to Obama’s “transformation” called “revolution” by other tyrants; as being trustworthy.
Can Obama’s intellectual psyche be compared to Lenin and Stalin of 1900’s in Russia? Excerpts from A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THEORY (Third edition) George H. Sabine publisher Holt, Rinehart, Winston copyrighted 1937, 1950, 1961 might provide some answers. Start excerpts:
1. “Marx always ‘really” meant what Lenin had decided what he (Lenin) ought to mean at the case at hand”
2. “It is government by a self chosen and self perpetuating elite that comprises the best qualified part of the people”
3. “As it is rule without constitutional limitations, or indeed without any limitation of method except those imposed by success and by its own professional good intentions”
4. “Not surprisingly, therefore the elite (dictatorship) can decide not only questions of policy but also ‘correctness’ of opinions.” (End excerpts)
Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to Stalin’s “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.
Some examples of tyrants who lived to purge and bury their scapegoats: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Castro of Cuba; plus other reader can list. Question, will Obama someday be added to preceding infamous list?
Also, will the contemporary alliance between Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites; workout better than the alliance formed before World War II between Stalin and Hitler?
Does the contemporary alliance between Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites define targets of Obama’s first purge (“purge one”)?
Reasonable conclusion could be yes, and the targets of Obama’s “purge one” are: Judeo-Christians; conservatives; constitutionalists; ethical capitalists; libertarians; Reagan Democrats; Americans with middle class attitudes (which includes many wealthy Americans); and other American patriots. Reader can add to this list of Obama “purge one” targets.
Moving on to Obama’s second purge targets (“purge two”). Targets of “purge two” will be corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites. Reader is probably thinking Texas Drifter knows not of what Texas Drifter writes. Two points who does Obama publicly denounce more than “purge one” targets?
Simple answer is decadent not paying their fair share wealthiest of wealthy. As history is prone to repeat and repeat; since Obama will have no more need of bi-partisan moderate Republicans, their future could be similar to – name following ruling elite aristocrats.
Public history: Late on the night of July 16, Nicholas, Alexandra, their five children and four servants were ordered to dress quickly and go down to the cellar of the house in which they were being held. There, the family and servants were arranged in two rows for a photograph they were told was being taken to quell rumors that they had escaped. Suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire. Those who were still breathing when the smoked cleared were stabbed to death.
One question for reader: would administration that has no conscience problems letting perhaps millions die from Obama Care; have any conscience problem treating mostly white folk like above aristocrat family was treated by what some call Obama mentor?
All those who think such brutal activities could never happen in America; simple example tyrants are not known for their loyalties to anyone. Consider how North Korean leader allegedly fed his uncle to wild dogs.
Now to Obama targets in Obama’s third purge (“purge three”). More likely than not, white Marxist-Fascist Progressive Democrats like Clintons, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, other Obama political allies reader can list.
List could also include White Hollywood elites that Obama could easily include as lump proletariat.
There will probably be many members of lump proletariat class really surprised when they discover what Obama really thinks of their social status. Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called lump proletariat which includes: Professional poor also called public subsidy addicts described by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed).
Other issues, on the bright side, those most likely to survive Obama’s purges will be those in “purge one” and those with middle class attitudes which support America’s Second Amendment. Why they are used to “working class ethics” and surviving bad times unlike “purge two” targets who are generally spoiled rich brats; while “purge three” targets are mostly professional welfare beggars and bureaucrats.
First purge victim survivors may seem conflicted when second purge victims turn to them for help. Texas Drifter, speaking only for myself; will have to decide on case by case basis. Why, compassion for those who spear headed Obama’s “purge one” may not be deserving of blind sympathy from their victims?
Side note, Texas Drifter was recruited in late sixties to infiltrate for intelligence radical anti-war groups. Assignment target groups turned out to be mostly funded, assisted, and managed by Soviets, Chinese, and Cuban Marxist governments. Pure fact which only fools can dispute.
One of first lessons learned in security for intelligence operations is: agent may not like, respect, or have any use for those on other side. Their personality traits along with their strengths and weaknesses not their ideology are what matters. Translation nothing about analysis is personal.
That is correct, determining security formula for success involves comparing strengths and weakness on both sides yours and theirs. Reader can reference other Texas Drifter writing exercises about learning how to manage bad guys.
Two mini-side notes: hate is wasted emotion which affects security analysis and performance. Two, scouts known as intelligence agents get paid to provide best non-prejudicial information they can; not baby sit stupid people or client fools.
Winding down questions, first, reader needs to consider that NSA data sweeps are not intended to identify terrorists; rather identify scapegoat targets for future Obama purges: one, two, and three. TRUE or FALSE
Question – Is Boehner betraying and selling out his conservative base to help Obama destroy America because Obama has “leverage information” on Boehner? TRUE or FALSE
Question - Odds are that “purge one” survivors will emerge as perhaps: leaner, smarter, tougher, and most effective patriots since glorious days of America’s founders? TRUE or FALSE
Perhaps next time some Republican Obama ally like McConnell or Boehner suggests conservatives should let Obama Care implode from its own in competencies; corruptions; and kill and injure millions of Americans? Should conservatives respond, perhaps conservatives should let Obama’s second purge follow its course since you will be one of “purge two” targets? TRUE or FALSE
Question, which one of Obama’s three purges: one; two; or three will target you my reader?
Second point, all tyrants share in common from Marshall’s Law Dateline – simple answer, all tyrants are mortals.
Editor Marshall asked Texas Drifter, why do you write such seeming brutally truthful words?
Texas Drifter’s response: First, my harsh words as you describe them are negligible in comparison to realities of real world horrors experienced by innocents during purges by any evil tyrant.
Second, If American patriots do not have courage to honor millions and millions of Americans who have died or were maimed defending Americans’ inalienable rights? How can any American expect to leave future Americans a republic worth defending?
Editor Marshall’s Note: I ask you reader the same Texas Drifter question. What say you?
Update Editor Marshall’s Note: No need for reader to answer above Editor’s Note question. Why this writing exercise was based on a dream. Remember original title: “Just Anther Dream, Which Obama Purge Includes You?”
Bonus question for fun – Despite constant bleating by conservative celebrities like (reader can list); word concepts “could of, would of, should of” never has and never will change past events. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Original title was “Just Anther Dream, Which Obama Purge Includes You?” All soul less tyrants share two identical personality traits: first is psychotic obsession to purge scapegoats tyrants blame for tyrants’ failed policies. Marxist-fascists live to purge and bury their imaginary scapegoats.
Second personality trait will be revealed towards end of this writing exercise.
Definitions:
1. Purge is to get rid of undesirable persons like excrement.
2. Marxist economic system is when all private property and means of production are owned by government or governments.
3. Fascist economic system is when all property and means of production are owned by private citizens, but are so regulated by government or government agencies like EPA that fascism eventually evolves into Marxist economic system.
4. Marxist-fascist economic system is when Marxist like Obama and corporate fascists like Republican establishment ruling aristocrats form temporary alliance.
Will purges result from Obamaization which is Obama only tolerating only those, who support all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies? Future history based on passed history suggests Obama will only tolerate those totally devoted without doubts to Obama’s “transformation” called “revolution” by other tyrants; as being trustworthy.
Can Obama’s intellectual psyche be compared to Lenin and Stalin of 1900’s in Russia? Excerpts from A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THEORY (Third edition) George H. Sabine publisher Holt, Rinehart, Winston copyrighted 1937, 1950, 1961 might provide some answers. Start excerpts:
1. “Marx always ‘really” meant what Lenin had decided what he (Lenin) ought to mean at the case at hand”
2. “It is government by a self chosen and self perpetuating elite that comprises the best qualified part of the people”
3. “As it is rule without constitutional limitations, or indeed without any limitation of method except those imposed by success and by its own professional good intentions”
4. “Not surprisingly, therefore the elite (dictatorship) can decide not only questions of policy but also ‘correctness’ of opinions.” (End excerpts)
Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to Stalin’s “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.
Some examples of tyrants who lived to purge and bury their scapegoats: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Castro of Cuba; plus other reader can list. Question, will Obama someday be added to preceding infamous list?
Also, will the contemporary alliance between Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites; workout better than the alliance formed before World War II between Stalin and Hitler?
Does the contemporary alliance between Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites define targets of Obama’s first purge (“purge one”)?
Reasonable conclusion could be yes, and the targets of Obama’s “purge one” are: Judeo-Christians; conservatives; constitutionalists; ethical capitalists; libertarians; Reagan Democrats; Americans with middle class attitudes (which includes many wealthy Americans); and other American patriots. Reader can add to this list of Obama “purge one” targets.
Moving on to Obama’s second purge targets (“purge two”). Targets of “purge two” will be corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites. Reader is probably thinking Texas Drifter knows not of what Texas Drifter writes. Two points who does Obama publicly denounce more than “purge one” targets?
Simple answer is decadent not paying their fair share wealthiest of wealthy. As history is prone to repeat and repeat; since Obama will have no more need of bi-partisan moderate Republicans, their future could be similar to – name following ruling elite aristocrats.
Public history: Late on the night of July 16, Nicholas, Alexandra, their five children and four servants were ordered to dress quickly and go down to the cellar of the house in which they were being held. There, the family and servants were arranged in two rows for a photograph they were told was being taken to quell rumors that they had escaped. Suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire. Those who were still breathing when the smoked cleared were stabbed to death.
One question for reader: would administration that has no conscience problems letting perhaps millions die from Obama Care; have any conscience problem treating mostly white folk like above aristocrat family was treated by what some call Obama mentor?
All those who think such brutal activities could never happen in America; simple example tyrants are not known for their loyalties to anyone. Consider how North Korean leader allegedly fed his uncle to wild dogs.
Now to Obama targets in Obama’s third purge (“purge three”). More likely than not, white Marxist-Fascist Progressive Democrats like Clintons, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, other Obama political allies reader can list.
List could also include White Hollywood elites that Obama could easily include as lump proletariat.
There will probably be many members of lump proletariat class really surprised when they discover what Obama really thinks of their social status. Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called lump proletariat which includes: Professional poor also called public subsidy addicts described by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed).
Other issues, on the bright side, those most likely to survive Obama’s purges will be those in “purge one” and those with middle class attitudes which support America’s Second Amendment. Why they are used to “working class ethics” and surviving bad times unlike “purge two” targets who are generally spoiled rich brats; while “purge three” targets are mostly professional welfare beggars and bureaucrats.
First purge victim survivors may seem conflicted when second purge victims turn to them for help. Texas Drifter, speaking only for myself; will have to decide on case by case basis. Why, compassion for those who spear headed Obama’s “purge one” may not be deserving of blind sympathy from their victims?
Side note, Texas Drifter was recruited in late sixties to infiltrate for intelligence radical anti-war groups. Assignment target groups turned out to be mostly funded, assisted, and managed by Soviets, Chinese, and Cuban Marxist governments. Pure fact which only fools can dispute.
One of first lessons learned in security for intelligence operations is: agent may not like, respect, or have any use for those on other side. Their personality traits along with their strengths and weaknesses not their ideology are what matters. Translation nothing about analysis is personal.
That is correct, determining security formula for success involves comparing strengths and weakness on both sides yours and theirs. Reader can reference other Texas Drifter writing exercises about learning how to manage bad guys.
Two mini-side notes: hate is wasted emotion which affects security analysis and performance. Two, scouts known as intelligence agents get paid to provide best non-prejudicial information they can; not baby sit stupid people or client fools.
Winding down questions, first, reader needs to consider that NSA data sweeps are not intended to identify terrorists; rather identify scapegoat targets for future Obama purges: one, two, and three. TRUE or FALSE
Question – Is Boehner betraying and selling out his conservative base to help Obama destroy America because Obama has “leverage information” on Boehner? TRUE or FALSE
Question - Odds are that “purge one” survivors will emerge as perhaps: leaner, smarter, tougher, and most effective patriots since glorious days of America’s founders? TRUE or FALSE
Perhaps next time some Republican Obama ally like McConnell or Boehner suggests conservatives should let Obama Care implode from its own in competencies; corruptions; and kill and injure millions of Americans? Should conservatives respond, perhaps conservatives should let Obama’s second purge follow its course since you will be one of “purge two” targets? TRUE or FALSE
Question, which one of Obama’s three purges: one; two; or three will target you my reader?
Second point, all tyrants share in common from Marshall’s Law Dateline – simple answer, all tyrants are mortals.
Editor Marshall asked Texas Drifter, why do you write such seeming brutally truthful words?
Texas Drifter’s response: First, my harsh words as you describe them are negligible in comparison to realities of real world horrors experienced by innocents during purges by any evil tyrant.
Second, If American patriots do not have courage to honor millions and millions of Americans who have died or were maimed defending Americans’ inalienable rights? How can any American expect to leave future Americans a republic worth defending?
Editor Marshall’s Note: I ask you reader the same Texas Drifter question. What say you?
Update Editor Marshall’s Note: No need for reader to answer above Editor’s Note question. Why this writing exercise was based on a dream. Remember original title: “Just Anther Dream, Which Obama Purge Includes You?”
Bonus question for fun – Despite constant bleating by conservative celebrities like (reader can list); word concepts “could of, would of, should of” never has and never will change past events. TRUE or FALSE
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Texas Drifter: Amnesty for Illegals Punishes Law Abiding
Library Entry # 623
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Amnesty for illegal immigrants’ rewards law breakers and punishes law abiding citizens. Americans who support due process legal immigration are patriots. Americans who support amnesty which encourages illegal immigrants to invade America are candidates for being unpatriotic traitors.
Translation, America is my castle; America is not illegal immigrants’ castle. Spanish language translation is: America es mi casa; America no es tu casa.
Article IV Section 4 of Unites States Constitution: the text - The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature can-not be convened) against domestic Violence.
How stupid does one have to be to not understand that twenty million plus illegal immigrants illegally entering into the Unites States is an invasion?
Often stated non-negotiable conservative comprehensive immigration policies should start with following.
1. Use American military forces to close America’s Southern border.
2. Use Border Patrol to apprehend illegal border crossers on American soil.
3. Use Immigration Services to apprehend visa jumpers on American soil.
4. Use Customs to secure legitimate ports and points of entry.
5. Use volunteer deportation policy, which is give illegal immigrants sixty days to take their ill gotten gains and return to where ever they want outside of America. Any illegal immigrant apprehended after sixty days, will administratively have all (all means all) their assets seized and they will deported; with no opportunity to ever return to America again.
6. Any illegal immigrant caught defrauding public services will be banned from ever returning to America.
7. Any illegal immigrant engaged in organized crime will be treated according to provisions dealing with terrorists.
8. Zero public benefits like “Dream Act” will be provided as rewards for criminal activities.
9. Provisions relating to anchor babies will be changed according to original intent of law; citizenship will only be conferred when parents are American citizens or legal residents; “chain link” immigration will not be permitted to anchor babies or others legal citizens except through regular immigration processes.
10. All vehicles entering America from Mexico must provide proof of registration, insurance, and meet all safety standards applying to American vehicles.
11. No so called cartel blood money can be used for investments into America’s commercial of private sectors.
12. American citizens will be allowed to seek civil damages in civil judicial process from those aiding or helping illegal immigrants. Example you allow illegal immigrant to live in your residence, and illegal immigrant kills someone in vehicle you allowed illegal to operate – offending party is subject to civil damages.
13. Victims of illegal immigrant crimes can set up non-profit organizations which offer bounties for turning in illegal immigrants “on the run” from the law.
14. Reader can offer additional suggestions.
Question, who will benefit from above policies:
1. legal immigrants;
2. law abiding hard working American Hispanic citizens;
3. All other American citizens.
Americans are entitled to protect their traditions, values, principles, constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic on Judeo-Christian beliefs, common law, and Article IV Section 4 of United States Constitution.
Reader can do their own research into castle law doctrine of the inviolability of the home which was known in both Roman Republic and English common law.
Simple question those most likely to whine about not using amnesty to reward criminal behavior while punishing law abiding citizens are:
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats for votes;
2. corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elites for greed;
3. ethnic and race haters who feels world owes them a living;
4. special interest groups;
5. Others reader can list.
TRUE or FALSE
Another question, is one who supports any form of amnesty which is used as bait to encourage illegal immigrants to invade America which is prohibited by Article IV Section 4 subjecting them to charge of treason?
Clue Article III, Section 3 - Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
End excerpt. Let the debate begin, providing of Aid and Comfort to twenty plus million illegal invaders many whom have engaged in: public fraud, property and violent crimes against private citizens, rises to what level of crime?
Politicians and public servants who provide Aid and Comfort are guilty of what level of crimes? Violating their oaths to Heaven and American people seems more than moral bankruptcy. Their oath to uphold, protect, and defend did not include making an exemption for Article IV Section 4. Question is not did they provide Aid and Comfort; question is did Aid and Comfort they provided rise to treason?
Are there sufficient numbers of Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and Republican corporate fascist ruling establishment aristocrat elites, who have traded their oaths to Heaven and American people for lust for power like Progressive Democrats and or lust for greed as Obama Republicans like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner plus others reader can list?
Does America now need a third political party called “Traders” which sounds similar to traitors? Could Traders logo be a capital letter “T” on their foreheads? Or perhaps more appropriate logos would be left half of swastika over lapped with capital “T”; or perhaps capital “T” over lapping sickle of Soviet Union Days? Who knows, only time will provide answer?
Perhaps answer will be provided by “Traders Party” allies like main stream news media, organizations like Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce; some public sector unions; reader can offer their suggestions. TRUE or FALSE
Perhaps Texas Drifter is offering America’s entrepreneurs potential profitable marketing concept? America’s new Traders Party will probably need marketing trinkets to let beneficiaries of their America last policies successes know who to keep bribing with votes, services, and dollars. TRUE or FALSE.
Texas Drifter starting to “feel” good liberal word, all writ out; offers following slogan for Traders Party: We steal for you; then share our crumbs. Surely reader has better idea.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Amnesty for illegal immigrants’ rewards law breakers and punishes law abiding citizens. Americans who support due process legal immigration are patriots. Americans who support amnesty which encourages illegal immigrants to invade America are candidates for being unpatriotic traitors.
Translation, America is my castle; America is not illegal immigrants’ castle. Spanish language translation is: America es mi casa; America no es tu casa.
Article IV Section 4 of Unites States Constitution: the text - The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature can-not be convened) against domestic Violence.
How stupid does one have to be to not understand that twenty million plus illegal immigrants illegally entering into the Unites States is an invasion?
Often stated non-negotiable conservative comprehensive immigration policies should start with following.
1. Use American military forces to close America’s Southern border.
2. Use Border Patrol to apprehend illegal border crossers on American soil.
3. Use Immigration Services to apprehend visa jumpers on American soil.
4. Use Customs to secure legitimate ports and points of entry.
5. Use volunteer deportation policy, which is give illegal immigrants sixty days to take their ill gotten gains and return to where ever they want outside of America. Any illegal immigrant apprehended after sixty days, will administratively have all (all means all) their assets seized and they will deported; with no opportunity to ever return to America again.
6. Any illegal immigrant caught defrauding public services will be banned from ever returning to America.
7. Any illegal immigrant engaged in organized crime will be treated according to provisions dealing with terrorists.
8. Zero public benefits like “Dream Act” will be provided as rewards for criminal activities.
9. Provisions relating to anchor babies will be changed according to original intent of law; citizenship will only be conferred when parents are American citizens or legal residents; “chain link” immigration will not be permitted to anchor babies or others legal citizens except through regular immigration processes.
10. All vehicles entering America from Mexico must provide proof of registration, insurance, and meet all safety standards applying to American vehicles.
11. No so called cartel blood money can be used for investments into America’s commercial of private sectors.
12. American citizens will be allowed to seek civil damages in civil judicial process from those aiding or helping illegal immigrants. Example you allow illegal immigrant to live in your residence, and illegal immigrant kills someone in vehicle you allowed illegal to operate – offending party is subject to civil damages.
13. Victims of illegal immigrant crimes can set up non-profit organizations which offer bounties for turning in illegal immigrants “on the run” from the law.
14. Reader can offer additional suggestions.
Question, who will benefit from above policies:
1. legal immigrants;
2. law abiding hard working American Hispanic citizens;
3. All other American citizens.
Americans are entitled to protect their traditions, values, principles, constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic on Judeo-Christian beliefs, common law, and Article IV Section 4 of United States Constitution.
Reader can do their own research into castle law doctrine of the inviolability of the home which was known in both Roman Republic and English common law.
Simple question those most likely to whine about not using amnesty to reward criminal behavior while punishing law abiding citizens are:
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats for votes;
2. corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elites for greed;
3. ethnic and race haters who feels world owes them a living;
4. special interest groups;
5. Others reader can list.
TRUE or FALSE
Another question, is one who supports any form of amnesty which is used as bait to encourage illegal immigrants to invade America which is prohibited by Article IV Section 4 subjecting them to charge of treason?
Clue Article III, Section 3 - Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
End excerpt. Let the debate begin, providing of Aid and Comfort to twenty plus million illegal invaders many whom have engaged in: public fraud, property and violent crimes against private citizens, rises to what level of crime?
Politicians and public servants who provide Aid and Comfort are guilty of what level of crimes? Violating their oaths to Heaven and American people seems more than moral bankruptcy. Their oath to uphold, protect, and defend did not include making an exemption for Article IV Section 4. Question is not did they provide Aid and Comfort; question is did Aid and Comfort they provided rise to treason?
Are there sufficient numbers of Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and Republican corporate fascist ruling establishment aristocrat elites, who have traded their oaths to Heaven and American people for lust for power like Progressive Democrats and or lust for greed as Obama Republicans like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner plus others reader can list?
Does America now need a third political party called “Traders” which sounds similar to traitors? Could Traders logo be a capital letter “T” on their foreheads? Or perhaps more appropriate logos would be left half of swastika over lapped with capital “T”; or perhaps capital “T” over lapping sickle of Soviet Union Days? Who knows, only time will provide answer?
Perhaps answer will be provided by “Traders Party” allies like main stream news media, organizations like Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce; some public sector unions; reader can offer their suggestions. TRUE or FALSE
Perhaps Texas Drifter is offering America’s entrepreneurs potential profitable marketing concept? America’s new Traders Party will probably need marketing trinkets to let beneficiaries of their America last policies successes know who to keep bribing with votes, services, and dollars. TRUE or FALSE.
Texas Drifter starting to “feel” good liberal word, all writ out; offers following slogan for Traders Party: We steal for you; then share our crumbs. Surely reader has better idea.
Monday, January 13, 2014
Texas Drifter: Compassion Now A Bad Word?
Library Entry # 622
Marshall’s Law Dateline – First propaganda technique used by evil among us in U.S. is diluting then changing meanings of often used words to promote their evil ways. Restating ignored obvious, some words can have different meanings to different people.
Two examples, first case involves teenage boy telling his young girlfriend: “I love you”. Translation “because when you are high you are promiscuous and believe my lies.” What young intoxicated girl hears: He loves me because of my fabulous body and great personality.”
Second example what Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites mean when they use “contemporary word” compassion to conservatives and what conservatives think traditional word compassion means. Can argument be made that most conservatives are like naïve drunk teenage girls who like being abused by Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites with morals of teenage boys full of lust?
Perhaps few definitions will help reader better understand above question? Definition of bad is; if you my reader do not know definition of bad? Reader must have gone to public school where bad is good and good is bad. Suggestion, do not waste your time reading this writing exercise.
Conservative traditional definition of compassion is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with desire to alleviate their distress.
Contemporary Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ definition of compassion is possessing imaginary guilt for others’ distress, together with desire not to be blamed by liberals for “not caring” by not stealing enough other peoples’ money through excessive taxes to reward lazy public subsidy welfare addicts; professional poor also called government plantation slaves.
Some examples of Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ contemporary word compassion benefits:
1. Marxist-fascists and their insatiable lust for social, economic, and political power;
2. Corporate fascists and their insatiable lust for greed funded though special government regulations and funding deals;
3. Others’ greed and selfishness like professional welfare addicts, some public unions, and illegal immigrants;
4. Ignorant and uneducated;
5. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites economic and political power;
6. Others reader can list.
Consequences of these Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites propaganda will be:
1. government plantation slaves who are mostly useless in that they have to steal others’ property to survive;
2. Marxist-fascist regulations and policies which are not only destructive to America’s traditions, values, and principles; but also self destructive to bad guys themselves;
3. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ polices and political deeds which will also be self destructive for Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites who future historians will be described, in America, with as much animosity as Judas is describes among Christians;
4. Near fatal collateral damage to America’s traditions, values, principles, and constitutional ethical capitalist republic.
To re-emphasize earlier point, seems sad that Obama Republicans also known as Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites have turned compassion a word describing a once noble trait into an evil concept which benefits evil among us in U.S.
Much like Progressive Liberal Democrats have turned word “love” into synonym for promiscuous. Or conservatives have cheapened by over use concept “great American”. Two points, “great Americans” do not have to keep reminding others they are great Americans. Reducing concept “great American” to insignificant greeting is disrespectful to truly “Great Americans”. TRUE or FALSE
Another question: capitalism without integrity is unethical and violates “Thou shall Not Steal” Commandment. Translation ethical capitalism produces most assets available for compassion by traditional definition. While unethical capitalism and or corporate fascism are based on stealing and only produce unholy compassion based on contemporary definition.
This concept is ignored by most free market advocates who believe that it is alright to steal from others with unethical capitalism or corporate fascism; and that governments should not be able to tax their ill-gotten gains. TRUE or FALSE
First Bonus question – Is compassion now a bad word? Answer - yes when it is used with contemporary meaning by Marxist-fascists, Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites, and their allies. TRUE or FALSE.
Extra Three Bonus Point question: The first rule of Marxist- Fascists like Obama and his inner circle is to carry out purges of all 1) political opponents called “political or ideological traitors”, including 2) imaginary “scapegoats” like conservatives and Tea Party Members at all costs using any purely wicked tactic necessary. TRUE or FALSE – one point
Why, Obamaization of all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies only tolerates those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: like Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. TRUE or FALSE – second point
Texas Drifter hopes that I am around long enough to hear reported that Obamaization has started “eating their own” like Biden, Reid, and Clintons. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.
Have no fear my reader, Conservative celebrities like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Beck, plus others reader can list can, to use their vanities to talk enough compassionate words, to cause Marxist-fascists to become sensitive caring political leaders. Doubt this observation reader can channel Trotsky’s atheist Marxist spirit to make your self feel better. TRUE or FALSE – third point
Again Texas Drifter is not advocating non-self defense violence; just asking reader to consider that just talking should not be only option left on metaphorical table. TRUE not FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – First propaganda technique used by evil among us in U.S. is diluting then changing meanings of often used words to promote their evil ways. Restating ignored obvious, some words can have different meanings to different people.
Two examples, first case involves teenage boy telling his young girlfriend: “I love you”. Translation “because when you are high you are promiscuous and believe my lies.” What young intoxicated girl hears: He loves me because of my fabulous body and great personality.”
Second example what Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites mean when they use “contemporary word” compassion to conservatives and what conservatives think traditional word compassion means. Can argument be made that most conservatives are like naïve drunk teenage girls who like being abused by Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites with morals of teenage boys full of lust?
Perhaps few definitions will help reader better understand above question? Definition of bad is; if you my reader do not know definition of bad? Reader must have gone to public school where bad is good and good is bad. Suggestion, do not waste your time reading this writing exercise.
Conservative traditional definition of compassion is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with desire to alleviate their distress.
Contemporary Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ definition of compassion is possessing imaginary guilt for others’ distress, together with desire not to be blamed by liberals for “not caring” by not stealing enough other peoples’ money through excessive taxes to reward lazy public subsidy welfare addicts; professional poor also called government plantation slaves.
Some examples of Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ contemporary word compassion benefits:
1. Marxist-fascists and their insatiable lust for social, economic, and political power;
2. Corporate fascists and their insatiable lust for greed funded though special government regulations and funding deals;
3. Others’ greed and selfishness like professional welfare addicts, some public unions, and illegal immigrants;
4. Ignorant and uneducated;
5. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites economic and political power;
6. Others reader can list.
Consequences of these Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites propaganda will be:
1. government plantation slaves who are mostly useless in that they have to steal others’ property to survive;
2. Marxist-fascist regulations and policies which are not only destructive to America’s traditions, values, and principles; but also self destructive to bad guys themselves;
3. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ polices and political deeds which will also be self destructive for Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites who future historians will be described, in America, with as much animosity as Judas is describes among Christians;
4. Near fatal collateral damage to America’s traditions, values, principles, and constitutional ethical capitalist republic.
To re-emphasize earlier point, seems sad that Obama Republicans also known as Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites have turned compassion a word describing a once noble trait into an evil concept which benefits evil among us in U.S.
Much like Progressive Liberal Democrats have turned word “love” into synonym for promiscuous. Or conservatives have cheapened by over use concept “great American”. Two points, “great Americans” do not have to keep reminding others they are great Americans. Reducing concept “great American” to insignificant greeting is disrespectful to truly “Great Americans”. TRUE or FALSE
Another question: capitalism without integrity is unethical and violates “Thou shall Not Steal” Commandment. Translation ethical capitalism produces most assets available for compassion by traditional definition. While unethical capitalism and or corporate fascism are based on stealing and only produce unholy compassion based on contemporary definition.
This concept is ignored by most free market advocates who believe that it is alright to steal from others with unethical capitalism or corporate fascism; and that governments should not be able to tax their ill-gotten gains. TRUE or FALSE
First Bonus question – Is compassion now a bad word? Answer - yes when it is used with contemporary meaning by Marxist-fascists, Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites, and their allies. TRUE or FALSE.
Extra Three Bonus Point question: The first rule of Marxist- Fascists like Obama and his inner circle is to carry out purges of all 1) political opponents called “political or ideological traitors”, including 2) imaginary “scapegoats” like conservatives and Tea Party Members at all costs using any purely wicked tactic necessary. TRUE or FALSE – one point
Why, Obamaization of all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies only tolerates those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: like Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. TRUE or FALSE – second point
Texas Drifter hopes that I am around long enough to hear reported that Obamaization has started “eating their own” like Biden, Reid, and Clintons. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.
Have no fear my reader, Conservative celebrities like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Beck, plus others reader can list can, to use their vanities to talk enough compassionate words, to cause Marxist-fascists to become sensitive caring political leaders. Doubt this observation reader can channel Trotsky’s atheist Marxist spirit to make your self feel better. TRUE or FALSE – third point
Again Texas Drifter is not advocating non-self defense violence; just asking reader to consider that just talking should not be only option left on metaphorical table. TRUE not FALSE
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Texas Drifter: Of Good and Evil Bureaucrats
Library Entry # 621
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Distinctions exist between patriotic bureaucrats who know differences between good and evil; and ideologue bureaucrats who serve their fanatic hate motivated prejudices at all costs.
Definition of ideologue is especially zealous supporter often motivated by hate of self serving social, economic, political belief system.
Definition of patriot is someone who proudly supports and or defends their country’s traditions, values, principles, and or best interest.
Being up front, Texas Drifter’s experienced based perceptions are limited to managing two to eight member teams; generally structured into two management styles.
1. Company manager and component members.
2. Company manager with all team members also being themselves experienced company managers.
Great product result, almost spontaneous efficiency as team’s component members knew what to do without asking clarification questions before carrying out assignment duties.
Side note, having experiences of managing or being team member of company managers components teams; creates future memories worth keeping. Every team member knows without communicating what needs to be done, and just do their job regardless of assignment challenges.
Totally different management skills are needed when organization consists of tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of team members known as bureaucrats. Assignment tasks are different for bureaucrat administrators than for “specialty team” company managers’ two to eight member teams.
Definition of bureaucracy is administrative system that divides work into specific categories carried out by special departments operating by too rigid non-flexible rules.
Patriotic bureaucrat administrators and bureaucrats are “more likely” to be found in agencies dealing with law enforcement, investigations, intelligence gathering, security, and armed forces. Key concept is “more likely or generally”.
Ideologue bureaucrat administrators and bureaucrats are usually found in agencies dealing with fascist regulations; welfare related social services; education services; hate motivated judicial processes like Hitler’s Gestapo / Obama’s Justice Department and judicial nominees; special interest hate groups like many environmentalists. Reader can add to list.
What makes these agencies so dangerous is their “promoting incompetent; corrupt; and minority haters” up organizational structure rather than terminating or firing worst of worst bureaucrats’ employment from public sector.
Some examples of these of these agencies which have also been promotes dumbest and mot corrupt to top which have also been “politicized” by Marxist-fascists and Obama Republicans include: Agriculture; Civil Rights, Commerce, Education, Energy; Human Services; Health Services; IRS; Justice – reader can add to list.
In case reader has not asked, there is a third type of bureaucrats; those who serve anyone who signs their pay checks. These amoral bureaucrats will serve Beel Zebub or one of Heaven’s prophets depending on who offers best employment package. Positive trait for patriotic bureaucrats, as these civil servants can be co-opted away from ideologue bureaucrats.
Word to wise to patriot bureaucrats, amoral bureaucrats will turn on their benefactor for promises of better employment package.
Reader will find that it is considerably easier to identify more public ideologue bureaucrats than patriot bureaucrats. Working example is for reader to list all ideologue bureaucrats they can in sixty seconds. Now list all patriot bureaucrats they can in sixty seconds. This list would have to start with Dr. Robert M. Gates former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense. TRUE or FALSE
Reader still needs to test their knowledge of great American patriot bureaucrats by listing patriot bureaucrats.
Great equalizer for ideological bureaucrats is adopting “Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation” to provide just compensation for citizens victimized by ideologue bureaucrats. Concept sovereign immunity applies to “elected sovereign” while they are in office not un-elected ideologue bureaucrats.
Often cited concept: sovereign immunity is not waived unless sovereign has waived its immunity or consented to wave its immunity. The United States has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent.
Time has arrived for sovereign immunity to apply only to sovereign as tradition suggests; but sovereign immunity should no longer be extended to sovereign’s representatives like bureaucrats. That is unless sovereign wants to be considered accessories sovereign’s representatives’ crimes. TRUE or FALSE
Expecting any virtuous conduct from pure evil is fool’s dream.
Question - If “whistle blower acts” protects patriotic bureaucrats who know where Obama Administration and Obama Republicans evil secrets are stashed? Should reader reference “Texas Drifter: Shadow Warriors Tie breakers?” published November 2013 by All Right Magazine or Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library. YES or HECK YES
Texas Drifter is more or less in good mood, and will provide reader clue prior to following bonus questions - reference “Texas Drifter: NFL Evolving Into Unethical Capitalism?” published early January 2014.
1. Should Chamber of Commerce (COC) change their name to Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce (COCFC)? YES or NO
2. IF answer is yes, should reader contact their local COC (Chamber of Commerce) and ask them to have integrity and change their name to COCFC? YES or NO
3. Really if they are going to act like unethical capitalists or corporate fascists; why should they be ashamed to be identified by their actions: supporting cheap labor by supporting amnesty for criminal immigrants; supporting Obama Care so they can quit providing their employees heath care benefits; seeking special government regulations to provide COCFC members “cheater’s edge” in market place; plus attempting to destroy conservatives, libertarians, Christians, and others reader can list. TRUE or FALSE
Reader is probably thinking, thought this writing exercise was about: Distinctions existing between patriotic bureaucrats who know differences between good and evil; and ideologue bureaucrats who serve their fanatic hate motivated prejudices at all costs.
Simple response, are not corporate fascists one of two of America’s most dangerous users of ideologue bureaucrats threatening America’s traditions, values, and principles? What say you my reader? YES or NO
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Texas Drifter: Conservatives Good Intentions Impotent?
Library Entry # 620
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Peace for conservatives and libertarians means live and let live; while peace for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats means burying their enemies.
Those who doubt this need only review lessons of Stalin, Mao, Cuba’s Castro, and Obama’s other mentors. Storm clouds will continue to build on America’s horizons; while minorities continue to get special privileges; while America’s majority, gets no justice.
Definition of intention is what one plans to do.
Definition of impotent is without strength or power to do anything effective or helpful.
Good conservative or libertarian plans have been, still are, and will continue to be wasted words unless reader has abilities, resources, and discipline to win.
Texas Drifter is not encouraging, condoning, suggesting, recommending, advocating, inciting or any other proactive verb for use of non-self defense violence.
Texas Drifter is encouraging, condoning, suggesting, recommending, advocating, inciting or any proactive verb reader chooses to use, to leave all options on “metaphorical table” involving self defense.
Reader is encouraged to identify all examples of sociopathic, psychopathic, or poliopathic tyrants being talked into changing their evil ways and becoming law abiding civilized political leaders.
Two examples, Heaven’s envoy Moses relied on physical messages from Moses Heavenly Father. Gandhi in India was dealing with civilized British not tyrants like Stalin or Mao, or other brutal dictators reader can list. Rader can also include want to be dictators in their list including groups like Islamic terrorists.
Again, repetition is good teaching tool. Reference threats confronting America’s Patriots from earlier Texas Drifter writing exercise.
Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ and corporate fascist Obama Republicans’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called proletariat:
1. Professional poor also called public subsidy addicts described by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed);
2. Hate all men feminists;
3. Minority racist perpetual victims’ haters;
4. Hetero phobic haters;
5. Some public employees and public unions’ administrators and regulators of government plantation policies of hate;
6. Corporate fascists and Obama Republicans who financially benefit from government policies of greed;
7. Special interest ideological haters like radical environmentalists;
8. Spoiled brats from wealthy homes who like to hate and “get even” with parents who substituted retail products for loving caring families;
9. Other sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to Marxist-fascist cause which legitimizes their devotions to hating and hurting others;
10. Illegal immigrant non-citizens who have no cultural ties to America’s traditions, values, and principles who have no desire to become Americans; rather their motives are establish “colonies” serving their foreign homelands.
Challenges by many conservative celebrities, is trying to only talk evil among us in U.S. into changing their evil ways. Top of this list includes many Yankee Republican carpetbagger scalawag celebrity talk show hosts and columnists. These ratings for advertising dollars motivated celebrities seem cheered on, by their “true believer” clique followers who are blinded by vanities of all involved.
Yet to be decided conservative – libertarian- Regan Democrat coalition which will preserve original intent of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic; seems to be forming as storm clouds continue to rumble on America’s horizon.
Back to understanding that talking bad guys into being nice people is very low percentage strategy. TRUE or FALSE
Scenario – Several armed crack addicts break into your home with intentions of making you watch them sexually abuse then torture your wife and children to death; before beating you to death while vandalizing and robbing your home.
Do you my reader really believe talking home invading crack addicts into becoming compassionate bad guys is viable strategy to protect your family and property? What is difference between home invading crack addicts and home invading government plantation storm troopers?
Clue: Ask why some law enforcement agencies have changed from carrying 9MM side arms to forty caliber side arms.
Another example, generally most hazardous responses for law enforcement personnel are domestic violence calls. Ask any law enforcement officer how safe they would feel if depending only on talking was their only defensive tool; especially when trying to separate out of control feuding spouses.
Texas Drifter is not suggesting talking or negotiating should not be primary strategy; rather recommending that all other options be left on metaphorical table. Reader not “in the business” needs to understand that consequences of real world scenarios are final events; without feel good second chances to make losers feel better for trying.
Odds for success are increased with: 1) training; 2) appropriate assets; 3) real world experiences; and 4) mental discipline to be successful. TRUE or FALSE
How can real world patriotic conservatives, libertarians, Regan Democrats respond to name calling, insults, and being belittled by talk show celebrities and their cliques or cult allies? Especially when those celebrities believe talking is only option to manage domestic or foreign threats from Marxist-fascists, Obama Republicans, or international terrorist nations like Iran.
Partial answer is carry on undistracted from preparing for inevitable; if security pretenders mature up; good, if not most who understand that sometimes reality is not pleasant, were not really depending on vain among us in U.S. anyway. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Question: Opening “Dateline” for this writing exercise as follows: – Peace for conservatives and libertarians means live and let live; while peace for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats means burying their enemies.
Those who doubt this need only review lessons of Stalin, Mao, Cuba’s Castro. And Obama’s other mentors. Storm clouds will continue to build on America’s horizons; while minorities get special privileges, and America’s majority, gets no justice. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Peace for conservatives and libertarians means live and let live; while peace for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats means burying their enemies.
Those who doubt this need only review lessons of Stalin, Mao, Cuba’s Castro, and Obama’s other mentors. Storm clouds will continue to build on America’s horizons; while minorities continue to get special privileges; while America’s majority, gets no justice.
Definition of intention is what one plans to do.
Definition of impotent is without strength or power to do anything effective or helpful.
Good conservative or libertarian plans have been, still are, and will continue to be wasted words unless reader has abilities, resources, and discipline to win.
Texas Drifter is not encouraging, condoning, suggesting, recommending, advocating, inciting or any other proactive verb for use of non-self defense violence.
Texas Drifter is encouraging, condoning, suggesting, recommending, advocating, inciting or any proactive verb reader chooses to use, to leave all options on “metaphorical table” involving self defense.
Reader is encouraged to identify all examples of sociopathic, psychopathic, or poliopathic tyrants being talked into changing their evil ways and becoming law abiding civilized political leaders.
Two examples, Heaven’s envoy Moses relied on physical messages from Moses Heavenly Father. Gandhi in India was dealing with civilized British not tyrants like Stalin or Mao, or other brutal dictators reader can list. Rader can also include want to be dictators in their list including groups like Islamic terrorists.
Again, repetition is good teaching tool. Reference threats confronting America’s Patriots from earlier Texas Drifter writing exercise.
Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ and corporate fascist Obama Republicans’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called proletariat:
1. Professional poor also called public subsidy addicts described by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed);
2. Hate all men feminists;
3. Minority racist perpetual victims’ haters;
4. Hetero phobic haters;
5. Some public employees and public unions’ administrators and regulators of government plantation policies of hate;
6. Corporate fascists and Obama Republicans who financially benefit from government policies of greed;
7. Special interest ideological haters like radical environmentalists;
8. Spoiled brats from wealthy homes who like to hate and “get even” with parents who substituted retail products for loving caring families;
9. Other sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to Marxist-fascist cause which legitimizes their devotions to hating and hurting others;
10. Illegal immigrant non-citizens who have no cultural ties to America’s traditions, values, and principles who have no desire to become Americans; rather their motives are establish “colonies” serving their foreign homelands.
Challenges by many conservative celebrities, is trying to only talk evil among us in U.S. into changing their evil ways. Top of this list includes many Yankee Republican carpetbagger scalawag celebrity talk show hosts and columnists. These ratings for advertising dollars motivated celebrities seem cheered on, by their “true believer” clique followers who are blinded by vanities of all involved.
Yet to be decided conservative – libertarian- Regan Democrat coalition which will preserve original intent of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic; seems to be forming as storm clouds continue to rumble on America’s horizon.
Back to understanding that talking bad guys into being nice people is very low percentage strategy. TRUE or FALSE
Scenario – Several armed crack addicts break into your home with intentions of making you watch them sexually abuse then torture your wife and children to death; before beating you to death while vandalizing and robbing your home.
Do you my reader really believe talking home invading crack addicts into becoming compassionate bad guys is viable strategy to protect your family and property? What is difference between home invading crack addicts and home invading government plantation storm troopers?
Clue: Ask why some law enforcement agencies have changed from carrying 9MM side arms to forty caliber side arms.
Another example, generally most hazardous responses for law enforcement personnel are domestic violence calls. Ask any law enforcement officer how safe they would feel if depending only on talking was their only defensive tool; especially when trying to separate out of control feuding spouses.
Texas Drifter is not suggesting talking or negotiating should not be primary strategy; rather recommending that all other options be left on metaphorical table. Reader not “in the business” needs to understand that consequences of real world scenarios are final events; without feel good second chances to make losers feel better for trying.
Odds for success are increased with: 1) training; 2) appropriate assets; 3) real world experiences; and 4) mental discipline to be successful. TRUE or FALSE
How can real world patriotic conservatives, libertarians, Regan Democrats respond to name calling, insults, and being belittled by talk show celebrities and their cliques or cult allies? Especially when those celebrities believe talking is only option to manage domestic or foreign threats from Marxist-fascists, Obama Republicans, or international terrorist nations like Iran.
Partial answer is carry on undistracted from preparing for inevitable; if security pretenders mature up; good, if not most who understand that sometimes reality is not pleasant, were not really depending on vain among us in U.S. anyway. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Question: Opening “Dateline” for this writing exercise as follows: – Peace for conservatives and libertarians means live and let live; while peace for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats means burying their enemies.
Those who doubt this need only review lessons of Stalin, Mao, Cuba’s Castro. And Obama’s other mentors. Storm clouds will continue to build on America’s horizons; while minorities get special privileges, and America’s majority, gets no justice. TRUE or FALSE
Monday, January 6, 2014
Texas Drifter: Heterophobes Also Haters?
Library Entry # 619
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Real bigots and haters in America includes, read on reader.
Definition of hate is intense hostility deriving from fear, anger, resentment, or hostility.
Definition of hetero is heterosexual.
Definition of heterosexual is relating to opposite sex.
Definition of phobia is exaggerated usually intolerable fear of particular objects or class of objects.
Contemporary definition of heterophobia questions:
1. Can heterophobia the unreasonable fear of heterosexuals motivated by excessive hatreds result in sociopathic behavior not classified as hate crimes by Progressive Democrats and Obama Republicans?
2. Can some heterophobes act no differently than any other antisocial psychopathic haters like Hitler’s Nazis or Islamic fascist terrorists?
3. Is heterophobia comparable to hate crimes by some racist minority Blacks against Anglos which are not considered hate crimes by Obama Administration and Obama Republicans?
What are old adages, truth is impartial; sword of justice cuts both ways; and turnabout is fair play. Like freedom of association includes freedom of non association?
America’s First Amendment prohibits government from respecting establishment of religion; and conversely prohibits government from disrespecting established religions.
Gays have rights to establish civil contracts to bind their social relationships. Gays do not have rights to use powers of governments to compromise others’ religious principles. How, by desecrating others’ religious doctrines which define sanctity of marriage based on other’s religious beliefs. TRUE or FALSE
Integrity of constitutional due processes requires equal applications and equal protections by law for all citizens; and does not include special exemptions for most vocal minority groups. Special treatment for “special groups” or minorities is one of cornerstones of fascist tyrannies
Example, Obama and Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats have no constitutional authority to “legalize” hate crimes for any reason by Blacks or any other minorities against Anglos or any other group. Specific example, “affirmative action” represents special benefits based on ethnic or racist prejudices motivated by hatreds against deceased generations not living generations.
Brutal truth, rewarding public subsidy addicts also called professional welfare recipients with affirmative action policies creates non-self sufficient citizens who are in actuality little more than government plantation slaves? TRUE or FALSE
Question, are some gays, heterophobes because heterosexuals remind them of what traditional values and principles considered as “normal” behavior by majority standards?
Consider, could “yet” unproven existence of “gay gene” suggest gay choices are free will decisions? Is it not possible gays who can not maintain stable heterosexual relations seek out other “losers” who also can not maintain long term relations with heterosexuals? TRUE or FALSE
Core premise of this writing exercise is timeless truths can create enemies; plus judgment day is personal. Also consider the following: Problem with justifying compromising principles with compassion or political correctness is number of available compromises.
Compromise half of your principles today; half tomorrow; half next day; half following day; half day after; by the time one reaches end of week, one has no more principles to compromise. Reader doubts this Texas Drifter observation reader can run their own numbers for compromising half you principles a day for seven day week.
Brutal truth: majority of heterosexuals are not homophobic; while much larger percentage of gays, are heterophobes. TRUE or FALSE
Also most Anglos are not racists while greater percentage of minority members are racist against Anglos and conservative Christians. TRUE or FALSE
Remember First Amendment protects one’s right to ask questions even if those questions are politically incorrect, and or embarrasses abusive hate promoting governments. Reader can again reference: All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: First Amendment Protects Asking Questions December 2013.
To restate question in title of this writing exercise: Heterophobes Also Haters? TRUE or FALSE
Definition of bigot is one intolerantly devoted to their own personal prejudices. Translation, blaming present of future peoples for abuses of past generations is good example of bigotry.
Could one surmise heterophobes and minority racists’ are haters because of their bigoted, motivated prejudicial thought processes against 1) Anglos; 2) conservative minorities; 3) non-liberation theology Christians and 4) ethical capitalist patriots? YES or NO
Another question, is the time near when America’s non-haters majority will stand up to all groups of bigoted haters including heterophobes, and minority racists who are both classic example of mean spirited bullies? YES or NO
One problem of getting to be “on in years” author, is sometimes author forgets what they have already included in their writing exercise. Texas Drifter does not recall if I already referenced barren looking all men hating feminist bigoted haters or not. TRUE or FALSE
Two Part Bonus Question
Part I – Propaganda shields for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats are:
1. World owes us perpetual entitlements because we are perpetual victims;
2. Political correctness to fend off truthful criticisms;
3. Phony compassion by pretender conservatives to tolerantly support Marxist-fascist abuses and tyrannies;
4. Reader can add to list.
Part II – Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ and corporate fascist Obama Republicans’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called proletariat:
1. Professional poor public subsidy addicts describes by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed);
2. Hate all men feminists;
3. Minority racist perpetual victims haters;
4. Heterophobes haters;
5. Some public employees and public unions’ administrators and regulators of government plantation policies of hate;
6. Corporate fascists and Obama Republicans who financially benefit from government policies of greed;
7. Special interest ideological haters like radical environmentalists;
8. Spoiled brats from wealthy homes who like to hate and “get even” with parents who substituted retail products for loving caring families;
9. Other sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to Marxist-fascist cause which legitimizes their devotions to hating and hurting others;
10. Illegal immigrant non-citizens who have no cultural ties to America’s traditions, values, and principles who have no desire to become Americans; rather their motives are establish “colonies” serving their foreign homelands;
11. Reader can add to list.
If Part I and Part II are both true; America’s saving grace is that majority of Americans are not greedy, selfish, mean spirited haters, and will not become Massa Obama’s enforcers on governments’ plantations. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Real bigots and haters in America includes, read on reader.
Definition of hate is intense hostility deriving from fear, anger, resentment, or hostility.
Definition of hetero is heterosexual.
Definition of heterosexual is relating to opposite sex.
Definition of phobia is exaggerated usually intolerable fear of particular objects or class of objects.
Contemporary definition of heterophobia questions:
1. Can heterophobia the unreasonable fear of heterosexuals motivated by excessive hatreds result in sociopathic behavior not classified as hate crimes by Progressive Democrats and Obama Republicans?
2. Can some heterophobes act no differently than any other antisocial psychopathic haters like Hitler’s Nazis or Islamic fascist terrorists?
3. Is heterophobia comparable to hate crimes by some racist minority Blacks against Anglos which are not considered hate crimes by Obama Administration and Obama Republicans?
What are old adages, truth is impartial; sword of justice cuts both ways; and turnabout is fair play. Like freedom of association includes freedom of non association?
America’s First Amendment prohibits government from respecting establishment of religion; and conversely prohibits government from disrespecting established religions.
Gays have rights to establish civil contracts to bind their social relationships. Gays do not have rights to use powers of governments to compromise others’ religious principles. How, by desecrating others’ religious doctrines which define sanctity of marriage based on other’s religious beliefs. TRUE or FALSE
Integrity of constitutional due processes requires equal applications and equal protections by law for all citizens; and does not include special exemptions for most vocal minority groups. Special treatment for “special groups” or minorities is one of cornerstones of fascist tyrannies
Example, Obama and Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats have no constitutional authority to “legalize” hate crimes for any reason by Blacks or any other minorities against Anglos or any other group. Specific example, “affirmative action” represents special benefits based on ethnic or racist prejudices motivated by hatreds against deceased generations not living generations.
Brutal truth, rewarding public subsidy addicts also called professional welfare recipients with affirmative action policies creates non-self sufficient citizens who are in actuality little more than government plantation slaves? TRUE or FALSE
Question, are some gays, heterophobes because heterosexuals remind them of what traditional values and principles considered as “normal” behavior by majority standards?
Consider, could “yet” unproven existence of “gay gene” suggest gay choices are free will decisions? Is it not possible gays who can not maintain stable heterosexual relations seek out other “losers” who also can not maintain long term relations with heterosexuals? TRUE or FALSE
Core premise of this writing exercise is timeless truths can create enemies; plus judgment day is personal. Also consider the following: Problem with justifying compromising principles with compassion or political correctness is number of available compromises.
Compromise half of your principles today; half tomorrow; half next day; half following day; half day after; by the time one reaches end of week, one has no more principles to compromise. Reader doubts this Texas Drifter observation reader can run their own numbers for compromising half you principles a day for seven day week.
Brutal truth: majority of heterosexuals are not homophobic; while much larger percentage of gays, are heterophobes. TRUE or FALSE
Also most Anglos are not racists while greater percentage of minority members are racist against Anglos and conservative Christians. TRUE or FALSE
Remember First Amendment protects one’s right to ask questions even if those questions are politically incorrect, and or embarrasses abusive hate promoting governments. Reader can again reference: All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: First Amendment Protects Asking Questions December 2013.
To restate question in title of this writing exercise: Heterophobes Also Haters? TRUE or FALSE
Definition of bigot is one intolerantly devoted to their own personal prejudices. Translation, blaming present of future peoples for abuses of past generations is good example of bigotry.
Could one surmise heterophobes and minority racists’ are haters because of their bigoted, motivated prejudicial thought processes against 1) Anglos; 2) conservative minorities; 3) non-liberation theology Christians and 4) ethical capitalist patriots? YES or NO
Another question, is the time near when America’s non-haters majority will stand up to all groups of bigoted haters including heterophobes, and minority racists who are both classic example of mean spirited bullies? YES or NO
One problem of getting to be “on in years” author, is sometimes author forgets what they have already included in their writing exercise. Texas Drifter does not recall if I already referenced barren looking all men hating feminist bigoted haters or not. TRUE or FALSE
Two Part Bonus Question
Part I – Propaganda shields for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats are:
1. World owes us perpetual entitlements because we are perpetual victims;
2. Political correctness to fend off truthful criticisms;
3. Phony compassion by pretender conservatives to tolerantly support Marxist-fascist abuses and tyrannies;
4. Reader can add to list.
Part II – Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ and corporate fascist Obama Republicans’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called proletariat:
1. Professional poor public subsidy addicts describes by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed);
2. Hate all men feminists;
3. Minority racist perpetual victims haters;
4. Heterophobes haters;
5. Some public employees and public unions’ administrators and regulators of government plantation policies of hate;
6. Corporate fascists and Obama Republicans who financially benefit from government policies of greed;
7. Special interest ideological haters like radical environmentalists;
8. Spoiled brats from wealthy homes who like to hate and “get even” with parents who substituted retail products for loving caring families;
9. Other sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to Marxist-fascist cause which legitimizes their devotions to hating and hurting others;
10. Illegal immigrant non-citizens who have no cultural ties to America’s traditions, values, and principles who have no desire to become Americans; rather their motives are establish “colonies” serving their foreign homelands;
11. Reader can add to list.
If Part I and Part II are both true; America’s saving grace is that majority of Americans are not greedy, selfish, mean spirited haters, and will not become Massa Obama’s enforcers on governments’ plantations. TRUE or FALSE
Thursday, January 2, 2014
Texas Drifter: NFL Evolving Into Unethical Capitalism?
Library Entry # 618
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question to be answered, does NFL Commissioner and some team owners place profits motivated by greed before preserving integrity of one of America’s greatest sports institutions?
One definition of spiritual sin is: "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be answerable … For this reason many of you are weak and ill, and some have died." [1 Cor. 11:27-30]
Texas Drifter is not preaching; rather setting premise for Marshall’s Law Dateline question. Also, is not one of the Ten Commandments “Thou shall not steal”?
Observation, only economic system that does not violate Ten Commandments “Thou shall not steal” is ethical capitalism.
Sinful alternative economics systems include:
1. Unethical capitalism;
2. Corporate fascism;
3. Marxism;
4. Theological fascism;
5. Worst of all is Marxist-fascism advocated and practiced by Obama, Progressive Democrats, Obama Republicans representing Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats.
Common law seems based on many principles of Ten Commandments, and makes stealing physical “sin” also called crime separated by types like fraud, burglary, robbery, extortion, kidnapping, and others reader can list. Crimes are also separated by degrees like misdemeanor and felony.
There are two types of charity one is based on free will to help indigent or those in need. Public sector welfare based on confiscatory taxes is stealing and violates Ten Commandment about not stealing.
Before whining starts, primary sources of virtuous charity are provided by family members, churches, non-profit organizations, generous individuals and others reader can list. Charity provided by governments uses bribes stolen from society’s producers and workers to entice professional poor to support governments’ crimes against innocents.
Few examples of public subsidy addiction programs financed by governments stealing include:
1. SSI and Medicaid
2. Food stamps used to buy non- food products like alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, drugs, and retail products when food stamps can be redeemed for cash.
3. Government student loans are classic example of types of people Heaven’s Son cast from Temple. Student loans are placing millions of young Americans into indentured servants owing their futures to Marxist-fascist governments.
4. Reader can add to list.
Reader might be asking for examples of unethical capitalism: Easy answers include not delivering promised products or services at negotiated price. Having no pre-intentions of repaying debts, hence rare exceptions for bankruptcy claims for rare financial situations; note bankruptcy is not available for government student loans.
Perhaps classic un-ethical capitalism would be offering starving man fifty dollars for a five hundred dollar horse. Compare to un-ethical capitalism of price gouging following natural disasters like tornados or hurricanes; which is public crime.
Moving on to question is this writing exercise title. It is not uncommon for good instructors to learn for their students life experiences. Concept lost on America’s public school system which has become “re-education camps” for Marxist-fascist ideologues led by agencies like National Education Agency and their enforcers most teachers’ unions.
Initial question, are motivations to make exorbitant profits which could eventually destroy one of America’s most noble “working man” sports entertainment institutions professional football reality or just some peoples fantasies?
Follow up question: can one of America’s most noble “working man” sports entertainment institutions professional football be preserved with majority of owners devoted to NFL traditions who are also willing to accept non-price gouging profits?
If Texas Drifter is wrong about following assignment question; hope reader writes or speaks their sincerest opinions.
1. Are NFL spectator prices of game day tickets evolving from targeting blue collar workers to only white collar aristocrats?
2. Are highest paid players on field highest potential points’ scorers? If yes, would this cause commissioners and owners to change rules for defensive players whose positions services represent less expensive costs for team owners? Why to protect higher investments even if consequences would change integrity of game based of best offenses competing against best defenses.
3. Will greed motivated price gouging which represents unethical capitalism destroy integrity of professional football?
4. Reader can suggest their on solution for preserving integrity of professional football.
Bonus question are their sufficient fans and owners involved in process to restore professional football with necessary improvements to insure NFL always remains one of America’s greatest sports institutions?
Clue – Are there two types of owners? First, those with no personal experience ties to professional football; who do not step back and let general managers and coaches whose abilities promoted them up organizational employment hierarchy manage their organizations. Second, those with no personal experience ties to professional football; who step back and let general managers and coaches whose abilities promoted them up organizational employment hierarchy manage their organizations.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question to be answered, does NFL Commissioner and some team owners place profits motivated by greed before preserving integrity of one of America’s greatest sports institutions?
One definition of spiritual sin is: "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be answerable … For this reason many of you are weak and ill, and some have died." [1 Cor. 11:27-30]
Texas Drifter is not preaching; rather setting premise for Marshall’s Law Dateline question. Also, is not one of the Ten Commandments “Thou shall not steal”?
Observation, only economic system that does not violate Ten Commandments “Thou shall not steal” is ethical capitalism.
Sinful alternative economics systems include:
1. Unethical capitalism;
2. Corporate fascism;
3. Marxism;
4. Theological fascism;
5. Worst of all is Marxist-fascism advocated and practiced by Obama, Progressive Democrats, Obama Republicans representing Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats.
Common law seems based on many principles of Ten Commandments, and makes stealing physical “sin” also called crime separated by types like fraud, burglary, robbery, extortion, kidnapping, and others reader can list. Crimes are also separated by degrees like misdemeanor and felony.
There are two types of charity one is based on free will to help indigent or those in need. Public sector welfare based on confiscatory taxes is stealing and violates Ten Commandment about not stealing.
Before whining starts, primary sources of virtuous charity are provided by family members, churches, non-profit organizations, generous individuals and others reader can list. Charity provided by governments uses bribes stolen from society’s producers and workers to entice professional poor to support governments’ crimes against innocents.
Few examples of public subsidy addiction programs financed by governments stealing include:
1. SSI and Medicaid
2. Food stamps used to buy non- food products like alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, drugs, and retail products when food stamps can be redeemed for cash.
3. Government student loans are classic example of types of people Heaven’s Son cast from Temple. Student loans are placing millions of young Americans into indentured servants owing their futures to Marxist-fascist governments.
4. Reader can add to list.
Reader might be asking for examples of unethical capitalism: Easy answers include not delivering promised products or services at negotiated price. Having no pre-intentions of repaying debts, hence rare exceptions for bankruptcy claims for rare financial situations; note bankruptcy is not available for government student loans.
Perhaps classic un-ethical capitalism would be offering starving man fifty dollars for a five hundred dollar horse. Compare to un-ethical capitalism of price gouging following natural disasters like tornados or hurricanes; which is public crime.
Moving on to question is this writing exercise title. It is not uncommon for good instructors to learn for their students life experiences. Concept lost on America’s public school system which has become “re-education camps” for Marxist-fascist ideologues led by agencies like National Education Agency and their enforcers most teachers’ unions.
Initial question, are motivations to make exorbitant profits which could eventually destroy one of America’s most noble “working man” sports entertainment institutions professional football reality or just some peoples fantasies?
Follow up question: can one of America’s most noble “working man” sports entertainment institutions professional football be preserved with majority of owners devoted to NFL traditions who are also willing to accept non-price gouging profits?
If Texas Drifter is wrong about following assignment question; hope reader writes or speaks their sincerest opinions.
1. Are NFL spectator prices of game day tickets evolving from targeting blue collar workers to only white collar aristocrats?
2. Are highest paid players on field highest potential points’ scorers? If yes, would this cause commissioners and owners to change rules for defensive players whose positions services represent less expensive costs for team owners? Why to protect higher investments even if consequences would change integrity of game based of best offenses competing against best defenses.
3. Will greed motivated price gouging which represents unethical capitalism destroy integrity of professional football?
4. Reader can suggest their on solution for preserving integrity of professional football.
Bonus question are their sufficient fans and owners involved in process to restore professional football with necessary improvements to insure NFL always remains one of America’s greatest sports institutions?
Clue – Are there two types of owners? First, those with no personal experience ties to professional football; who do not step back and let general managers and coaches whose abilities promoted them up organizational employment hierarchy manage their organizations. Second, those with no personal experience ties to professional football; who step back and let general managers and coaches whose abilities promoted them up organizational employment hierarchy manage their organizations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)